公司僵局的司法对策研究

发布时间：2019-04-21 11:57

【摘要】： 本文以公司僵局的司法救济措施为核心展开研究,公司僵局的出现有很大的必然性,其危害性不仅危及于公司本身,还会影响到其他利害相关者的利益。因此,寻求公司僵局的破解之道是公司法学的重要课题。在2005年新《公司法》中,我国首次引入了公司僵局的司法解散制度,结束了僵局状态中的股东诉讼无门的历史。但仅仅选择这一种以结束公司“生命”为代价的救济措施来应对复杂多样的公司僵局状况是极其不够的,而且司法解散这一制度本身也存在很大缺陷。在完善现有制度的基础上,还应积极探索其他能够有效化解公司僵局的替代性措施。本文共分四个部分,摘要如下: 第一部分是公司僵局的成因和显著危害性。在对公司僵局成因的探讨中,本文总结了造成公司僵局出现的三个主要方面:即公司中主体利益的差异性和封闭公司的人合性;资本多数决表决机制失灵;公司事件的复杂多样性和公司章程、公司法的不完全性。随后,本文简述了公司僵局的状况如果不能及时有效的得到化解,其对多方主体带来的危害都是巨大的。因为公司僵局的持续不仅会直接损害了公司自身的利益,还会导致股东的利益也无法正常实现。除此之外,公司僵局还导致了无辜外部债权人的利益受损,对整个社会和市场都会产生不良影响。第二部分是公司僵局司法救济的合理性及应坚持的原则。之所以允许司法手段介入公司僵局是因为,首先,司法救济是僵局当事方的应有权利使然;其次,化解公司僵局也是司法的固有使命之一。但司法手段介入公司僵局并不是无限制的、随意的,必须要坚持一定的原则,主要包括:自立救济优先原则;主体竭力维持原则;防止股东滥诉解散公司原则;以及做好善后事宜原则。第三部分是我国《公司法》中公司僵局的司法对策及其缺陷。这一部分首先分解了我国法律对司法解散公司的具体规定,然后指出了不仅现有的救济手段存在严重缺陷,而且法律还仅选择了这一种救济措施,没有为当事人提供更多的化解途径。第四部分是我国公司僵局司法对策的完善。该部分不仅对我国法律现有制度存在的缺陷提出了完善建议,还为我国法律提出了化解公司僵局除司法解散公司之外的另两种替代性救济措施。
[Abstract]:This paper focuses on the judicial remedy measures of corporate impasse. The appearance of corporate impasse has great inevitability, and its harm not only endangers the company itself, but also affects the interests of other stakeholders. Therefore, it is an important subject of corporate law to find a way to solve the corporate impasse. In the new Company Law of 2005, the judicial dissolution system of company impasse was introduced for the first time in our country, which brought an end to the history of shareholder litigation in the impasse. However, it is not enough to choose this relief measure at the cost of ending the company's "life" to deal with the complex and diverse corporate impasse, and the system of judicial dissolution itself has a lot of defects. On the basis of improving the existing system, we should actively explore other alternative measures that can effectively resolve the corporate impasse. This paper is divided into four parts, the summary is as follows: the first part is the cause and obvious harmfulness of the company impasse. In the discussion of the causes of corporate impasse, this paper summarizes three main aspects of corporate impasse: the difference of the main interests in the company and the personal identity of the closed company, the failure of the majority voting mechanism of capital, the failure of the voting mechanism of the majority of capital; The complex variety of corporate events and the incompleteness of the company's articles of association and company law. Then, this paper briefly describes the situation of the company impasse if it can not be resolved in a timely and effective manner, it will bring great harm to the multi-party subjects. Because the company stalemate will not only directly damage the company's own interests, but also lead to shareholders' interests can not be realized normally. In addition, the corporate impasse has damaged the interests of innocent external creditors and has a negative impact on society and the market as a whole. The second part is the rationality of the judicial relief of the company impasse and the principles that should be adhered to. The reason why the judicial means are allowed to intervene in the corporate impasse is that, first, judicial relief is the due right of the parties to the impasse, and secondly, the resolution of the corporate impasse is also one of the inherent missions of the justice. However, the judicial means involved in the company deadlock is not unlimited, arbitrary, must adhere to certain principles, including: the principle of self-reliant relief priority; the main body to maintain the principle; prevent shareholders from abusive dissolution of the company principle; And to do a good job of the principles of aftercare. The third part is the judicial countermeasures and defects of corporate impasse in the Company Law of our country. This part first decomposes the specific provisions of our country's law on the judicial dissolution of companies, and then points out that there are not only serious defects in the existing means of relief, but also that the law only chooses this kind of relief measure. There are no more ways to resolve the problem. The fourth part is our country company impasse judicial countermeasure consummation. This part not only puts forward some suggestions to perfect the existing legal system of our country, but also puts forward two alternative relief measures to resolve the company impasse besides judicial dissolution of the company.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【相似文献】