团结情感、私人裁决与法院行动——公司内解决纠纷之规范结构

发布时间：2018-09-06 06:16

【摘要】：团结乃人类社会之"既存事实"和本性,公司内部纠纷解决机制的安排也应适应社会团结的需要,尽力促进团结功能的实现。近年来,注重凸显"个体自由与权利"的公司法改革,客观上已产生"激化矛盾"、"挑起诉讼"的效果,影响了公司内部效率性团结的实现。为维护团结,法律似应公开承认公司机构对内部纠纷的"预先裁决权",以此压抑不必要的诉讼,和平化解公司内部矛盾。在公司内部纠纷解决中,法院只是一种必要的、但非必不可少、更非首当其冲的机制。团体法的制度设计要尊重和维护团体自解纠纷的能力,贯彻内部裁判优先原则,不能仅仅寄望于以外部机制解决内部问题。也许,我们应该反思现行规则是否适合我们生存的这个时代?——在公司纠纷的内部解决上,我们还需打破"诉讼迷信主义",从规范结构上展开一场"团结性的"变革或解释。
[Abstract]:Solidarity is the "existent fact" and nature of human society. The arrangement of dispute resolution mechanism within a company should also meet the needs of social solidarity and try to promote the realization of the function of solidarity. In order to safeguard the unity, the law should publicly recognize the "pre-adjudication power" of the corporation to internal disputes, so as to suppress unnecessary lawsuits and peacefully resolve internal contradictions. We should respect and safeguard the ability of a group to resolve disputes by itself, and implement the principle of priority of internal adjudication. We should not only hope to solve internal problems by external mechanisms. Perhaps we should reflect on whether the existing rules are suitable for our survival in this era? - In the internal settlement of corporate disputes, we also need to break the "litigation superstition doctrine", and follow the principle of priority of internal adjudication. There is a "solidarity" change or interpretation in the normative structure.
【作者单位】：北京大学法学院;
【基金】：2008年度国家法治与法学理论研究项目“公司诉讼中的民事、行政程序交错研究”(08SFB3021)
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】