中国中期期货公司股东派生诉讼案件法律分析
发布时间：2019-03-14 07:42
【摘要】： 股东代表诉讼在英美国家创设产生已有百余年的历史,在公司及其中小股东权益受到侵害时,由股东代替公司提起诉讼的一种特殊救济制度。我国公司法律制度直至2005年10月27日修订的新《公司法》才首次引入该制度。必须承认,在股东派生诉讼的问题上,已经发表了相当数量的专著或者期刊分析的文章。但我们仍然有理由深入探讨这个冲突性和复杂性都很强的题目。股东代表诉讼制度作为法律制度设计上保护中小股东利益的最后一道防线,它要作为一项能真正发挥其实际功效的诉讼法律制度,必然离不开具体而细致的规则和程序方面的考证和设计。 本文通过详细研究中国中期期货案件,以一种实务和比较的视角对股东代表诉讼制度的价值加以考量,对其制度设计进行反思和研究,最终试图对我国新《公司法》刚刚确立的这一法律制度的更加完善有所补益,以期使其更加具体化、更具操作性,从而更好地发挥其功能。本文以务实的理念和方法为统领,同时运用了系统分析、比较法研究、实证分析、法经济学分析等方法,以用辩证和严谨的逻辑思路完成了全文的案例分析和建构。 本文共分为三个章节。 第一章是关于中国中期期货案件和股东代表诉讼的简单概述。文章首先介绍了中国中期期货案件的来龙去脉,引出股东派生诉讼这个概念,然后界定了股东派生诉讼的概念和特征,再对其赖以存在的法理基础和制度的功能进行了分析,最后对其产生和推广的历史发展进行了简单的论述。 第二章结合中国中期期货案件,分析股东派生诉讼核心内容的境内外的考察,对派生诉讼制度进行法视角的透析。从派生诉讼法律关系的原告资格、被告资格、前置程序、诉讼费用补偿和诉讼防御等五个方面加以深入解析。 第三章是集中于股东代表诉讼的本土化分析。该部分在案例分析的基础上,介绍了我国股东代表诉讼的立法现状和司法实践,并从股东代表诉讼的原告资格、被告资格、激励机制和制约机制的角度出发,提出笔者在此方面的完善现行立法的建议,以期提高股东代表诉讼的实用性。
[Abstract]:Shareholder representative litigation has been established in the United Kingdom and the United States for more than one hundred years. When the rights and interests of the company and its minority shareholders are infringed, shareholders take the place of a special relief system. It is not until the new Company Law revised on October 27, 2005 that the company law system of our country is introduced for the first time. It must be admitted that a considerable number of monographs or journal analyses have been published on shareholder derivative litigation. But we still have reason to explore this conflict and complexity of the topic in depth. As the last line of defense to protect the interests of minority shareholders in the design of the legal system, the shareholder representative litigation system should be regarded as a litigation legal system that can give full play to its actual effect. Must not be separated from specific and detailed rules and procedures of textual research and design. Through a detailed study of China's medium-term futures cases, this paper considers the value of shareholder representative litigation system from a practical and comparative perspective, and rethinks and studies its system design. Finally, the author tries to make up for the perfection of this legal system just established by the new Company Law of our country, in order to make it more concrete and operational, so as to give full play to its function. Under the guidance of pragmatic ideas and methods, this paper uses the methods of systematic analysis, comparative law research, empirical analysis, law and economics analysis, etc., to complete the case analysis and construction of the full text with dialectical and rigorous logic train of thought. This paper is divided into three chapters. The first chapter is a brief overview of China's medium-term futures cases and shareholder representative litigation. This paper first introduces the origin and context of China's medium-term futures cases, introduces the concept of shareholder derivative litigation, then defines the concept and characteristics of shareholder derivative litigation, and then analyzes the legal basis and the function of the system on which it exists. Finally, the historical development of its emergence and promotion is simply discussed. The second chapter analyzes the core contents of shareholder derivative litigation and analyzes the derivative litigation system from the perspective of law, combining with the medium term futures cases in China, this chapter analyzes the core contents of shareholder derivative litigation at home and abroad. From the derived litigation legal relations plaintiff qualification, defendant qualification, pre-procedure, litigation costs compensation and litigation defense and other five aspects of in-depth analysis. The third chapter focuses on the localization analysis of shareholder representative litigation. On the basis of case analysis, this part introduces the current legislative situation and judicial practice of shareholder representative litigation in China, and starts from the angles of plaintiff qualification, defendant qualification, incentive mechanism and restriction mechanism of shareholder representative litigation. The author puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the current legislation in order to improve the practicability of shareholder representative litigation.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D922.291.91
本文编号：2439783
[Abstract]:Shareholder representative litigation has been established in the United Kingdom and the United States for more than one hundred years. When the rights and interests of the company and its minority shareholders are infringed, shareholders take the place of a special relief system. It is not until the new Company Law revised on October 27, 2005 that the company law system of our country is introduced for the first time. It must be admitted that a considerable number of monographs or journal analyses have been published on shareholder derivative litigation. But we still have reason to explore this conflict and complexity of the topic in depth. As the last line of defense to protect the interests of minority shareholders in the design of the legal system, the shareholder representative litigation system should be regarded as a litigation legal system that can give full play to its actual effect. Must not be separated from specific and detailed rules and procedures of textual research and design. Through a detailed study of China's medium-term futures cases, this paper considers the value of shareholder representative litigation system from a practical and comparative perspective, and rethinks and studies its system design. Finally, the author tries to make up for the perfection of this legal system just established by the new Company Law of our country, in order to make it more concrete and operational, so as to give full play to its function. Under the guidance of pragmatic ideas and methods, this paper uses the methods of systematic analysis, comparative law research, empirical analysis, law and economics analysis, etc., to complete the case analysis and construction of the full text with dialectical and rigorous logic train of thought. This paper is divided into three chapters. The first chapter is a brief overview of China's medium-term futures cases and shareholder representative litigation. This paper first introduces the origin and context of China's medium-term futures cases, introduces the concept of shareholder derivative litigation, then defines the concept and characteristics of shareholder derivative litigation, and then analyzes the legal basis and the function of the system on which it exists. Finally, the historical development of its emergence and promotion is simply discussed. The second chapter analyzes the core contents of shareholder derivative litigation and analyzes the derivative litigation system from the perspective of law, combining with the medium term futures cases in China, this chapter analyzes the core contents of shareholder derivative litigation at home and abroad. From the derived litigation legal relations plaintiff qualification, defendant qualification, pre-procedure, litigation costs compensation and litigation defense and other five aspects of in-depth analysis. The third chapter focuses on the localization analysis of shareholder representative litigation. On the basis of case analysis, this part introduces the current legislative situation and judicial practice of shareholder representative litigation in China, and starts from the angles of plaintiff qualification, defendant qualification, incentive mechanism and restriction mechanism of shareholder representative litigation. The author puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the current legislation in order to improve the practicability of shareholder representative litigation.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D922.291.91
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 苏力;当代中国法律中的习惯——一个制定法的透视[J];法学评论;2001年03期
2 宣伟华;股东代表诉讼初探[J];法学;1999年06期
3 罗培新;;新《公司法》框架下的司法裁判困境[J];华东政法学院学报;2006年01期
4 曾培芳,盛建明;英国公司法中的派生诉讼初探──少数股股东权利的救济之一[J];南京理工大学学报(社会科学版);1999年03期
5 张民安;派生诉讼研究[J];法制与社会发展;1998年06期
6 罗培新;股东派生诉讼若干问题探讨[J];学术交流;1999年03期
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 张婷婷;股东代表诉讼制度若干问题研究[D];华东政法大学;2008年
2 张弘;公司法中的股东派生诉讼制度比较研究[D];复旦大学;2008年
3 周习愚;论我国股东派生诉讼制度的完善[D];中国政法大学;2009年
，本文编号：2439783
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2439783.html
