股份有限公司章程限制股份转让合理性探讨
发布时间：2018-08-16 18:38
【摘要】：基于非此即彼的理论预设,我国公司法在立法过程中片面强调了有限责任公司和股份有限公司的区分,并且将其机械对应于英美法存在于理论分类中的封闭公司和公众公司,导致了实然的公司法与应然公司法律关系的脱节,以立法者的主观判断取代了商事活动者的判断,不仅背离了现代公司法的发展趋势,同时也限制了人们对商事组织形式选择的范围。因此,本文建议未来公司法修改中增加"允许章程限制股份转让"的条款为必然选择,同时应做好相关配套规则的制定。
[Abstract]:Based on the theoretical presupposition of either one or the other, in the process of legislation, the company law of our country emphasizes the distinction between limited liability company and joint stock limited company one-sidedly, and corresponds its machinery to closed company and public company which exist in the theoretical classification of Anglo-American law. It leads to the disconnection between the actual company law and the ought company law. The subjective judgment of the legislator replaces the judgment of the commercial activists, which not only deviates from the development trend of the modern company law. At the same time, it also limits the scope of people's choice of the form of commercial organization. Therefore, this paper suggests that the article of "allowing articles of association to restrict the transfer of shares" should be added to the future company law amendment as an inevitable choice, and at the same time, the relevant supporting rules should be formulated.
【作者单位】： 深圳证券交易所综合研究所;
【分类号】：F426.88
[Abstract]:Based on the theoretical presupposition of either one or the other, in the process of legislation, the company law of our country emphasizes the distinction between limited liability company and joint stock limited company one-sidedly, and corresponds its machinery to closed company and public company which exist in the theoretical classification of Anglo-American law. It leads to the disconnection between the actual company law and the ought company law. The subjective judgment of the legislator replaces the judgment of the commercial activists, which not only deviates from the development trend of the modern company law. At the same time, it also limits the scope of people's choice of the form of commercial organization. Therefore, this paper suggests that the article of "allowing articles of association to restrict the transfer of shares" should be added to the future company law amendment as an inevitable choice, and at the same time, the relevant supporting rules should be formulated.
【作者单位】： 深圳证券交易所综合研究所;
【分类号】：F426.88
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘燕;;新《公司法》的资本公积补亏禁令评析[J];中国法学;2006年06期
2 罗培新;;填补公司合同“缝隙”——司法介入公司运作的一个分析框架[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年01期
3 王红;公司章程变更法律探析——从动因和规制层面[J];北京化工大学学报(社会科学版);2004年01期
4 杨继;公司董事“注意义务”与“忠实义务”辨[J];比较法研究;2003年03期
5 薄燕娜;;公司立法理念的选择——以中西法律传统比较为视角[J];比较法研究;2006年03期
6 林q谛，
本文编号：2186842
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2186842.html
