美国专利诉讼中的临时禁令制度研究
发布时间：2019-01-08 18:58
【摘要】：在知识产权领域，特别是专利权领域，临时禁令制度是一种重要的临时救济措施。它及时保护权利人的合法利益，避免将来受到难以弥补的损害，其效果是其他措施不能比拟的。临时禁令制度在西方资本主义先进国家已经经历了数百年的发展历程，目前整个体系已比较完善。而我国的临时禁令制度是在我国为了加入世界贸易组织（WTO），与国际接轨的背景下引入的，虽然在知识产权的临时性保护方面发挥出一定的效果，，但总体而言还远未达到完善的阶段。 笔者在本文中主要通过理论与实践结合和比较分析的方法，对临时禁令制度在美国专利诉讼中的适用条件及实践情况进行了详细、深入的分析论述，并在这基础上与我国实际情况作对比研究，对我国临时禁令制度的完善提出了一些建议。 第一部分是关于美国临时禁令制度的概况介绍，从禁令的起源谈起，具体介绍了临时禁令的概念、特征以及美国临时禁令的类型，着重阐述了临时禁令制度在美国专利侵权诉讼中的发展情况，并对临时禁令在专利诉讼中的重要性进行总结，为下面的具体研究工作奠定基础。 第二部分深入探讨了临时禁令制度在美国专利诉讼中的具体适用的程序要件，如听证程序、担保方式和上诉程序等。 第三部分结合司法实践对胜诉的可能性、难以弥补的损害、双方利益的权衡、公共利益的考虑等四个实质条件要求进行深入的研究分析，找出美国专利诉讼中临时禁令制度中值得借鉴的经验。 第四部分结合我国专利诉讼中临时禁令的具体现状问题，介绍了临时禁令与传统民事救济方法即财产保全、先予执行和证据保全的区别，同时与美国临时禁令制度进行对比分析，就我国专利诉讼临时禁令制度的完善和实践应用提出自己的看法和一些解决方案，如设立合理的审查期限、设立专门审查部门、明确规定听证程序、对担保形式作灵活要求、完善复议程序以及完善“难以弥补的损害”和“胜诉可能性”等具体的实质审查标准等。
[Abstract]:In the field of intellectual property, especially in the field of patent, temporary injunction is an important temporary remedy. It protects the legitimate interests of the obligee in time and avoids irreparable damage in the future, the effect of which is incomparable with other measures. The temporary prohibition system has experienced hundreds of years of development in the advanced western capitalist countries, and the whole system has been relatively perfect. China's temporary ban system was introduced in the context of China's entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO) (WTO), in line with international standards, although it has played a certain role in the temporary protection of intellectual property rights. But overall it is far from perfect. In this paper, the author mainly through the combination of theory and practice and comparative analysis of the temporary injunction system in the United States patent proceedings in the application of conditions and practice of a detailed, in-depth analysis, On this basis, the author makes a comparative study with the actual situation of our country, and puts forward some suggestions on the perfection of the temporary prohibition system in our country. The first part is an overview of the temporary prohibition system in the United States, starting from the origin of the ban, introducing the concept, characteristics and types of the temporary prohibition in the United States. This paper emphatically expounds the development of the temporary injunction system in the patent infringement litigation in the United States, and summarizes the importance of the temporary injunction in the patent litigation, which lays a foundation for the following concrete research work. The second part discusses the procedural requirements of the application of the temporary injunction system in patent litigation in the United States, such as hearing procedure, guarantee method and appeal procedure. The third part of the judicial practice on the possibility of success, irreparable damage, the balance of interests of both sides, the consideration of public interest and other four substantive conditions for in-depth research and analysis, Find out the experience that should be used for reference in the temporary injunction system of patent litigation in the United States. The fourth part introduces the difference between the temporary injunction and the traditional civil relief method, namely property preservation, first execution and evidence preservation, combined with the current situation of temporary injunction in patent litigation in China. At the same time, by comparing with the temporary injunction system of the United States, the author puts forward his own views and some solutions on the perfection and practical application of the temporary injunction system of patent litigation in our country, such as setting up a reasonable period of examination, setting up a special examination department. It clearly stipulates the hearing procedure, makes flexible request to the form of guarantee, consummates the procedure of reconsideration, and consummates the concrete substantive examination standards such as "irreparable damage" and "possibility of success", etc.
【学位授予单位】：华南理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D971.2;D923.42;D925.1
本文编号：2404996
[Abstract]:In the field of intellectual property, especially in the field of patent, temporary injunction is an important temporary remedy. It protects the legitimate interests of the obligee in time and avoids irreparable damage in the future, the effect of which is incomparable with other measures. The temporary prohibition system has experienced hundreds of years of development in the advanced western capitalist countries, and the whole system has been relatively perfect. China's temporary ban system was introduced in the context of China's entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO) (WTO), in line with international standards, although it has played a certain role in the temporary protection of intellectual property rights. But overall it is far from perfect. In this paper, the author mainly through the combination of theory and practice and comparative analysis of the temporary injunction system in the United States patent proceedings in the application of conditions and practice of a detailed, in-depth analysis, On this basis, the author makes a comparative study with the actual situation of our country, and puts forward some suggestions on the perfection of the temporary prohibition system in our country. The first part is an overview of the temporary prohibition system in the United States, starting from the origin of the ban, introducing the concept, characteristics and types of the temporary prohibition in the United States. This paper emphatically expounds the development of the temporary injunction system in the patent infringement litigation in the United States, and summarizes the importance of the temporary injunction in the patent litigation, which lays a foundation for the following concrete research work. The second part discusses the procedural requirements of the application of the temporary injunction system in patent litigation in the United States, such as hearing procedure, guarantee method and appeal procedure. The third part of the judicial practice on the possibility of success, irreparable damage, the balance of interests of both sides, the consideration of public interest and other four substantive conditions for in-depth research and analysis, Find out the experience that should be used for reference in the temporary injunction system of patent litigation in the United States. The fourth part introduces the difference between the temporary injunction and the traditional civil relief method, namely property preservation, first execution and evidence preservation, combined with the current situation of temporary injunction in patent litigation in China. At the same time, by comparing with the temporary injunction system of the United States, the author puts forward his own views and some solutions on the perfection and practical application of the temporary injunction system of patent litigation in our country, such as setting up a reasonable period of examination, setting up a special examination department. It clearly stipulates the hearing procedure, makes flexible request to the form of guarantee, consummates the procedure of reconsideration, and consummates the concrete substantive examination standards such as "irreparable damage" and "possibility of success", etc.
【学位授予单位】：华南理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D971.2;D923.42;D925.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张江涛,薛波;美国中间禁令探讨[J];北京理工大学学报(社会科学版);2005年03期
2 韩天岚;知识产权诉讼中诉前禁令的适用[J];电子知识产权;2004年04期
3 张亮;王健;;我国诉前禁令制度探析[J];佛山科学技术学院学报(社会科学版);2010年01期
4 李澜;美国禁令制度研究——兼评我国知识产权诉讼中临时禁令制度[J];科技与法律;2003年02期
5 和育东;;美国专利侵权的禁令救济[J];环球法律评论;2009年05期
6 施高翔;齐树洁;;我国知识产权禁令制度的重构[J];厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年05期
7 刘洋;朱雪忠;;论临时禁令制度的不足与完善[J];学习月刊;2006年12期
8 孙海龙;姚建军;;中美两国专利临时禁令制度比较研究[J];中国专利与商标;2008年03期
9 李德山;临时禁令在美国专利侵权诉讼中的适用[J];知识产权;1999年05期
10 胡震远;知识产权案件中临时禁令的适用标准[J];知识产权;2001年06期
本文编号：2404996
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2404996.html
