环境行政公益诉讼受案范围之实践考察与体系展开

发布时间：2018-03-01 12:33

本文关键词： 环境行政公益诉讼受案范围规范解释体系展开　出处：《政法论丛》2017年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：我国环境行政公益诉讼没有任何制定法依据,相关规则散见于我国全国人大常务委员会、最高人民法院和最高人民检察院制定的规范性文件和内部规章中,仅概括规定其受案范围为在生态环境和资源保护领域负有监督管理职能的行政机关的违法行使职权或不履行法定职责行为。就现实案例实证分析,现行环境行政公益诉讼受案范围较为集中体现为行政不作为。为推动环境行政公益诉讼健康发展,需要通过规则建构和体系解释来明晰环境行政公益诉讼受案范围:在受案范围界定的标准选择上,应当兼顾行为标准和利益标准;在受案范围界定的路径选择上,应当结合《行政诉讼法》和《环境保护法》厘清和解释肯定式的概括与列举规定,细化否定式列举以规范排除事项。
[Abstract]:There is no legal basis for environmental administrative public interest litigation in our country. The relevant rules are scattered in the normative documents and internal regulations formulated by the standing Committee of the National people's Congress, the Supreme people's Court and the Supreme people's Procuratorate. Only the scope of its acceptance is defined as illegal exercise of authority or failure to perform statutory duties of administrative organs with supervisory and managerial functions in the field of ecological environment and resource protection. In order to promote the healthy development of the environmental administrative public welfare litigation, the scope of the current environmental administrative public interest litigation is embodied in the administrative omission. It is necessary to clarify the scope of environmental administrative public interest litigation cases through rules construction and system interpretation: in the selection of the criteria for defining the scope of the cases, the standards of conduct and interests should be taken into account, and the choice of the path of the scope of the cases should be defined. Combining with the Administrative procedure Law and the Environmental Protection Law, we should clarify and explain the general and enumerative provisions of the affirmative form, and refine the negative enumeration to normalize the exclusion of matters.
【作者单位】：华侨大学法学院;
【基金】：福建省社会科学规划特别委托一般项目“环境行政公益诉讼规则体系研究”(FJ2016TWF006)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D922.68;D925.3

【相似文献】