论隐名出资行为的法律规制及立法完善
发布时间：2018-10-11 19:43
【摘要】：有限责任公司隐名出资原先作为一种非法律倡导的股权安排形式，，很难在成文法体系中获取预先构建的制度范本，然而，私法自治的理念又赋予了隐名出资的设计安排以足够的自我繁育和发展的空间，本文依托《公司法司法解释三》，力图为隐名出资与信托机制搭建较为顺畅的制度桥梁。 开篇以针对性案例，展示隐名出资由于缺乏成熟的法律机制作为支撑，导致了公司管理权恶意争夺的不利局面；为了厘清隐名出资不同法律基础的争论，笔者对比了不同法系针对股权安排的分析进路，选取了与隐名出资最相接近的被代理人身份不公开的代理制度作为分析样本，以该制度与商事外观主义的冲突来否认代理机制作为隐名出资法律基础的可行性，将目光转换至信托与隐名出资的契合，并以股权信托作为二者联系的制度结晶。 以信托原理对隐名出资纠纷进行回放式处理，发觉相关纠纷的解决不再依靠概念的生硬界定以及分散法律规范的规制，而是依靠信托制度对财产出资至财产隔离保护进行完整的法律调整；为实现隐名出资协议的信托改造，笔者分析了明示信托与推定信托的不同适用前提及具体适用方式，并简单阐释了基于信托的双方权利义务；文章的最后，笔者从隐名出资信托框架本身及对外登记的效力两个方面，提出了完善隐名出资规制的建议，并在股权信托尚不完善时，建议加强实际出资人的请求权。
[Abstract]:As a non-legal form of equity arrangement, it is difficult for limited liability companies to obtain a pre-constructed model system in the statutory law system. However, The idea of autonomy of private law also gives sufficient room for self-breeding and development in the design arrangement of anonymous capital contribution. This paper tries to build a smooth institutional bridge between anonymous capital contribution and trust mechanism based on the explanation of Company Law III. At the beginning of the article, it shows that anonymous capital contribution is supported by the lack of mature legal mechanism, which leads to the unfavorable situation of maliciously competing for the management right of the company; in order to clarify the dispute of different legal basis of anonymous capital contribution, The author compares the approaches of different legal systems to the analysis of equity arrangements, and selects the agent system, which is the closest to the anonymous capital contribution, as the analysis sample. Based on the conflict between this system and commercial factionalism, this paper denies the feasibility of agency mechanism as the legal basis of anonymous capital contribution, and turns its attention to the agreement between trust and anonymous capital contribution, and regards equity trust as the institutional crystallization of their connection. Based on the principle of trust, it is found that the resolution of related disputes no longer depends on the rigid definition of the concept and the regulation of scattered legal norms. In order to realize the trust transformation of the anonymous investment agreement, the author analyzes the different applicable premise and the concrete application mode of the explicit trust and the presumed trust. At the end of the article, the author puts forward some suggestions to perfect the regulation of anonymous investment from the two aspects of the framework of anonymous trust and the effectiveness of external registration, and when the equity trust is not perfect, the author gives a brief explanation of the rights and obligations of both parties based on trust. It is suggested that the right of claim of actual investors should be strengthened.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.291.91
本文编号：2265019
[Abstract]:As a non-legal form of equity arrangement, it is difficult for limited liability companies to obtain a pre-constructed model system in the statutory law system. However, The idea of autonomy of private law also gives sufficient room for self-breeding and development in the design arrangement of anonymous capital contribution. This paper tries to build a smooth institutional bridge between anonymous capital contribution and trust mechanism based on the explanation of Company Law III. At the beginning of the article, it shows that anonymous capital contribution is supported by the lack of mature legal mechanism, which leads to the unfavorable situation of maliciously competing for the management right of the company; in order to clarify the dispute of different legal basis of anonymous capital contribution, The author compares the approaches of different legal systems to the analysis of equity arrangements, and selects the agent system, which is the closest to the anonymous capital contribution, as the analysis sample. Based on the conflict between this system and commercial factionalism, this paper denies the feasibility of agency mechanism as the legal basis of anonymous capital contribution, and turns its attention to the agreement between trust and anonymous capital contribution, and regards equity trust as the institutional crystallization of their connection. Based on the principle of trust, it is found that the resolution of related disputes no longer depends on the rigid definition of the concept and the regulation of scattered legal norms. In order to realize the trust transformation of the anonymous investment agreement, the author analyzes the different applicable premise and the concrete application mode of the explicit trust and the presumed trust. At the end of the article, the author puts forward some suggestions to perfect the regulation of anonymous investment from the two aspects of the framework of anonymous trust and the effectiveness of external registration, and when the equity trust is not perfect, the author gives a brief explanation of the rights and obligations of both parties based on trust. It is suggested that the right of claim of actual investors should be strengthened.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.291.91
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 罗培新;;填补公司合同“缝隙”——司法介入公司运作的一个分析框架[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年01期
2 高富平;代理概念及其立法的比较研究[J];比较法研究;1997年02期
3 王晋;简论公司经理权力的约束[J];商业研究;2003年19期
4 康慧;评我国法学界对诚实信用原则的研究[J];当代法学;2003年04期
5 姜作文;耿佳宁;;公司章程自治与公司法强制性规范的界限[J];大庆师范学院学报;2009年04期
6 高翔;论英美法中本人身份不公开之代理[J];福建公安高等专科学校学报;2005年04期
7 虞政平;股东资格的法律确认[J];法律适用;2003年08期
8 明盛华;;论有限责任公司“挂名”股东股东资格的确认 以一起案件为例的实证研究[J];法律适用;2007年09期
9 刘韶华;;有限责任公司隐名出资协议法律性质的信托法解析[J];法律适用;2011年06期
10 朱广新;;信赖保护理论及其研究述评[J];法商研究;2007年06期
本文编号：2265019
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2265019.html
