关于竞业禁止补偿金制度案例研究
发布时间:2019-06-26 17:28
【摘要】:企业为保护商业秘密,需要限制或禁止劳动者“跳槽”,但劳动者的就业自由权和择业自由权是我国宪法和劳动法的规定,两者之间存在一定的利益冲突,这就需要劳动法律和商业秘密法共同努力在不同利益之间寻找最佳平衡点,以形成利益平衡机制。而科学合理的竞业禁止制度,正是该利益平衡机制的核心。我国法律从不同角度对竞业禁止做出规定,包括《公司法》、《反不正当竞争法》、《劳动合同法》,甚至《刑法》都有相关的规定。 而在竞业禁止制度的框架中,作为竞业禁止协议的一个重要环节,竞业禁止补偿金的规定对于平衡劳动者和企业之间的利益冲突发挥着非常重要的作用。同时,对于竞业禁止补偿金的效力、数额与支付方法在实践中又往往存在很多的不确定与争议。因此,对于竞业禁止补偿金制度的相关问题的研究,无论是在理论上还是实践上都有相当重要的意义。 本文从三个典型案例入手,结合相关法律、法规,以及国内外的司法实践对我国竞业禁止补偿金的效力、数额与支付方法这些问题进行了探讨,在解析我国相关法律制度和实践方面不足的同时,提出个人的一些合理化建议。
[Abstract]:In order to protect trade secrets, enterprises need to restrict or prohibit workers from "changing jobs". However, the right to freedom of employment and the right to choose a job are the provisions of the Constitution and labor law of our country. There is a certain conflict of interest between the two, which requires the labor law and trade secret law to work together to find the best balance between different interests in order to form the balance mechanism of interests. The scientific and reasonable prohibition system of competition is the core of the interest balance mechanism. The laws of our country stipulate the prohibition of competition from different angles, including the Company Law, the Anti-unfair Competition Law, the Labor contract Law and even the Criminal Law. In the framework of the system of prohibition of competition, as an important link of the agreement of prohibition of competition, the stipulation of compensation for prohibition of competition plays a very important role in balancing the conflict of interests between workers and enterprises. At the same time, there are often many uncertainties and disputes between the amount and the payment method for the effectiveness of the non-competition compensation. Therefore, the study of the compensation system of non-competition is of great significance both in theory and in practice. Starting with three typical cases, combined with relevant laws and regulations, as well as judicial practice at home and abroad, this paper probes into the effectiveness, amount and payment methods of compensation for non-competition in our country, and puts forward some reasonable suggestions for individuals while analyzing the shortcomings of the relevant legal systems and practices in our country.
【学位授予单位】:上海交通大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D922.5
本文编号:2506348
[Abstract]:In order to protect trade secrets, enterprises need to restrict or prohibit workers from "changing jobs". However, the right to freedom of employment and the right to choose a job are the provisions of the Constitution and labor law of our country. There is a certain conflict of interest between the two, which requires the labor law and trade secret law to work together to find the best balance between different interests in order to form the balance mechanism of interests. The scientific and reasonable prohibition system of competition is the core of the interest balance mechanism. The laws of our country stipulate the prohibition of competition from different angles, including the Company Law, the Anti-unfair Competition Law, the Labor contract Law and even the Criminal Law. In the framework of the system of prohibition of competition, as an important link of the agreement of prohibition of competition, the stipulation of compensation for prohibition of competition plays a very important role in balancing the conflict of interests between workers and enterprises. At the same time, there are often many uncertainties and disputes between the amount and the payment method for the effectiveness of the non-competition compensation. Therefore, the study of the compensation system of non-competition is of great significance both in theory and in practice. Starting with three typical cases, combined with relevant laws and regulations, as well as judicial practice at home and abroad, this paper probes into the effectiveness, amount and payment methods of compensation for non-competition in our country, and puts forward some reasonable suggestions for individuals while analyzing the shortcomings of the relevant legal systems and practices in our country.
【学位授予单位】:上海交通大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D922.5
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 徐朝贤;商业秘密竞业限制合同探论[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;1999年03期
2 郑启福;竞业禁止协议的效力研究[J];湖北社会科学;2005年08期
3 桂菊平;竞业禁止若干法律问题研究[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);2001年01期
4 叶静漪;任学敏;;我国竞业限制制度的构建[J];法学杂志;2006年04期
5 陈利花;;对竞业禁止相关问题的法律探析[J];法制与经济(下旬刊);2009年02期
6 常健,饶常林;试论商业秘密保护中的竞业禁止[J];广播电视大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2002年01期
7 张成立;;论竞业禁止的法律规制——劳动权与商业秘密权冲突之协调[J];改革与战略;2007年05期
8 张耕;人才流动中的商业秘密保护研究[J];河北法学;2003年03期
9 李博文;;关于劳动者离职后竞业禁止的几个问题分析[J];和田师范专科学校学报;2008年06期
10 徐芳宁;;竞业禁止之违约责任与侵权责任之比较[J];陕西理工学院学报(社会科学版);2006年04期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 王斗斗;[N];法制日报;2007年
2 宋伟锋;[N];云南经济日报;2001年
,本文编号:2506348
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2506348.html