论企业法人目的范围之意义——私法和公法的不同角度

发布时间：2018-08-13 13:24

【摘要】：对我国现行法律中对企业法人目的范围的限制作了多角度的分析。从公司法来看 ,早期确立的“越围原则”在后来的发展中已被证明对于保护股东和债权人利益之不力。从民法的一般原理看 ,对企业法人目的范围的限制 ,本质上是对企业法人之法定代表人的代表权的限制 ,与企业法人行为之效力无关。站在公法的角度 ,目的范围之决定是企业法人的当然权利 ,国家权力的过多干预将有悖于社会主义市场经济的基本精神。
[Abstract]:This paper analyzes the limitation of the scope of the purpose of the enterprise legal person in the current law of our country. From the company law, the early established "the principle of circumference" has been proved to be ineffective in protecting the interests of shareholders and creditors in the later development. From the general principle of the civil law, the limitation of the scope of the purpose of the enterprise legal person is essentially the restriction on the representation of the legal representative of the enterprise legal person, and it has nothing to do with the validity of the enterprise legal person's act. From the angle of public law, the decision of the scope of the purpose is the natural right of the enterprise legal person, and the excessive interference of the state power will run counter to the basic spirit of the socialist market economy.
【作者单位】：暨南大学法学院暨南大学管理学院
【分类号】：D922.29

【相似文献】