乌木所有权的归属规则与物权立法的制度缺失——以媒体恶炒发现乌木归个人所有为视角
发布时间：2018-08-27 13:13
【摘要】：吴高亮发现乌木后,认为应当取得所有权。于是,媒体先是叫屈,继而放大政府与民争利是一种"选择性执法"的观点。乌木属于埋藏物,而非吴高亮理解的"野生动植物资源"或者专家认为的天然孳息。乌木被发现于承包的集体土地之内,意味着乌木埋藏的"埋藏物空间固定"、"埋藏物环境"等环境性因素的存在,作为至关重要的一个前置性因素,与古生物化石、矿产资源、文物的核心区别是代表的利益差别。《民法通则》第79条规定的"无主埋藏物归国家所有",在《物权法》第114条处理中倒退为按照遗失物处理,媒体不适当地为主权先占理论张目,扩大废弃物捡拾侵权、采蘑菇、挖奇石的资源合理利用的非正当推演逻辑,是缺乏媒体社会责任的表现。
[Abstract]:After Wu Gaoliang discovered ebony, he thought he should take ownership. Therefore, the media first called qu, then magnified the government and the people for profit is a "selective law enforcement" view. Ebony belongs to buried objects, not to what Wu Goliang understands as "wildlife resources" or what experts believe are natural fruits. The fact that ebony is found in the contracted collective land means the existence of environmental factors such as "fixed space of buried objects", "environment of buried objects", etc., as a vital preemptive factor, with fossil paleontology, mineral resources, etc. The core difference of cultural relics is the difference of interests represented. Article 79 of the General principles of Civil Law stipulates that "unowned buried objects shall be owned by the State", and in the treatment of Article 114 of the property Law, they will be retrogressively treated in accordance with the lost property. The improper deductive logic of improper use of resources such as improper preemption of sovereignty, expansion of waste pick-up infringement, mushroom picking, and rational utilization of resources is the lack of social responsibility of the media.
【作者单位】： 四川大学法学院;
【分类号】：D920.5;D923.2
本文编号：2207403
[Abstract]:After Wu Gaoliang discovered ebony, he thought he should take ownership. Therefore, the media first called qu, then magnified the government and the people for profit is a "selective law enforcement" view. Ebony belongs to buried objects, not to what Wu Goliang understands as "wildlife resources" or what experts believe are natural fruits. The fact that ebony is found in the contracted collective land means the existence of environmental factors such as "fixed space of buried objects", "environment of buried objects", etc., as a vital preemptive factor, with fossil paleontology, mineral resources, etc. The core difference of cultural relics is the difference of interests represented. Article 79 of the General principles of Civil Law stipulates that "unowned buried objects shall be owned by the State", and in the treatment of Article 114 of the property Law, they will be retrogressively treated in accordance with the lost property. The improper deductive logic of improper use of resources such as improper preemption of sovereignty, expansion of waste pick-up infringement, mushroom picking, and rational utilization of resources is the lack of social responsibility of the media.
【作者单位】： 四川大学法学院;
【分类号】：D920.5;D923.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈永正;从《大学衍义补》看丘浚的法律思想[J];泉州师范学院学报;2002年05期
2 ;[J];;年期
3 ;[J];;年期
4 ;[J];;年期
5 ;[J];;年期
6 ;[J];;年期
7 ;[J];;年期
8 ;[J];;年期
9 ;[J];;年期
10 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 朱艳燕;3721将CNNIC告上法庭[N];中华工商时报;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 李勤;清前期工商管理法律思想试析[D];中国政法大学;2001年
，本文编号：2207403
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2207403.html
