论罗蒂新实用主义法律思想
发布时间：2019-01-10 07:38
【摘要】： 罗蒂是美国新实用主义的代表人物,也是西方后现代主义思潮的主要理论家之一。实用主义哲学是美国的本土哲学,罗蒂的新实用主义法律思想是在美国这一实用主义的文化背景下诞生的,哲学实用主义与法律实用主义共同组成了罗蒂法律思想的重要源头。反基础主义的法理学与充满想象力的司法哲学是其法律思想中最为重要的两大立场。罗蒂的法理学秉持反基础主义的思维特征,强烈反对以兰德尔为代表的法律形式主义,提出预言家之论,认为好的预言家将采纳实用主义的方法,指出法律实用主义反叛权威寻求个体之间的共识,因而种族中心主义的法律理论是反基础之后的必然出路,充分体现了其“平庸的”实用主义法律观;在司法哲学上,罗蒂追随杜威的实验主义立场,支持社会实验高于理论,通过对美国历史上著名宪法案例的分析和独特解读,鼓励法律工作者进行充满想象力的司法实验——“黑暗中的跳跃”,从而打破作为约束性法律的错误的先例之链,实现范式的转变,最终达致理论的消解和创造力的张扬。罗蒂法律思想的理论贡献是多重的,不仅在于其自由思想所带来的无限启迪,而且对于后现代法学来讲,罗蒂始终是个绕不过去的名字。必须认真对待罗蒂的新实用主义法律思想,它是开启美国司法哲学之门的一枚至关重要的钥匙。罗蒂思想中所包含的智识资源对于我国的法学研究和司法实践而言具有一定的积极意义。
[Abstract]:Roddy is the representative of American neo-pragmatism and one of the main theorists of western postmodernism. Pragmatism philosophy is the native philosophy of the United States. Rorty's new pragmatism legal thought was born under the cultural background of American pragmatism. Philosophical pragmatism and legal pragmatism together constituted the important source of Rorty's legal thought. Anti-foundational jurisprudence and imaginative judicial philosophy are the two most important positions in his legal thought. Rorty's jurisprudence adheres to the characteristics of anti-foundational thinking, strongly opposes the legal formalism represented by Randall, and puts forward the theory of the prophet, who believes that the good prophet will adopt a pragmatic approach. It points out that legal pragmatism rebel authority seeks common understanding among individuals, so the legal theory of ethnocentrism is an inevitable way after anti-foundation, which fully embodies its "mediocre" pragmatism legal view. In judicial philosophy, Rorty follows Dewey's stand of experimentalism, supports social experiment higher than theory, through the analysis and unique interpretation of famous constitutional cases in American history. To encourage legal workers to carry out imaginative judicial experiment, "jumping in the dark", thus breaking the chain of precedents which are the errors of binding laws, realizing the transformation of paradigm, and finally achieving the elimination of theory and the publicity of creativity. The theoretical contribution of Rorty's legal thought lies not only in the infinite enlightenment brought by his free thought, but also in the post-modern law. Rorty's new pragmatic legal thought must be taken seriously. It is a crucial key to open the door of American judicial philosophy. The intellectual resources contained in Rorty's thought have certain positive significance for the legal research and judicial practice of our country.
【学位授予单位】：湖南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D909.712
本文编号：2406060
[Abstract]:Roddy is the representative of American neo-pragmatism and one of the main theorists of western postmodernism. Pragmatism philosophy is the native philosophy of the United States. Rorty's new pragmatism legal thought was born under the cultural background of American pragmatism. Philosophical pragmatism and legal pragmatism together constituted the important source of Rorty's legal thought. Anti-foundational jurisprudence and imaginative judicial philosophy are the two most important positions in his legal thought. Rorty's jurisprudence adheres to the characteristics of anti-foundational thinking, strongly opposes the legal formalism represented by Randall, and puts forward the theory of the prophet, who believes that the good prophet will adopt a pragmatic approach. It points out that legal pragmatism rebel authority seeks common understanding among individuals, so the legal theory of ethnocentrism is an inevitable way after anti-foundation, which fully embodies its "mediocre" pragmatism legal view. In judicial philosophy, Rorty follows Dewey's stand of experimentalism, supports social experiment higher than theory, through the analysis and unique interpretation of famous constitutional cases in American history. To encourage legal workers to carry out imaginative judicial experiment, "jumping in the dark", thus breaking the chain of precedents which are the errors of binding laws, realizing the transformation of paradigm, and finally achieving the elimination of theory and the publicity of creativity. The theoretical contribution of Rorty's legal thought lies not only in the infinite enlightenment brought by his free thought, but also in the post-modern law. Rorty's new pragmatic legal thought must be taken seriously. It is a crucial key to open the door of American judicial philosophy. The intellectual resources contained in Rorty's thought have certain positive significance for the legal research and judicial practice of our country.
【学位授予单位】：湖南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D909.712
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 朱苏力;后现代思潮与中国法学和法制——兼与季卫东先生商榷[J];法学;1997年03期
2 潘多拉;法官如何“创造”法律[J];法律与生活;2003年11期
3 梁迎修;;寻求一种温和的司法能动主义——论疑难案件中法官的司法哲学[J];河北法学;2008年02期
4 陈亚军;;非形而上的伦理学何以可能?——论罗蒂新实用主义道德哲学[J];华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年04期
5 陈亚军;论罗蒂的“后哲学文化”设计[J];开放时代;1997年02期
6 葛洪义;法学研究中的认识论问题[J];法学研究;2001年02期
7 衣俊卿;;包容的力量——纪念罗蒂[J];求是学刊;2007年04期
8 O.W.霍姆斯,许章润;法律之道[J];环球法律评论;2001年03期
9 陈亚军;西方哲学病的诊治者──罗蒂反基础主义理论释解[J];厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1997年02期
10 帕特里克·贝尔特;朱红文;;作为一种社会科学哲学的实用主义[J];浙江社会科学;2007年01期
，本文编号：2406060
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2406060.html
