试论第三人间接损害赔偿问题——以日本的学说及实践为中心
发布时间：2018-10-31 19:23
【摘要】：正一、问题的提出在"林玉暖案"中,法院运用扩张解释,肯定了直接受害人以外的近亲属自身的赔偿请求权,对《人身损害赔偿司法解释》进行了创造性地适用。〔1〕但本案也给我们提出了不少问题:侵权行为造成的损害在直接受害人之外发生之情形,是否肯定"间接受害人"的损害赔偿请求权主体地位?若予以肯定,其标准何在?其赔偿范围如何界定?本案是《民法通则》及其司法解释背景下的司法运用,在《侵权责任法》背景下,其解释论依据何在?
[Abstract]:First, the question was raised in the "Lin Yu-nao case," in which the court used the expanded interpretation to affirm the right to claim compensation from close relatives other than the direct victims. The judicial interpretation of personal injury compensation is creatively applied. (1) but this case also raises many questions: the damage caused by the infringement occurred outside the direct victim, Is it certain that the "indirect victim" is the subject of the claim for damages? If yes, what are the criteria? How to define the scope of compensation? This case is the judicial application under the background of "General principles of Civil Law" and its judicial interpretation. Under the background of "Tort liability Law", what is the basis of its interpretation?
【作者单位】： 浙江大学;
【基金】：浙江省社科规划“之江青年课题研究”与中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金暨浙江大学社科学部科研培育项目“损害填补的多元化与法律体系整合研究”(项目号11ZJQN049YB)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D931.3;DD913
[Abstract]:First, the question was raised in the "Lin Yu-nao case," in which the court used the expanded interpretation to affirm the right to claim compensation from close relatives other than the direct victims. The judicial interpretation of personal injury compensation is creatively applied. (1) but this case also raises many questions: the damage caused by the infringement occurred outside the direct victim, Is it certain that the "indirect victim" is the subject of the claim for damages? If yes, what are the criteria? How to define the scope of compensation? This case is the judicial application under the background of "General principles of Civil Law" and its judicial interpretation. Under the background of "Tort liability Law", what is the basis of its interpretation?
【作者单位】： 浙江大学;
【基金】：浙江省社科规划“之江青年课题研究”与中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金暨浙江大学社科学部科研培育项目“损害填补的多元化与法律体系整合研究”(项目号11ZJQN049YB)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D931.3;DD913
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 周琼;陈晓红;;侵害“其他人格利益”精神损害赔偿的限制——一种比较法的视角[J];法商研究;2011年05期
2 葛云松;;《侵权责任法》保护的民事权益[J];中国法学;2010年03期
3 王成;;侵权法的规范体系及其适用——以《侵权责任法》第5条的解释适用为背景[J];政治与法律;2011年01期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 叶若思;罗剑青;祝建军;孙虹;;驰名商标司法认定的理论与审判实践[J];中华商标;2008年11期
2 张彦，
本文编号：2303299
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2303299.html
