《天坛宪法草案》研究
[Abstract]:The upsurge of constitution-making after the founding of the Republic of China began with the drafting of the draft Constitution of Temple of Heaven. Since 1913, political forces of all parties have carried out constitution-making activities for more than 10 years under the background of parliamentary politics for various purposes. However, the cruel and strangling fact is that the draft Constitution of Temple of Heaven has not only failed to lay a solid foundation for parliamentary democracy after the establishment of the Republic of China. However, it also forced the hard-won Congress to be strongly disbanded by Yuan Shikai, who has been infected by autocratic dictatorship. When later scholars reflected on the drafting process and the final outcome of this draft constitution, they agreed that Yuan Shikai's autocratic political thought destroyed the germination of the constitutional system in the early years of the Republic of China. It was the culprit of the failure of democratic political transformation in the early years of the Republic of China. In the early years of the Republic of China, the victory of the Revolution of 1911 made it impossible for the general public to accept the imperial system any more. Whether to comply with the historical trend to carry out democratic parliamentary politics, or to adhere to feudal rule against the will of the people, Yuan Shikai wavered in the process of choosing these two roads. Although Yuan Shikai is very inconvenient with the shackles of the interim Law, he hopes to write about the constitution and fantasize about using the legal coat of the constitution to cover up his imperial dream. Therefore, in the process of formulating the draft Constitution of Temple of Heaven, Yuan Shikai tried his best to interfere in the formulation of the Constitution in various ways and means in order to maximize his political power. The purpose and direction of constitution formulation is generally determined by the political faction that occupies absolute power in a country's political environment. The effect of constitution formulation usually depends on whether each political group can reach the compromise of its own political interests. As far as political strength is concerned, the Northern warlords headed by Yuan Shikai are the most powerful. For Yuan Shikai, who thinks he has contributed to the victory of the 1911 Revolution, whether his political demands can be realized in the political system in the early years of the Republic of China. It is crucial to the final fate of the draft Constitution of the Temple of Heaven. Reflecting on the failure and bankruptcy of the Temple of Heaven draft Constitution, one of the reasons that can not be ignored is that the content of the draft Constitution does not meet the demands of Yuan Shikai's political interests, thus arousing the strong rebound of the Beiyang faction. The draft Constitution of Temple of Heaven is the first draft constitution drawn up by a national elected representative in Chinese history. Because of the complex historical environment at that time, the draft constitution finally went bankrupt, making the draft constitution unknown in history. Many criticisms have been received, so it is of great significance to study the constitutional movement in the Republic of China by investigating its true face, analyzing its progress and reflecting on its gains and losses. The content of this paper consists of four parts. The first part mainly introduces the background of drafting the draft Constitution of Temple of Heaven. The second part expounds the drafting process of the draft Constitution of the Temple of Heaven, the debate on the drafting content, the final drafting content, the characteristics of the drafting content and the comparison with some other constitutions. The third part focuses on the analysis of the political system involved in the draft Constitution of Heaven, and the fourth part is the evaluation of the draft Constitution of Temple of Heaven.
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D929
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 秦颖慧;秦潇;;政府网络舆论危机问题研究[J];阿坝师范高等专科学校学报;2011年01期
2 申惠文;;驳民法宪法新同位论[J];安徽大学法律评论;2008年02期
3 张训;;论民生刑法的出场——受达顿《中国的规制与惩罚:从父权社会到民权社会》的启迪[J];安徽大学法律评论;2011年02期
4 汤奇学;安徽辛亥革命的特点[J];安徽大学学报;2001年05期
5 李勇军;欧阳仁根;;合作社立法模式比较分析及我国的合理选择——基于我国目前民商事立法的背景[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年05期
6 高强;清末革命派尊黄现象述论[J];安徽史学;2001年04期
7 李国环;孙中山发展农业和振兴实业的经济思想述评[J];安徽史学;2002年03期
8 李里峰;代性及其限度:民国文官考试制度平议[J];安徽史学;2004年05期
9 操申斌;近代中国大同思想的比较研究及其启示[J];安徽史学;2005年06期
10 李玉;;民初国民党上层拉人入党现象考论[J];安徽史学;2007年05期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 何军;;有效性:共产党执政体系的治理绩效基础[A];变革世界中的政党政治——中国统一战线理论研究会政党理论北京研究基地论文集(第五辑)[C];2012年
2 刘茂林;;村民自治权之规范求证及解题[A];新农村建设的制度保障[C];2005年
3 韩春晖;;民主:一种世俗化的实践理性——评熊彼特的民主观兼谈对我国政治文明建设的启示[A];北京高校宪法学与行政法学博士生第二次论坛--“现代民主与行政法”研讨会会议资料[C];2006年
4 黄宇和;;山在虚无缥缈间:孙逸仙民生主义伦敦探源[A];北京论坛(2005)文明的和谐与共同繁荣——全球化视野中亚洲的机遇与发展:“历史变化:实际的、被表现的和想象的”历史分论坛论文或摘要集(下)[C];2005年
5 刘海峰;;“科举,非恶制也”——兼谈教育史研究中的知今通古问题[A];纪念《教育史研究》创刊二十周年论文集(3)——中国教育制度史研究[C];2009年
6 李悦;;国家治理体系中执政党合法性探微[A];湖北省行政管理学会2006年年会论文集[C];2007年
7 姚会元;;孙中山的金融理论与实践[A];纪念辛亥革命一百周年《中国钱币》2011年第一期增刊[C];2011年
8 杨秀香;;走向制度化的伦理学——对中国现代化进程中道德建设的反思[A];繁荣·和谐·振兴——辽宁省哲学社会科学首届学术年会获奖成果文集[C];2007年
9 齐卫平;;孙中山向西方寻找真理途程的历史考察[A];近代中国(第二辑)[C];1991年
10 郭世佑;;孙中山、黄兴关系再评价[A];近代中国(第二辑)[C];1991年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 吴旅燕;论我国私有财产权的宪法保护[D];华东政法大学;2010年
2 徐少辉;上海金融中心法制变迁及决策研究[D];华东政法大学;2010年
3 张周国;南京国民政府时期劳动契约制度研究[D];华东政法大学;2010年
4 饶传平;论近代中国宪法中基本权利条款之演变(1908-1947)[D];华东政法大学;2010年
5 郭胜利;民国政府西北民族政策研究[D];兰州大学;2010年
6 王红梅;商会与中国法制近代化[D];华东政法大学;2010年
7 张海斌;转型社会中的乡村自治与法治[D];华东政法大学;2010年
8 戴均;当代中国转型社会的政治认同研究[D];陕西师范大学;2010年
9 徐悦;1949~1954年中国中央行政体制研究[D];南开大学;2010年
10 赵聚军;中国行政区划改革的理论研究[D];南开大学;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 刘U
本文编号:2483260
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2483260.html