立法听证主体研究
发布时间：2018-09-11 15:52
【摘要】： 立法听证制度是近年来在法学理论和实践界都受到广泛关注的研究热点问题。十六大报告中明确提出要广泛建立听证制度,而立法听证更是将国家政治生活与社情民生紧密联系的纽带,其重要性不言而喻。在立法听证制度的框架中,立法听证主体制度占有重要的地位,它关系到整个立法听证程序由谁来参加,谁来掌控,各个参加者又是扮演的什么角色,从而决定了整个立法听证程序的走势和最后的听证决议,直接影响听证各代表集团的利益问题。 本文从立法听证主体制度的一般理论入手,分析了立法听证主体制度的含义、原则及分类。然后重点阐述了立法听证主体制度中的主持人制度与听证当事人及陈述人制度。在对立法听证主持人制度进行阐述时又分别从其保障制度、必要性分析、资格确定、素质要求和权利义务等几方面综合论述,突出了主持人在立法听证制度中的核心地位。在对听证当事人及陈述人制度进行阐述时,先对立法听证当事人的范围进行了分析界定。在界定当事人范围之后,又对当事人权利义务进行了概括。重点是将当事人制度中的陈述人制度单独提炼出来,对陈述人制度进行了细致的剖析。陈述人也是当事人,更准确地定义应该是被推选出来代表当事人进行听证活动的当事人。因为陈述人的遴选最能彰显整个立法听证制度的公平公正性和民主性,是能否赢得广大人群信任的重要环节。所以建立和完善陈述人制度在整个立法听证主体制度中是一个备受瞩目的环节,可以说是中心环节。文章在分析完主持人制度和当事人及陈述人制度后,概括了我国这两项制度的现状,最后独立提出了相应的完善建议。这一部分应该是本文作者观点的集中体现部分,也是整篇文章的创新点所在。在最后的完善建议部分,作者以重庆市首次立法听证会为例,在此基础上总结了现状制度中存在的种种弊端,最后特别针对关键的听证陈述人遴选制度提出了较为详细的完善意见。
[Abstract]:Legislative hearing system is a hot issue in the field of law theory and practice. In the report of the 16th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, it is clearly pointed out that the hearing system should be established extensively, and the legislative hearing is the link that links the political life of the country with the social situation and people's livelihood, and its importance is self-evident. In the framework of the legislative hearing system, the main body system of the legislative hearing plays an important role. It concerns who will participate in the whole legislative hearing procedure, who will control it, and what role each participant will play. It determines the trend of the whole legislative hearing procedure and the final hearing resolution, which directly affects the interests of the representative groups of the hearing. Based on the general theory of the subject system of legislative hearing, this paper analyzes the meaning, principle and classification of the system. Then, it focuses on the system of the moderator and the parties and presenters in the system of the main body of the legislative hearing. In the elaboration of the system of presiding officer in the legislative hearing, the central position of the moderator in the legislative hearing system is highlighted from the aspects of its safeguard system, necessity analysis, qualification determination, quality requirement and rights and obligations. In the system of hearing parties and declarants, the scope of the parties to the legislative hearing is analyzed and defined. After defining the scope of the parties, the rights and obligations of the parties are summarized. The key point is to separate the declarant system from the party system, and analyze the declarant system in detail. The declarant is also a party, which should be more accurately defined as the party elected to conduct the hearing on behalf of the party. It is because the selection of the speaker can show the fairness, fairness and democracy of the whole legislative hearing system, and it is an important link to win the trust of the broad masses of people. Therefore, the establishment and perfection of the declarant system in the whole system of the main body of the legislative hearing is a focus of attention, can be said to be the central link. After analyzing the host system and the litigant and presenter system, this paper summarizes the present situation of the two systems in China, and finally puts forward the corresponding suggestions independently. This part should be the author's point of view, but also the innovation of the whole article. In the last part of the perfection, the author takes Chongqing's first legislative hearing as an example, and sums up the disadvantages of the present system. Finally, the paper puts forward more detailed suggestions on the selection system of the key hearing presenters.
【学位授予单位】：重庆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D920.0
本文编号：2237143
[Abstract]:Legislative hearing system is a hot issue in the field of law theory and practice. In the report of the 16th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, it is clearly pointed out that the hearing system should be established extensively, and the legislative hearing is the link that links the political life of the country with the social situation and people's livelihood, and its importance is self-evident. In the framework of the legislative hearing system, the main body system of the legislative hearing plays an important role. It concerns who will participate in the whole legislative hearing procedure, who will control it, and what role each participant will play. It determines the trend of the whole legislative hearing procedure and the final hearing resolution, which directly affects the interests of the representative groups of the hearing. Based on the general theory of the subject system of legislative hearing, this paper analyzes the meaning, principle and classification of the system. Then, it focuses on the system of the moderator and the parties and presenters in the system of the main body of the legislative hearing. In the elaboration of the system of presiding officer in the legislative hearing, the central position of the moderator in the legislative hearing system is highlighted from the aspects of its safeguard system, necessity analysis, qualification determination, quality requirement and rights and obligations. In the system of hearing parties and declarants, the scope of the parties to the legislative hearing is analyzed and defined. After defining the scope of the parties, the rights and obligations of the parties are summarized. The key point is to separate the declarant system from the party system, and analyze the declarant system in detail. The declarant is also a party, which should be more accurately defined as the party elected to conduct the hearing on behalf of the party. It is because the selection of the speaker can show the fairness, fairness and democracy of the whole legislative hearing system, and it is an important link to win the trust of the broad masses of people. Therefore, the establishment and perfection of the declarant system in the whole system of the main body of the legislative hearing is a focus of attention, can be said to be the central link. After analyzing the host system and the litigant and presenter system, this paper summarizes the present situation of the two systems in China, and finally puts forward the corresponding suggestions independently. This part should be the author's point of view, but also the innovation of the whole article. In the last part of the perfection, the author takes Chongqing's first legislative hearing as an example, and sums up the disadvantages of the present system. Finally, the paper puts forward more detailed suggestions on the selection system of the key hearing presenters.
【学位授予单位】：重庆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D920.0
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 王健;;行政听证代表制度相关问题研究[J];法制与社会;2008年17期
2 唐娟,王莉娟;地方人大立法听证制度分析——以深圳市四次立法听证会为分析对象[J];贵阳金筑大学学报;2004年03期
3 徐莹;;浅析立法听证中的公众参与[J];湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版);2007年01期
4 汤达金;浙江省首次立法听证会[J];人大研究;2000年10期
5 马发明;从实践看听证立法需解决的主要问题[J];人大研究;2004年07期
6 陆海发;张红莲;;协商民主视角下我国听证制度的现实困境与出路[J];山东行政学院山东省经济管理干部学院学报;2008年05期
7 温晋锋;行政听证关系及其主体研究[J];学海;2001年05期
8 曾洁雯;;论建立公听代表人制度的必要性与可行性[J];行政与法;2008年06期
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 于红梅;我国行政立法听证制度研究[D];中国石油大学;2007年
2 童中华;听证主持人制度研究[D];苏州大学;2008年
3 于明霞;我国地方政府立法听证分析[D];中国海洋大学;2008年
，本文编号：2237143
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2237143.html
