法定资本制:诠释、问题、检讨——从公司不同参与人的利益冲突与衡量观察

发布时间：2018-10-15 18:20

【摘要】：本文透过探讨法定资本制在我国、欧盟和美国公司法中的不同理解与诠释,检讨这一制度所共存的问题,旨在揭示:1.法定资本制即为确定资本制这一论断,并非是两大法系公司法的共识,法定资本制与授权资本制也非在时间上次第地更迭;2.法定资本规则未能给制度设计当初拟保护的群体以切实的关怀,同时,使得不应受益的群体从中得利,是一种高成本、低效率的保护债权人模式,是一虚幻的迷宫和失败的主张;3.公司法改革的正当理念直接影响公司资本制改革的成败,否则,片面地主张"从法定资本到授权资本",我们只会从一个虚幻,步入另一虚幻,走出一个迷宫,进入了另一个迷宫。
[Abstract]:By discussing the different understandings and interpretations of statutory capital system in China, EU and USA, this paper reviews the coexistence of this system in order to reveal the following: 1. The conclusion that statutory capital system is the determination of capital system is not the consensus of the two legal systems, and the statutory capital system and authorized capital system do not change in the second place in time; 2. The statutory capital rules fail to give practical care to the groups originally intended to be protected by the system, and at the same time, it is a high cost and low efficiency mode of protecting creditors that does not benefit those who should not benefit from it. Is an illusory maze and a failed proposition; 3. The legitimate concept of company law reform directly affects the success or failure of the reform of the company's capital system. Otherwise, if we unilaterally advocate "from legal capital to authorized capital", we will only move from one illusory to another illusory, and walk out of a maze. Into another labyrinth.
【作者单位】：吉林大学法学院;
【分类号】：D912.29

【共引文献】