公司人格否认直索责任范围研究

发布时间：2018-11-14 17:12

【摘要】：作为构建现代公司的两大基石的独立法人资格和股东有限责任已经受到理论和实践的挑战,而公司人格否认制度比较完美的弥补它们所存在的缺陷。如今,学界通说认为公司人格否认制度的适用范围不仅仅局限于人格滥用,人格混同也成为可适用的情形,这也得到了司法实践的普遍认可。然而,基于公平正义原则和诚信原则建立的公司人格否认制度,在直索责任范围的具体承担问题上,不管是在理论界还是在司法实务界,相关的探讨可谓是少之又少,特别是在同一股东或者控制人控制下的关联企业. 通过对我国有关直索责任承担案例的比较分析,结合对直索责任理论方面的探讨,深入研究直索责任范围承担问题,特别是在同一股东或控制人控制下的关联企业在揭开面纱后,责任如何承担的问题。本文认为,在此情况下,首先得查明实际控制人是否有滥用公司独立人格和股东有限责任的行为。在存在上述行为的情况下,作为权利滥用者的实际控制人,也应成为责任的实际承担者。其次,为充分保障债权人债权、平衡新的利益冲突、实现权利义务对等和公司人格否认的价值理念,并保证经济社会交易的安全和经济持续的稳定有序,法院应该查明股东或者控制人实际财产状况。如果控制人的财产足以满足债权人,则直接追究股东或者控制人的无限连带责任,不再对其他姐妹公司追究无限连带责任；反之,为充分保障债权人的债权得以实现,使失衡的利益分配体系得以恢复,在股东或者控制人无法清偿所有债务时,则应要求其他姐妹公司对共同股东或控制人不能清偿的部分承担无限连带责任。
[Abstract]:The independent legal personality and limited liability of shareholders, which are the two cornerstones of constructing modern companies, have been challenged by theory and practice, and the system of corporate personality denial makes up their defects perfectly. Nowadays, scholars generally think that the scope of application of corporate personality denial system is not limited to the abuse of personality, personality confusion is also applicable, which has been generally recognized in judicial practice. However, the system of corporate personality denial based on the principle of fairness and justice and the principle of good faith, in the specific undertaking of the scope of direct liability, whether in theory or judicial practice, is rarely discussed. Especially affiliated enterprises under the control of the same shareholder or controller. Through the comparative analysis of the cases concerning the liability of straight claims in China and the discussion on the theory of liability of straight claims, this paper makes a deep study on the scope of liability of straight claims. Especially how to bear the responsibility of the affiliated enterprises under the control of the same shareholder or controller after lifting the veil. In this case, we must first find out whether the actual controller has abused the independent personality of the company and the limited liability of shareholders. In the presence of such acts, the actual controller, as the abuser of rights, should also be the actual duty bearers. Secondly, in order to fully protect creditors' claims, balance new conflicts of interest, realize the value concept of equal rights and obligations and denial of corporate personality, and ensure the security of economic and social transactions and the sustained stability and order of the economy, The court shall ascertain the actual property of the shareholder or controller. If the property of the controller is sufficient to satisfy the creditors, the shareholders or the controller will be directly investigated for the unlimited joint and several liability, and no longer the unlimited joint and several liability for the other sister companies; Conversely, in order to fully guarantee the realization of creditors' claims and restore the unbalanced benefit distribution system, when shareholders or controllers are unable to pay off all their debts, Other sister companies should be held jointly and severally liable for parts of the joint shareholders or controllers that cannot be repaid.
【学位授予单位】：南京大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】