公司法人格混同的理论和判例研究
发布时间：2018-11-29 07:28
【摘要】：人格混同在国内外的司法实践中都有着大量的适用,尤其在我国。笔者试图运用相关理论学说和司法判例对人格混同进行分析和研究。本文共分为6个部分：引言部分主要介绍了本文选题的目的和研究方法。第二部分对人格混同进行了概述,界定了人格混同的内涵,以及简单阐述了人格混同产生的缘由。第三部分着重分析人格混同的理论基础,以美国、德国和日本的相关学说为基础进行分析,发现人格混同的理论基础主要有美国的代理说、企业整体说和另一个自我说,德国的客观滥用说以及日本的中义说。第四部分着重以案例为主,探究了人格混同在国外司法中的实践情况,得出需要综合考虑人格因素的各个方面进行认定人格混同的结论,并且财产混同和业务混同是认定人格混同的核心标准。第五部分以36个样本判决为中心,着墨分析和研究了人格混同在我国司法实践中的适用情形,并通过个案分析和数据统计等多角度的研究,认为人格混同的认定标准主要是财产混同、业务混同和人员混同,适格被告和责任主体应是公司股东和相关责任主体(如姐妹公司或母子公司的关联方),甚至实际控制人在特定情形下,也应作为适格被告和责任主体,与此同时,笔者还探讨了人格混同案例的举证责任分配问题以及《公司法》第20条在判决中的适用情况。最后的结语部分,笔者建议认定人格混同时需要慎重,应在达到难以区分股东与公司、姐妹公司或母子公司之间的独立性,方可适用,以防法院滥用人格混同来否认公司法人人格。
[Abstract]:Personality mixing has a great deal of application in judicial practice at home and abroad, especially in our country. The author tries to use relevant theories and judicial precedents to analyze and study personality mixing. This paper is divided into six parts: the introduction mainly introduces the purpose and research methods of this paper. The second part summarizes personality mixing, defines the connotation of personality mixing, and briefly expounds the reason of personality mixing. The third part focuses on the theoretical basis of personality mixing, based on the relevant theories of the United States, Germany and Japan. It is found that the theoretical basis of personality mixing mainly includes the agency theory of the United States, the theory of enterprise as a whole and another theory of self. The objective abuse theory in Germany and the Chinese meaning theory in Japan. The fourth part focuses on cases, explores the practice of personality mixing in foreign justice, and draws the conclusion that it is necessary to consider all aspects of personality factors to identify personality mixing. And property mixing and business mixing is the core standard of personality mixing. The fifth part takes 36 sample judgments as the center, analyzes and studies the application of personality mixing in judicial practice in China, and through case analysis and data statistics and other multi-angle research. It is considered that the standard of identification of personality confusion is mainly property mixing, business mixing and personnel mixing. The appropriate defendant and the subject of responsibility should be the shareholders of the company and the related subject of responsibility (such as the related party of the sister company or the parent subsidiary company). Even the actual controller should be the appropriate defendant and the subject of responsibility under certain circumstances. At the same time, the author also discusses the distribution of the burden of proof in the case of mixed personality and the application of Article 20 of Company Law in the judgment. In the last part of the conclusion, the author suggests that the personality mix should be considered carefully, and it should be applied only when it is difficult to distinguish the independence between the shareholders and the company, the sister company or the parent-subsidiary company. In case the court abuses the personality mix to deny the corporate personality.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91
本文编号：2364320
[Abstract]:Personality mixing has a great deal of application in judicial practice at home and abroad, especially in our country. The author tries to use relevant theories and judicial precedents to analyze and study personality mixing. This paper is divided into six parts: the introduction mainly introduces the purpose and research methods of this paper. The second part summarizes personality mixing, defines the connotation of personality mixing, and briefly expounds the reason of personality mixing. The third part focuses on the theoretical basis of personality mixing, based on the relevant theories of the United States, Germany and Japan. It is found that the theoretical basis of personality mixing mainly includes the agency theory of the United States, the theory of enterprise as a whole and another theory of self. The objective abuse theory in Germany and the Chinese meaning theory in Japan. The fourth part focuses on cases, explores the practice of personality mixing in foreign justice, and draws the conclusion that it is necessary to consider all aspects of personality factors to identify personality mixing. And property mixing and business mixing is the core standard of personality mixing. The fifth part takes 36 sample judgments as the center, analyzes and studies the application of personality mixing in judicial practice in China, and through case analysis and data statistics and other multi-angle research. It is considered that the standard of identification of personality confusion is mainly property mixing, business mixing and personnel mixing. The appropriate defendant and the subject of responsibility should be the shareholders of the company and the related subject of responsibility (such as the related party of the sister company or the parent subsidiary company). Even the actual controller should be the appropriate defendant and the subject of responsibility under certain circumstances. At the same time, the author also discusses the distribution of the burden of proof in the case of mixed personality and the application of Article 20 of Company Law in the judgment. In the last part of the conclusion, the author suggests that the personality mix should be considered carefully, and it should be applied only when it is difficult to distinguish the independence between the shareholders and the company, the sister company or the parent-subsidiary company. In case the court abuses the personality mix to deny the corporate personality.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张兄来;李希;;公司法人人格否认制度的适用范围[J];华东经济管理;2006年01期
2 王雁;;论一人公司中法人人格否认制度的适用[J];和田师范专科学校学报;2007年04期
3 朱慈蕴;;公司法人格否认：从法条跃入实践[J];清华法学;2007年02期
4 周继红;浅谈日本的公司法人格否认之法理[J];青海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2001年02期
5 刘贵祥;法人人格否认理论与审判实务[J];人民司法;2001年09期
6 皮轶之;;公司法人人格否认刍议[J];四川教育学院学报;2006年03期
7 李凡;;试论法人格否认法理中的“人格混同”——日本法近期判例的启示[J];河南省政法管理干部学院学报;2007年05期
8 刘惠明;日本公司法上的法人人格否认法理及其应用[J];环球法律评论;2004年01期
9 范健,赵敏;论公司法中的严格责任制度[J];中国法学;1995年04期
10 孟勤国,张素华;公司法人人格否认理论与股东有限责任[J];中国法学;2004年03期
，本文编号：2364320
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2364320.html
