当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 公司法论文 >

董事对公司债权人责任的案例分析

发布时间:2018-07-03 19:15

  本文选题:公司法案例 + 公司治理结构 ; 参考:《兰州大学》2010年硕士论文


【摘要】: 董事制度是公司治理结构的核心,董事责任制度又是董事制度的重中之重。董事的义务与责任是学者关心的热点问题,但学者的目光多聚集在董事对公司的责任身上,较少涉及董事对债权人的责任。这一状况与我国公司法在制定董事责任制度时过于强调董事对公司的责任,而忽视董事对债权人的责任不无关系。本文旨在对董事对公司债权人的责任进行探析,以期完善我国董事责任制度,加强对董事的规制和债权人利益的保护,本文的研究内容分为以下五个部分: 第一章董事对公司债权人责任承担的案例 本部分选取了两个关于董事对公司债权人责任承担的案例,分别是我国的伟发服装公司诉明达玩具公司侵犯注册商标专用权纠纷案和美国的弗朗西斯诉联合泽西银行案。 第二章两案涉及的公司法理论 董事对债权人的侵权事件屡屡发生,可传统公司法与现代公司法对董事是否对公司债权人承担民事责任有着不同的认识。当前,为了维护市场交易安全和保护公司利益,董事对债权人承担民事责任已是非常必要的制度。 第三章董事对公司债权人责任承担的立法与司法实践 通过考察两大法系中各国关于董事对公司债权人承担责任的立法例和司法实践,发现当今世界各国公司法日趋重视公司自身利益与社会利益的平衡,确立这一责任形式是与当代公司立法发展趋向相一致的;对我国相关法律规定进行了分析,发现我国部分立法中对这一制度虽已有突破,但仍有不足。 第四章董事对公司债权人责任承担的法律性质 董事对公司债权人责任承担的性质在两大法系有不同的认识,但也有相通之处。通过全面解析,发现董事的这一责任本质上是一种侵权责任。 第五章两案对完善我国相关法律之启示 通过相关案例的分析,本部分从派生诉讼制度的引进和完善、董事承担责任的形式和归责原则以及董事责任限制等方面进行阐述,并对完善我国董事对债权人责任制度提出了相关建议。
[Abstract]:The director system is the core of the corporate governance structure, and the director responsibility system is the most important part of the director system. The duties and responsibilities of directors are hot issues concerned by scholars, but most of them focus on the responsibility of directors to the company, less on the responsibility of directors to creditors. This situation has something to do with the fact that the company law of our country emphasizes the director's responsibility to the company and neglects the director's responsibility to the creditor when formulating the director's liability system. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the liability of directors to the creditors of the company, in order to perfect the liability system of directors in China, strengthen the regulation of directors and protect the interests of creditors. The research content of this paper is divided into the following five parts: the first chapter is the case of the directors' liability to the creditors of the company. This part selects two parts about the directors' responsibility to the creditors of the company Cases of liability, China's Weinfa Garment Company v. Minda Toy Company infringes the exclusive right to use the registered trademark case and the United States case of Francis v. Bank of Jersey. The second chapter two cases involve the company law theory director to the creditor torts the incident to occur frequently, but the traditional company law and the modern company law have the different understanding to whether the director bears the civil liability to the company creditor. At present, in order to safeguard the security of market transactions and protect the interests of companies, it is necessary for directors to bear civil liability to creditors. The third chapter: the legislation and judicial practice of the directors' liability to the creditors of the company. Through the investigation of the legislation and judicial practice of the directors' liability to the creditors of the company in the two legal systems, It is found that the company law of various countries in the world is paying more and more attention to the balance between the interests of the company itself and the interests of the society, and the establishment of this responsibility form is consistent with the development trend of the contemporary company legislation, and the relevant laws and regulations of our country are analyzed. It is found that although there has been a breakthrough in some legislation of our country, there are still some deficiencies. The fourth chapter: the legal nature of the directors' liability to the creditors of the company; the nature of the liability of the directors to the creditors of the company has different understandings in the two legal systems, but there are also similarities. Through comprehensive analysis, it is found that the director's liability is essentially a tort liability. Chapter five: the inspiration of the two cases to the improvement of the relevant laws in China. Through the analysis of relevant cases, this part introduces and perfects the derivative litigation system. This paper expounds the forms and principles of directors' liability and the limitation of directors' liability, and puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the system of directors' liability to creditors.
【学位授予单位】:兰州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D922.291.91

【引证文献】

相关硕士学位论文 前5条

1 边蕊;论董事对公司债权人的责任[D];中国政法大学;2012年

2 王磊;论我国公司法对中小股东权益的完善[D];山西财经大学;2012年

3 熊宇文;公司董事对公司债权人责任法律制度研究[D];扬州大学;2012年

4 周文慧;论董事对第三人责任[D];山东大学;2013年

5 张媛媛;董事对第三人损害赔偿责任研究[D];华东师范大学;2013年



本文编号:2094719

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2094719.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户0e84c***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com