当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 环境法论文 >

环境行政不作为研究

发布时间:2018-04-08 23:13

  本文选题:环境行政不作为 切入点:环境行政责任 出处:《辽宁大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:环境行政不作为是行政不作为在环境领域的特殊表现形式,不仅会极大地损害环境行政相对人的合法权益,损害公民的环境权益和社会生态利益,而且会损害政府的形象,影响社会的和谐稳定。虽然近年来我国出台了很多环境保护的法律法规和相关政策,空气、土地、水质的不断恶化以及各地频发的环境污染重大事故从不同角度说明我国环境保护领域的行政不作为的问题仍然没有得到很好的解决。因而,非常有必要对环境行政不作为进行研究,其研究的成果对规范我国环境行政主体的行为,实现可持续性发展有很好的促进作用。 环境行政不作为在我国受到关注较少,相关的系统理论研究也比较缺乏。本文首先通过对环境行政不作为基本理论的研究,说明了环境行政不作为的内涵和表现形式,明确环境行政不作为的隐蔽性、消极性和违法性的特征,,从主体适格、负有法定作为义务、有履行义务的可能、和作为义务的违反四个方面来阐述了构成环境行政不作为的条件;其次通过对国外规制环境行政不作为的研究成果和实践经验的归纳和总结,指出完善法律法规、加强公众参与、健全公益诉讼等方面的借鉴意义;再次阐明环境行政不作为的危害,强调规制环境行政不作为的重要意义。本文通过分析环境行政不作为产生的原因,提出遏制环境行政不作为的对策:通过建立相对独立的环境保护管理系统,合理划分环境行政权力,明确环境行政职责,加大其执法权限从制度上预防环境行政不作为的发生;通过完善公众参与程序、信息公开程序、行政时效制度,使环境行政不作为界定更为清晰,从程序上减少环境行政不作为的发生;通过加大对环境行政不作为的行政和刑事追究力度,促使环境行政主体及其工作人员积极履行环境行政管理的职责;通过扩大环境行政司法审查范围、完善环境公益诉讼制度和环境行政不作为的国家赔偿等方法来健全环境行政不作为的法律救济制度。希望本文能够抛砖引玉,为构建我国环境行政不作为的预防、制裁、补救及赔偿体系,遏制环境行政不作为的发生,保护生态环境发挥积极作用。
[Abstract]:Environmental administration does not act as a special expression in the field of environment , not only can greatly damage the legal rights and interests of the relative people of the environment , harm the environmental rights and interests of the citizens and the social ecological benefits , but also harm the image of the government and the harmonious stability of society .

In this paper , the connotation and form of environmental administrative omission , the hidden nature , the negative polarity and the illegality of the environment administration are clarified by the study of the environment administrative omission as the basic theory , and the conditions of constituting the environment administrative omission are expounded from four aspects : the subject ' s fitness , the possibility to fulfill the obligation , and the breach of the obligation as a breach of the obligation ;
Secondly , by summarizing and summing up the research results and practical experiences of foreign regulatory environment administration , it is pointed out that perfecting the laws and regulations , strengthening the public participation and perfecting the public interest litigation .
In this paper , the author puts forward the countermeasures to curb environmental administrative omission by analyzing the causes of environmental administrative omission : by establishing a relatively independent environmental protection management system , reasonably dividing environmental administrative power , defining environmental administrative functions , and strengthening the law enforcement authority to prevent environmental administrative omission from the system ;
By improving the public participation procedure , the information disclosure procedure and the administrative prescription system , the environmental administration is not defined as clearer and the environmental administrative omission is reduced from the procedure ;
( b ) Promote the active implementation of environmental administrative management responsibilities by the environmental administrative bodies and their staff by increasing administrative and criminal accountability for environmental administration ;
By enlarging the scope of environmental administrative judicial review , perfecting the system of environmental public interest litigation and the non - government compensation of environmental administration , it is hoped that this paper will be able to throw brick and draw the jade , so as to set up the system of prevention , sanction , remedy and compensation of environmental administrative omission in our country , to contain environmental administrative omission , and to protect the ecological environment .

【学位授予单位】:辽宁大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D922.68

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 沈跃东;;试论环境侵权行政赔偿[J];北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版);2008年05期

2 王莹莹;郭永长;;浅议环境行政不作为的法治对策[J];中国司法;2007年07期

3 付艳;;污染事故中行政不作为的赔偿责任研究——以凤翔血铅污染事件为视角[J];法制与社会;2010年11期

4 王莹莹;周玉华;;论环境行政不作为[J];北方经贸;2007年03期

5 李清宇;蔡秉坤;;我国环境行政执法与司法衔接研究[J];甘肃社会科学;2012年03期

6 崔华平;;美国环境公益诉讼制度研究[J];环境保护;2008年24期

7 肖俊;;环境监管法律关系理论解析与立法完善[J];中国环境管理干部学院学报;2010年01期

8 李锴;周辉;;试论我国环境损害赔偿的国家责任[J];江西社会科学;2007年01期

9 王春磊;;我国环境法对环境利益消极保护及其反思[J];暨南学报(哲学社会科学版);2013年06期

10 刘海蓉;;环境行政诉讼证明责任研究[J];社会科学研究;2010年06期



本文编号:1723776

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/huanjingziyuanfa/1723776.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户44e27***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com