有限责任公司股东优先购买权法律问题研究
发布时间：2019-05-11 03:36
【摘要】：有限责任公司股东的优先购买权在1993年《公司法》以及2005年《公司法》中都有明确规定,体现立法者对于股东优先购买权的保护意愿。然而,股东优先购买权的明确立法规定并没有给股东行使此项权利带来便捷,反而在实务操作中呈现出各种纠纷解决在法律依据上空白的现象,对于股东行使优先购买权的具体界定并不明确。因而,针对股东优先购买权的法律问题研究有着重要的意义和十分的必要性。 本文参看1993年《公司法》第36条的规定,分析出2005年《公司法》第72条关于有限责任公司股东优先购买权规定的不足之处,同时结合2011年《公司法解释(三)》中的细化规定,提出有限责任公司股东优先购买权法律问题研究的主要论题。第一部分主要阐述有限责任公司股东优先购买权的一般原理,分为股东优先购买权的含义及特征,理论基础和赋予有限责任公司股东优先购买权的意义三个小部分,为后文的系统论述做了必要的铺垫；第二部分是针对我国现有的公司立法进而剖析立法上存在的问题,主要提出出资不实股东是否享有优先购买权无明确规定,对股东同意向公司以外的人转让股权的标准的认定不够清楚,对同等条件的界定不够明确三大问题；第三部分是完善我国有限责任公司股东优先购买权的建议,针对第二部分中提出的三大问题,本部分分情况一一展开论述：在主体资格界定方面,就出资不实股东是否享有优先购买权这一问题,分别在虚假出资、抽逃出资、隐名股东三种情形下研究研究股东是否享有优先购买权。关于对股东同意向公司以外的人转让股权的标准认定这一问题,分别对“同意”和“公司以外的人”加以认定,从而对该问题提出具体解决意见。针对同等条件认定这一问题,分别从同等条件的考量因素和决定因素、确定购买股权的第三人时同等条件的认定、未确定购买股权的第三人时同等条件的认定以及同等条件有效期限的认定四个方面加以认定。 文章针对实务操作当中存在的问题展开分析,提出可行性建议,目的在于促进现有公司立法的不断完善与发展。
[Abstract]:The preemptive right of shareholders of limited liability company is clearly stipulated in the Company Law of 1993 and the Company Law of 2005, which reflects the legislator's willingness to protect the preemptive right of shareholders. However, the clear legislative provisions of shareholders' preemptive right do not bring convenience to shareholders in the exercise of this right, on the contrary, there is a blank phenomenon in the legal basis of various dispute resolution in practical operation. The specific definition of the exercise of preemptive rights by shareholders is not clear. Therefore, it is of great significance and necessity to study the legal issues of shareholders' preemptive rights. This paper refers to the provisions of Article 36 of the Company Law of 1993, analyzes the shortcomings of Article 72 of the Company Law of 2005 on the preemptive rights of shareholders of limited liability companies, and combines the detailed provisions of the interpretation (3) of the Company Law of 2011. This paper puts forward the main topics of the research on the legal issues of shareholders' preemptive right of limited liability company. The first part mainly expounds the general principle of the shareholder preemptive right of the limited liability company, which is divided into three parts: the meaning and characteristics of the shareholder preemptive right, the theoretical basis and the significance given to the shareholder preemptive right of the limited liability company. It paves the way for the following systematic discussion. The second part is in view of the existing company legislation in our country and then analyzes the problems existing in the legislation, mainly puts forward whether the shareholders with false capital contribution enjoy the preemptive right is not clearly stipulated. The identification of the criteria for shareholders to agree to transfer shares to people other than the company is not clear enough, and the definition of the same conditions is not clear enough. The third part is the suggestion of perfecting the preemptive right of shareholders of limited liability company in our country. In view of the three major problems put forward in the second part, the division of this part is discussed one by one: in the definition of subject qualification, On the question of whether the shareholders have the preemptive right, this paper studies whether the shareholders enjoy the preemptive right under the three circumstances of false capital contribution, evading capital contribution and anonymous shareholders. With regard to the standard cognizance of shareholders' consent to transfer shares to people outside the company, the "consent" and "persons outside the company" are identified respectively, so as to put forward some concrete solutions to the problem. In view of the problem of the identification of the same conditions, the determination of the same conditions when determining the third party who buys the shares is determined from the considerations and determining factors of the same conditions, respectively. The cognizance of the same conditions and the validity period of the same conditions are determined when the third party who buys the shares is not determined. This paper analyzes the problems existing in the practical operation and puts forward some feasible suggestions in order to promote the continuous improvement and development of the existing company legislation.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D922.291.91
本文编号：2474218
[Abstract]:The preemptive right of shareholders of limited liability company is clearly stipulated in the Company Law of 1993 and the Company Law of 2005, which reflects the legislator's willingness to protect the preemptive right of shareholders. However, the clear legislative provisions of shareholders' preemptive right do not bring convenience to shareholders in the exercise of this right, on the contrary, there is a blank phenomenon in the legal basis of various dispute resolution in practical operation. The specific definition of the exercise of preemptive rights by shareholders is not clear. Therefore, it is of great significance and necessity to study the legal issues of shareholders' preemptive rights. This paper refers to the provisions of Article 36 of the Company Law of 1993, analyzes the shortcomings of Article 72 of the Company Law of 2005 on the preemptive rights of shareholders of limited liability companies, and combines the detailed provisions of the interpretation (3) of the Company Law of 2011. This paper puts forward the main topics of the research on the legal issues of shareholders' preemptive right of limited liability company. The first part mainly expounds the general principle of the shareholder preemptive right of the limited liability company, which is divided into three parts: the meaning and characteristics of the shareholder preemptive right, the theoretical basis and the significance given to the shareholder preemptive right of the limited liability company. It paves the way for the following systematic discussion. The second part is in view of the existing company legislation in our country and then analyzes the problems existing in the legislation, mainly puts forward whether the shareholders with false capital contribution enjoy the preemptive right is not clearly stipulated. The identification of the criteria for shareholders to agree to transfer shares to people other than the company is not clear enough, and the definition of the same conditions is not clear enough. The third part is the suggestion of perfecting the preemptive right of shareholders of limited liability company in our country. In view of the three major problems put forward in the second part, the division of this part is discussed one by one: in the definition of subject qualification, On the question of whether the shareholders have the preemptive right, this paper studies whether the shareholders enjoy the preemptive right under the three circumstances of false capital contribution, evading capital contribution and anonymous shareholders. With regard to the standard cognizance of shareholders' consent to transfer shares to people outside the company, the "consent" and "persons outside the company" are identified respectively, so as to put forward some concrete solutions to the problem. In view of the problem of the identification of the same conditions, the determination of the same conditions when determining the third party who buys the shares is determined from the considerations and determining factors of the same conditions, respectively. The cognizance of the same conditions and the validity period of the same conditions are determined when the third party who buys the shares is not determined. This paper analyzes the problems existing in the practical operation and puts forward some feasible suggestions in order to promote the continuous improvement and development of the existing company legislation.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D922.291.91
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 周海博;;有限责任公司股东优先购买权制度重构[J];东岳论丛;2010年06期
2 古锡麟;李洪堂;;股权转让若干审判实务问题[J];法律适用;2007年03期
3 陈敦;;论股东优先购买权的行使[J];法律适用;2007年08期
4 明盛华;;论有限责任公司“挂名”股东股东资格的确认 以一起案件为例的实证研究[J];法律适用;2007年09期
5 王保树;“资本维持原则”的发展趋势[J];法商研究;2004年01期
6 王艳丽;;对有限责任公司股权转让制度的再认识——兼评我国新《公司法》相关规定之进步与不足[J];法学;2006年11期
7 周友苏;;试析股东资格认定中的若干法律问题[J];法学;2006年12期
8 范雪飞;;论有限责任公司章程的概念与效力[J];改革与战略;2010年08期
9 王立争;论准民事法律行为[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2004年05期
10 袁锦秀,段方群;股权优先购买权研究:交易成本视角[J];时代法学;2005年03期
，本文编号：2474218
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2474218.html
