诉讼社会与无讼社会的辨析和启示——纠纷解决机制中的国家与社会
发布时间：2018-11-10 22:43
【摘要】：中国法律史的最新研究成果表明,古代中国尽管确实存在着相对"无讼"的现象和"息讼"的努力,但实际上有不少区域呈现出"诉讼社会"的景象,诉讼滥用、欺诈诉讼、恶意诉讼等甚至成为一些地方严重的社会问题。除了深刻的经济、社会和文化原因外,中央集权下发达的司法体制与民间社会自治的相对弱势,是形成诉讼社会的关键要因。当诉讼超出社会和司法的承受力之时,官府对诉讼的限制乃至打压,就成为不可避免的潜规则。滥讼与讼难交织的恶性循环,既破坏了司法的公信力,也必然导致社会治理的混乱和道德失范。历史经验表明,"诉讼社会"和"无讼社会"这两种理想类型,都不能独立成为社会治理的合理模式,现实的选择只能是通过多元化纠纷解决机制来应对各种社会需求和危机,从而形成国家法律机制与社会自治的协调,逐步接近善治。
[Abstract]:The latest research results in China's legal history show that although there was a relatively "no lawsuit" phenomenon and "interest litigation" in ancient China, in fact, there are many regions showing a "litigation society", litigation abuse, fraud litigation, Malicious litigation has even become a serious social problem in some places. Besides the profound economic, social and cultural reasons, the relative weakness of the developed judicial system and civil society autonomy under the centralization of power is the key factor to form the litigation society. When litigation is beyond the capacity of society and judicature, the restriction and even suppression of litigation by the government becomes an inevitable hidden rule. The vicious circle of excessive litigation and difficult litigation not only destroys the credibility of judicature, but also leads to chaos of social governance and moral anomie. Historical experience shows that the two ideal types of "litigation society" and "non-litigation society" cannot independently become the reasonable mode of social governance, and the realistic choice is to deal with various social needs and crises through diversified dispute resolution mechanisms. Thus forming the national legal mechanism and social autonomy coordination, gradually close to good governance.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学法学院;
【基金】：复旦大学985三期整体推进社会科学研究项目“维护社会公平正义的司法制度建设研究”(项目编号:2011SHKXZD015) 中国人民大学纠纷解决研究中心重点标志性研究项目“多元化纠纷解决机制”的研究成果之一
【分类号】：D929
[Abstract]:The latest research results in China's legal history show that although there was a relatively "no lawsuit" phenomenon and "interest litigation" in ancient China, in fact, there are many regions showing a "litigation society", litigation abuse, fraud litigation, Malicious litigation has even become a serious social problem in some places. Besides the profound economic, social and cultural reasons, the relative weakness of the developed judicial system and civil society autonomy under the centralization of power is the key factor to form the litigation society. When litigation is beyond the capacity of society and judicature, the restriction and even suppression of litigation by the government becomes an inevitable hidden rule. The vicious circle of excessive litigation and difficult litigation not only destroys the credibility of judicature, but also leads to chaos of social governance and moral anomie. Historical experience shows that the two ideal types of "litigation society" and "non-litigation society" cannot independently become the reasonable mode of social governance, and the realistic choice is to deal with various social needs and crises through diversified dispute resolution mechanisms. Thus forming the national legal mechanism and social autonomy coordination, gradually close to good governance.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学法学院;
【基金】：复旦大学985三期整体推进社会科学研究项目“维护社会公平正义的司法制度建设研究”(项目编号:2011SHKXZD015) 中国人民大学纠纷解决研究中心重点标志性研究项目“多元化纠纷解决机制”的研究成果之一
【分类号】：D929
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 范愉;以多元化纠纷解决机制 保证社会的可持续发展[J];法律适用;2005年02期
2 范愉;;《中华人民共和国人民调解法》评析[J];法学家;2011年02期
3 尤陈俊;;“厌讼”幻象之下的“健讼”实相? 重思明清中国的诉讼与社会[J];中外法学;2012年04期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王亚明;;仲裁不予执行制度的反思与重构[J];阿坝师范高等专科学校学报;2007年04期
2 王亚明;杜万松;;中国民事诉讼依“法”裁判辨正——从档案统计的视角[J];阿坝师范高等专科学校学报;2008年02期
3 王亚明;;多元纠纷解决机制的法文化探析[J];安徽大学法律评论;2006年02期
4 李相森;;包公断案中的个性因素探析[J];安徽大学法律评论;2009年01期
5 任志强;;明清时期坟茔的纷争[J];安徽大学法律评论;2009年01期
6 蔡晓荣;王国平;;晚清中国商业行会对洋商的“停交”抵制活动——基于经济和法律的视角[J];安徽史学;2006年05期
7 郑小春;;清代陋规及其对基层司法和地方民情的影响——从徽州讼费帐单谈起[J];安徽史学;2009年02期
8 姚e，
本文编号：2323771
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2323771.html
