论有限责任公司股东权滥用之内部赔偿救济——兼析《公司法》第20条第2款的适用
发布时间：2019-06-27 07:22
【摘要】：《公司法》第20条第2款首次对股东权滥用之内部赔偿救济作了较为原则性的规定,由此也引发了较多的困惑和争论。本文从一起较为典型的案例入手,针对当前司法实务界关于股东权滥用之内部赔偿救济的保守态度,论证了这一救济方式在规范公司运作中的价值和现实意义。关于这一救济方式的具体适用,本文认为,应从滥用股东权的内涵、滥用股东权的认定与公司自治之平衡、滥用股东权赔偿救济与其他救济途径的关系等方面,作出综合的判断衡量。
[Abstract]:Article 20, paragraph 2, of the Company Law provides for the first time that the internal compensation relief for the abuse of shareholders' rights is more in principle, which also leads to more confusion and debate. Starting with a typical case, this paper demonstrates the value and practical significance of this relief method in standardizing the operation of the company in view of the conservative attitude of the judicial practice on the internal compensation relief for the abuse of shareholders' right. With regard to the specific application of this relief method, this paper holds that we should make a comprehensive judgment and measurement from the aspects of the connotation of abuse of shareholders' rights, the balance between the identification of abuse of shareholders' rights and corporate autonomy, and the relationship between compensation relief for abuse of shareholders' rights and other remedies.
【作者单位】： 上海市静安区人民法院;复旦大学;
【分类号】：D922.291.91
[Abstract]:Article 20, paragraph 2, of the Company Law provides for the first time that the internal compensation relief for the abuse of shareholders' rights is more in principle, which also leads to more confusion and debate. Starting with a typical case, this paper demonstrates the value and practical significance of this relief method in standardizing the operation of the company in view of the conservative attitude of the judicial practice on the internal compensation relief for the abuse of shareholders' right. With regard to the specific application of this relief method, this paper holds that we should make a comprehensive judgment and measurement from the aspects of the connotation of abuse of shareholders' rights, the balance between the identification of abuse of shareholders' rights and corporate autonomy, and the relationship between compensation relief for abuse of shareholders' rights and other remedies.
【作者单位】： 上海市静安区人民法院;复旦大学;
【分类号】：D922.291.91
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 朱慈蕴;资本多数决原则与控制股东的诚信义务[J];法学研究;2004年04期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 朱黎霞;;试论违反出资义务民事责任之承担——兼评最高院《关于适用〈公司法〉若干问题的规定(三)》(征求意见稿)之第三部分[J];安徽广播电视大学学报;2010年03期
2 冯永强;;公司性质的争议:从视角组合的角度分析[J];安徽工业大学学报(社会科学版);2010年01期
3 郑承志;以现代产权制度支撑有效的公司治理[J];安徽商贸职业技术学院学报(社会科学版);2004年02期
4 y嚭烀，
本文编号：2506602
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2506602.html
