环保部门作原告正合时宜——看大龙潭水污染环境民事公益诉讼案中环保力量

发布时间：2018-03-09 10:03

本文选题：民事公益诉讼　切入点：环保部门　出处：《环境保护》2011年Z1期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：2010年12月13日,全国首例由环保部门提起的环境公益民事侵权诉讼案,在昆明市中级人民法院开庭审理。在本案中,环保局首次作为环境民事公益诉讼的原告参与了诉讼和庭审,而众所周知,在企业污染事件频发的今日,环保部门是否适合作环境民事公益诉讼的原告一直是各界高度关注和反复讨论的问题。随着本案的开庭,热议已久的"环保局能否作原告"问题似乎终于有了定论。然而,环境法学界的同仁们对这一问题的进一步深入思考似乎并未止歇。本着"真理越辩越明"的精神,本期的案例解析,我们邀请了两位对此问题持有不同看法的法学工作者从各自的视角出发,谈一谈"环保局作原告"到底好不好,它好在何处,又欠在哪里?我们希望通过讨论给读者朋友们更宽广的视野、更开阔的思路,为我国环境法治建设贡献些许力量,让环保事业的发展更多、更好地惠及群众。(注:由于两位作者对本案的关注重点不尽相同,他们对本案的命名各自有别。本着尊重作者的态度,本刊保留了他们各自对本案的命名。)
[Abstract]:In December 13th 2010, the first environmental civil tort lawsuit filed by the environmental protection department was heard in the Kunming Intermediate people's Court. In this case, For the first time, the EPA participated in the litigation and court proceedings as a plaintiff in environmental civil public interest litigation, and it is well known that today, when corporate pollution incidents are frequent, The question of whether the environmental protection department is suitable for environmental civil public interest litigation has been a matter of great concern and repeated discussion. With the opening of the case, it seems that the long-debated question whether the EPA can be the plaintiff has finally come to a conclusion. It seems that our colleagues in the field of environmental law have not stopped thinking further on this issue. In the spirit of "truth is more and more clear," this issue of case analysis, We have invited two legal practitioners who have different views on this issue to talk about the merits of "EPA as a plaintiff" from their own perspectives, what is its good and what is owed? We hope that through the discussion, readers will have a broader vision and wider thinking, contribute some strength to the construction of the environmental rule of law in our country, and let the development of environmental protection cause grow more. Better benefit the masses. (note: since the two authors' focus on the case is different, their naming of the case is different. In an attitude of respect to the author, the journal retains their own naming of the case.)
【作者单位】：中国人民大学法学院;昆明理工大学法学院;
【分类号】：D922.68

【相似文献】