当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 法史论文 >

司法协助行为与行政处罚的甄别认定

发布时间:2018-11-01 16:30
【摘要】:正【案情】原告陈绍宝起诉称:原告于2008年11月19日,因非法经营罪,被宁波市镇海区人民法院以(2008)甬镇刑初字第283号刑事判决书,判处有期徒刑5年9个月,对原告被查扣的卷烟由查扣机关依法处理。被告于2009年1月6日,向原告开具浙江省罚没财物专用票据1张,在处罚决定书号码一栏填写(2008)甬镇刑初字第283号。原告于2011年7月6日假释出狱后收到此票据。原告认为被告对原告进行行政处罚,应当对原告作出书面的行政处罚决定书,但
[Abstract]:The plaintiff, Chen Shaobao, sued: on November 19, 2008, the plaintiff was sentenced to five years and nine months' imprisonment by the people's Court of Zhenhai District of Ningbo City by criminal judgment No. 283 of (2008) Yongzhen's initial sentence for illegal business operations. Cigarettes seized by the plaintiff shall be dealt with by the seizure authorities in accordance with the law. On January 6, 2009, the defendant issued to the plaintiff a special bill of Zhejiang Province for the forfeiture of property, and filled out (2008) Yongzhen Criminal initial word No. 283 in the column of the penalty decision number. The plaintiff received the bill on parole on July 6, 2011. The plaintiff considers that if the defendant carries out administrative punishment on the plaintiff, he shall make a written decision on the administrative penalty for the plaintiff, but
【作者单位】: 浙江省宁波市镇海区人民法院;
【分类号】:D920.5;D922.1


本文编号:2304473

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2304473.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户f78f0***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com