论环境侵权责任构成中违法性要件之定位

发布时间：2018-01-24 03:41

本文关键词： 环境侵权违法性责任构成　出处：《暨南大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在环境侵权责任构成中,违法性要件是否能够成为环境侵权民事责任的构成要件一直来都是个颇具争议的问题。持否定观点的学者认为环境侵权民事责任的构成只需要损害行为、损害结果及行为与结果之间存在因果关系即可。’另一部分的学者主张违法性要件不可舍弃,相对于持否定观点学者的主张违法性要件应作为环境侵权民事责任构成的要件。无论是采取“否定论”还是“肯定论”都没有很好的诠释违法性要件在环境侵权中的作用和定位。随着社会不断在发展,人们的行为也在不断的调整变化。违法性要件有助于法律调整人们不断变化的行为,为行为人的自由划定空间,同时在大量边缘性的案件中,体现出其适应变化的魅力,为法官提供断案的依据。笔者认为在环境侵权中违法性要件不应该舍弃,无论是从违法性要件的功能,还是认定侵权责任,违法性要件都有其独立存在的必要性。违法性要件是一个开放性的侵权行为责任构成要件,在侵权领域中有着不可替代的作用。
[Abstract]:In the constitution of environmental tort liability. Whether the illegal elements can become the constituent elements of environmental tort civil liability has always been a controversial issue. Scholars who hold a negative view that the constitution of environmental tort civil liability only need damage behavior. There is a causal relationship between the result of damage and the behavior and the result. The other part of the scholars advocate that the illegal elements should not be abandoned. The illegal elements should be regarded as the elements of environmental tort civil liability. Neither "negation" nor "affirmation" has a good interpretation of the role and orientation of illegal elements in environmental tort. People's behavior is also constantly changing. Illegal elements help the law adjust people's changing behavior, define the space for the freedom of the perpetrator, and at the same time, in a large number of marginal cases. The author thinks that the illegal elements in environmental tort should not be abandoned, whether from the function of illegal elements or to identify tort liability. Illegal elements have their own necessity of independent existence. Illegality is an open constitutive element of tort liability and plays an irreplaceable role in the field of tort.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.68;D923

【相似文献】