一人公司中债权人利益保护的法律问题研究
发布时间：2018-08-10 21:46
【摘要】：立法承认一人公司的地位之前,一人公司是以事实上的公司形态所存在的。后来,随着实质意义上的一人公司大量涌现,在社会经济活动中起到了一定的作用,这时各国的公司法才逐渐接受这一特殊的公司的形态。一人公司是指公司的股份或出资全部归属于单一股东的公司,我国对一人公司的立法态度也经历了从否定到肯定的过程,直到在2006年新修改的公司法中才正式确立其法律地位。一人公司的产生,是现代社会经济发展的必然产物,符合社会生产力的发展要求。一人公司与传统的普通公司最大区别的就在于股东的唯一性,它的出现对传统的公司法律制度理论形成了很大的冲击。在我国,一人公司的产生和设立有着重要的意义,它有利于鼓励投资创业、积累资金、发展经济和增加就业。但是,由于一人公司股东的唯一性和责任的有限性,容易导致一人公司中唯一股东在有限责任制和公司独立人格这两大保护伞下,在所有权和经营管理权相融合下为谋取个人私利而滥用权利,从而使债权人利益受到损失的可能性大大增加。因此,为了保护一人公司债权人利益,降低交易的风险,必须对一人公司进行相应的法律规制,建立完善的债权人利益保护制度。本文针对这一课题,以我国新公司法确认一人公司合法地位为背景,以其存在优势和产生的弊端为切入点,阐释一人公司对债权人利益产生的侵害及保护的必要性。通过两大法系典型国家对一人公司债权人法律保护的比较分析,总结其先进的经验,具体研究我国一人公司债权人利益法律保护制度的不足及存在的问题,并相应提出一些具有操作性的措施,以更好的保护债权人的利益。 本文除了导论和结论以外,正文由五部分构成。 第一部分为一人公司概述。本部分从一人公司的概念及法律特征这一内容为基本切入点入手,在分析基本理论的基础上,总结出一人公司在社会经济中存在的价值。结合一人公司独特的特性,总结出一人公司存在的优势和弊端,从而揭示并引出一个根本问题:一人公司这一特殊形态在债权人利益保护方面应该作出一个特殊的法律规定。 第二部分为一人公司对债权人利益的侵害。本部分以第一部分为基石,在此基础上重点分析并阐述了一人公司这一特殊形态给债权人利益造成的侵害。由此部分得出的结论,提出一人公司下债权人利益保护的必要性,为以下几个部分的论述提供强有力的支持。 第三部分为国外一人公司中债权人利益保护法律规制的借鉴。通过此部分的论述可以看出两大法系典型代表国家对债权人利益保护的独特性,并由此分析其独特性,借鉴其对一人人公司债权人利益保护的先进经验,为完善我国的立法提供提供有力的支持。 第四部分为我国新公司法对一人公司债权人利益保护规定及不足。这一部分简要的阐述了我国一人公司对债权人利益保护的法律规定,重点对我国立法对一人公司债权人利益保护规定的不足之处进行了详细的阐述,从而为第五部分的立法完善奠定基础。 第五部分是完善我国一人公司债权人利益保护的法律构想。这一部分是以第三、第四部分为理论基础,总结和借鉴各国的一人公司债权人利益法律保护制度的先进经验,从而得出完善我国一人公司债权人利益法律保护制度的具体措施。
[Abstract]:Before the legislation recognizes the status of one-man company, one-man company exists in the form of de facto company. Later, with the emergence of one-man company in substantial sense, which plays a certain role in social and economic activities, the company law of various countries gradually accepts this special form of company. The company whose share or capital contribution is entirely owned by a single shareholder has undergone a process from negation to affirmation of one-man company's legislative attitude, and its legal status has not been formally established until the newly revised Company Law in 2006. The emergence of one-man company is an inevitable outcome of the development of modern social economy and conforms to the development of social productive forces. The biggest difference between one-man company and traditional ordinary company lies in the uniqueness of shareholders. Its appearance has a great impact on the traditional company legal system theory. In our country, the emergence and establishment of one-man company is of great significance. It is conducive to encouraging investment and entrepreneurship, accumulating funds, developing economy and increasing employment. Owing to the uniqueness of the shareholders and the limitation of the liability of the one-man company, it is easy to lead to the abuse of the rights of the sole shareholder in one-man company under the umbrella of the limited liability system and the independent personality of the company in order to seek personal interests under the combination of ownership and management rights, thus greatly increasing the possibility of the loss of the interests of the creditors. Therefore, in order to protect the interests of creditors of one-man company and reduce the risk of transaction, it is necessary to regulate one-man company and establish a perfect system of protecting the interests of creditors. Through the comparative analysis of the legal protection of one-man company creditors in the typical countries of the two legal systems, this paper sums up their advanced experience, studies the deficiencies and existing problems of the legal protection system of one-man company creditors'interests in China, and puts forward some corresponding suggestions. Measures to better protect the interests of creditors.
In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the text consists of five parts.
The first part is an overview of one-man company.Starting with the concept and legal characteristics of one-man company as the basic breakthrough point,this part summarizes the value of one-man company in social economy on the basis of the analysis of basic theories.Combining with the unique characteristics of one-man company,it summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of one-man company,thus revealing the advantages and disadvantages of one-man company. A fundamental problem is that the special form of one-man company should make a special legal provision on the protection of creditors'interests.
The second part is the infringement of one-man company on the creditor's interests. The first part is the cornerstone of this part. On the basis of this part, the author focuses on the analysis and elaboration of the infringement of one-man company on the creditor's interests caused by this special form of one-man company. The discussion provides strong support.
The third part is the reference of the legal regulation on the protection of creditor's interests in one-man company abroad.Through the discussion of this part,we can see the uniqueness of the protection of creditor's interests in the typical representative countries of the two legal systems,and analyze its uniqueness,draw lessons from its advanced experience on the protection of creditor's interests in one-man company,in order to perfect our legislation. Provide strong support.
The fourth part is the provisions and deficiencies of the new company law of our country on the protection of the creditors'interests of one-man company.This part briefly expounds the legal provisions on the protection of the creditors' interests of one-man company in our country,and mainly expounds the deficiencies of the provisions on the protection of the creditors'interests of one-man company in our country's legislation,so as to make the fifth part And lay the foundation for legislative improvement.
The fifth part is the legal conception of perfecting the protection of creditors'interests of one-man company in our country.This part is based on the third and fourth parts, summarizes and draws lessons from the advanced experience of the legal protection system of one-man company creditors' interests of various countries, and then draws the concrete measures of perfecting the legal protection system of creditors'interests of one-man company in our country.
【学位授予单位】：山西财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91
本文编号：2176301
[Abstract]:Before the legislation recognizes the status of one-man company, one-man company exists in the form of de facto company. Later, with the emergence of one-man company in substantial sense, which plays a certain role in social and economic activities, the company law of various countries gradually accepts this special form of company. The company whose share or capital contribution is entirely owned by a single shareholder has undergone a process from negation to affirmation of one-man company's legislative attitude, and its legal status has not been formally established until the newly revised Company Law in 2006. The emergence of one-man company is an inevitable outcome of the development of modern social economy and conforms to the development of social productive forces. The biggest difference between one-man company and traditional ordinary company lies in the uniqueness of shareholders. Its appearance has a great impact on the traditional company legal system theory. In our country, the emergence and establishment of one-man company is of great significance. It is conducive to encouraging investment and entrepreneurship, accumulating funds, developing economy and increasing employment. Owing to the uniqueness of the shareholders and the limitation of the liability of the one-man company, it is easy to lead to the abuse of the rights of the sole shareholder in one-man company under the umbrella of the limited liability system and the independent personality of the company in order to seek personal interests under the combination of ownership and management rights, thus greatly increasing the possibility of the loss of the interests of the creditors. Therefore, in order to protect the interests of creditors of one-man company and reduce the risk of transaction, it is necessary to regulate one-man company and establish a perfect system of protecting the interests of creditors. Through the comparative analysis of the legal protection of one-man company creditors in the typical countries of the two legal systems, this paper sums up their advanced experience, studies the deficiencies and existing problems of the legal protection system of one-man company creditors'interests in China, and puts forward some corresponding suggestions. Measures to better protect the interests of creditors.
In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the text consists of five parts.
The first part is an overview of one-man company.Starting with the concept and legal characteristics of one-man company as the basic breakthrough point,this part summarizes the value of one-man company in social economy on the basis of the analysis of basic theories.Combining with the unique characteristics of one-man company,it summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of one-man company,thus revealing the advantages and disadvantages of one-man company. A fundamental problem is that the special form of one-man company should make a special legal provision on the protection of creditors'interests.
The second part is the infringement of one-man company on the creditor's interests. The first part is the cornerstone of this part. On the basis of this part, the author focuses on the analysis and elaboration of the infringement of one-man company on the creditor's interests caused by this special form of one-man company. The discussion provides strong support.
The third part is the reference of the legal regulation on the protection of creditor's interests in one-man company abroad.Through the discussion of this part,we can see the uniqueness of the protection of creditor's interests in the typical representative countries of the two legal systems,and analyze its uniqueness,draw lessons from its advanced experience on the protection of creditor's interests in one-man company,in order to perfect our legislation. Provide strong support.
The fourth part is the provisions and deficiencies of the new company law of our country on the protection of the creditors'interests of one-man company.This part briefly expounds the legal provisions on the protection of the creditors' interests of one-man company in our country,and mainly expounds the deficiencies of the provisions on the protection of the creditors'interests of one-man company in our country's legislation,so as to make the fifth part And lay the foundation for legislative improvement.
The fifth part is the legal conception of perfecting the protection of creditors'interests of one-man company in our country.This part is based on the third and fourth parts, summarizes and draws lessons from the advanced experience of the legal protection system of one-man company creditors' interests of various countries, and then draws the concrete measures of perfecting the legal protection system of creditors'interests of one-man company in our country.
【学位授予单位】：山西财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 苏鹏飞;刘胜题;;一人公司的有关法律初探[J];法制与经济;1997年06期
2 李苑;;浅议我国一人公司法人人格否认制度[J];法制与社会;2008年07期
3 刘道云;;一人公司债权人利益的潜在风险防范[J];法制与社会;2009年13期
4 党惠涵;;剖视我国一人有限责任公司现行立法的缺陷——完善债权人利益保护法律制度的思考[J];法制与社会;2009年13期
5 苏一星;关于我国“一人公司”的立法思考[J];甘肃社会科学;2002年06期
6 黄邦道;;一人公司债权人利益的法律保护[J];经营与管理;2009年02期
7 田志毅;马千里;;从保护债权人利益角度浅谈保证风险防范[J];铁路采购与物流;2008年11期
8 范健,赵敏;论公司法中的严格责任制度[J];中国法学;1995年04期
9 徐静;;我国一人公司债权人利益保护机制构想[J];中国商贸;2009年11期
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 刘敏;一人公司人格否认制度法律问题研究[D];中国政法大学;2007年
2 黄朝为;中法两国一人有限责任公司制度比较研究[D];华东政法大学;2008年
3 卢艳宁;一人公司债权人利益的法律保护[D];广西大学;2008年
4 袁圣兰;一人公司债权人利益的法律保护[D];贵州大学;2008年
5 肖艳华;揭开“一人公司”面纱[D];暨南大学;2008年
6 熊晓颖;一人自然人公司股东权滥用研究[D];中国政法大学;2008年
7 陈莹;论我国一人公司制度的完善[D];中国政法大学;2008年
8 费晓洁;一人公司之债权人利益保护[D];中国政法大学;2008年
9 常亮;论我国有限责任公司股东资格的认定[D];中国政法大学;2008年
10 吉旺晟;公司法人人格否认制度适用问题研究[D];复旦大学;2008年
，本文编号：2176301
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2176301.html
