论英国土地保有关系对债作为财产所有权客体的影响
发布时间：2018-10-13 10:05
【摘要】：英国法上,财产所有权的客体不是有体物而是财产利益。英国法财产所有权客体的形成有其特定的历史原因,土地保有关系的产生是英国法财产权客体定位为财产利益的根本原因,土地保有关系模式下的这种立法思想深深影响了英国所有权客体理论。在英国法上,任何具有独占排他的财产利益均可以成为所有权的客体,因合同等原因而产生的债属于债权人的财产利益,因此英国法将其作为所有权的客体。英国法明确区分因合同产生的债的所有权以及合同权利本身,英国法的债权的二分理论值得我国学界研究。
[Abstract]:In English law, the object of property ownership is not a substance but a property interest. There are specific historical reasons for the formation of the object of property ownership in English law, and the emergence of land tenure is the fundamental reason why the object of property right of English law is positioned as the benefit of property. This kind of legislative thought under the land tenure mode has deeply influenced the theory of the object of ownership in Britain. In English law, any property interest with exclusive ownership can be the object of ownership, and the debt arising from contract and other reasons belongs to the creditor's property interest, so English law regards it as the object of ownership. The English law clearly distinguishes the ownership of the debt arising from the contract and the contractual right itself. The dichotomy of the claims of English law is worthy of our academic research.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学;广东东莞理工学院政法学院;
【分类号】：D956.1;DD913
本文编号：2268210
[Abstract]:In English law, the object of property ownership is not a substance but a property interest. There are specific historical reasons for the formation of the object of property ownership in English law, and the emergence of land tenure is the fundamental reason why the object of property right of English law is positioned as the benefit of property. This kind of legislative thought under the land tenure mode has deeply influenced the theory of the object of ownership in Britain. In English law, any property interest with exclusive ownership can be the object of ownership, and the debt arising from contract and other reasons belongs to the creditor's property interest, so English law regards it as the object of ownership. The English law clearly distinguishes the ownership of the debt arising from the contract and the contractual right itself. The dichotomy of the claims of English law is worthy of our academic research.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学;广东东莞理工学院政法学院;
【分类号】：D956.1;DD913
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 刘德良;许中缘;;物权债权区分理论的质疑[J];河北法学;2007年01期
2 陈华彬;物权与债权二元权利体系的形成以及物权和债权的区分[J];河北法学;2004年09期
【共引文献】
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 申建平;债权让与制度研究[D];厦门大学;2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 胡春梅;租赁权物权化研究[D];中国政法大学;2006年
2 方震;物权法定主义及其当代命运[D];山东大学;2006年
3 苗柳;论第三人侵害债权制度[D];华东政法大学;2007年
4 许磊;债的相对性及其之突破[D];华东政法大学;2007年
5 卞盛华;房屋租赁的若干法律问题研究[D];四川大学;2007年
6 向晟;虚拟财产的法律分析[D];四川大学;2007年
【二级参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 金可可;债权物权区分说的构成要素[J];法学研究;2005年01期
，本文编号：2268210
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2268210.html
