法律语言模糊性的语义学与语用学研究
发布时间：2024-03-19 19:30
针对一些对法律语言模糊性的错误看法,即认为法律语言要尽可能减少甚至消除模糊语言,本文在对宪法、刑法及合同法条款研究的基础上,主要采用定性分析方法,对法律语言的模糊性进行了全面的语言学分析,旨在发现其语言上的语用规律及原因,由此得出立法者的真正意图。本文首先根据语义学理论在大量例证的基础上,主要从词汇层面,对模糊性在语言上的实现做了分析并对法律条款中常用的模糊词及模糊表达进行了归类。在此基础上,本文分析了意义模糊引起的问题,如法律解释的不确定性。作者进一步运用格莱斯的合作原则和布朗与莱文生的礼貌理论对法律模糊语言进行了语用学分析,得出法律语言模糊性的语用规律及立法者运用模糊语言的意图。最后作者总结了模糊语言在法律中的语用功能。作者认为法律语言的模糊性有其存在的客观必然性,合理使用可以实现若干功能。
【文章页数】：68 页
【学位级别】：硕士
【文章目录】：
Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Research Background
1.2 Significance of the Research
1.3 Data Selection
1.4 Methodology
Chapter Two Literature Review
2.1 Vagueness Associated with Sorites Paradox and Fuzzy Logic
2.2 Explaining Vagueness in the Context of Semantics
2.2.1 Semantics and Vagueness
2.2.2 Ruth M. Kempson's Categorization
2.3 Legal Language
2.3.1 Relationship between Language and Law
2.3.2 Linguistic Features of Legal Language
2.3.3 Sources of Vagueness in Legal Language
2.4 Previous Research in the Field of Vagueness in Legal Language
2.4.1 Timothy's Standard View
2.4.2 H.L.A. Hart's Open-texture Theory
2.4.3 Ronald Dworkin's Theory of Adjudication
2.5 Summary
Chapter Three Linguistic Realization of Vagueness in Legal Language—in Semantic Perspective
3.1 Model for Categorization of Hedge in Legal Language
3.1.1 Definition of Hedge
3.1.2 Categorization of Hedges
3.2 Model for Analyzing Hedges in Legal Language
3.2.1 Shields
3.2.1.1 Modal Auxiliaries
3.2.1.2 Probability Adverbs and Their Derivative Adjectives
3.2.2 Approximators
3.2.2.1 Adaptors
3.2.2.2 Rounders
3.2.3 Findings about Hedges Used in Legal Documents
3.3 General orAbstract Lexis.
3.3.1 Abstract Legal Terminology and Concepts
3.3.2 Subjective and Psychological Lexis
3.4 Descriptive or Evaluative Lexis
3.5 Summary
Chapter Four A Pragmatic Approach to Vagueness in Law
4.1 Grice's Cooperative Principle
4.2 Application of Cooperative Principle in the Analysis
4.3 Flouting Maxim of Manner
4.4 Politeness and Face
4.5 Pragmatic Functions of Vagueness in Legal Language
4.6 Summary
Chapter Five Conclusion
Bibliography
本文编号：3932525
【文章页数】：68 页
【学位级别】：硕士
【文章目录】：
Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Research Background
1.2 Significance of the Research
1.3 Data Selection
1.4 Methodology
Chapter Two Literature Review
2.1 Vagueness Associated with Sorites Paradox and Fuzzy Logic
2.2 Explaining Vagueness in the Context of Semantics
2.2.1 Semantics and Vagueness
2.2.2 Ruth M. Kempson's Categorization
2.3 Legal Language
2.3.1 Relationship between Language and Law
2.3.2 Linguistic Features of Legal Language
2.3.3 Sources of Vagueness in Legal Language
2.4 Previous Research in the Field of Vagueness in Legal Language
2.4.1 Timothy's Standard View
2.4.2 H.L.A. Hart's Open-texture Theory
2.4.3 Ronald Dworkin's Theory of Adjudication
2.5 Summary
Chapter Three Linguistic Realization of Vagueness in Legal Language—in Semantic Perspective
3.1 Model for Categorization of Hedge in Legal Language
3.1.1 Definition of Hedge
3.1.2 Categorization of Hedges
3.2 Model for Analyzing Hedges in Legal Language
3.2.1 Shields
3.2.1.1 Modal Auxiliaries
3.2.1.2 Probability Adverbs and Their Derivative Adjectives
3.2.2 Approximators
3.2.2.1 Adaptors
3.2.2.2 Rounders
3.2.3 Findings about Hedges Used in Legal Documents
3.3 General orAbstract Lexis.
3.3.1 Abstract Legal Terminology and Concepts
3.3.2 Subjective and Psychological Lexis
3.4 Descriptive or Evaluative Lexis
3.5 Summary
Chapter Four A Pragmatic Approach to Vagueness in Law
4.1 Grice's Cooperative Principle
4.2 Application of Cooperative Principle in the Analysis
4.3 Flouting Maxim of Manner
4.4 Politeness and Face
4.5 Pragmatic Functions of Vagueness in Legal Language
4.6 Summary
Chapter Five Conclusion
Bibliography
本文编号：3932525
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/3932525.html
