当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 环境法论文 >

海洋资源物权之侵权制度研究

发布时间:2018-05-08 11:11

  本文选题:海洋资源侵权 + 海洋资源物权 ; 参考:《兰州大学》2012年硕士论文


【摘要】:海洋对于地球和生命具有至关重要的意义,它是人类赖以生存发展的资源宝库,合理开发和利用海洋资源将是人类解决资源短缺、人口激增等难题的重要出路。本文牢牢抓住“物权”和“侵权”两条主线,透过海洋资源物权制度的视角,对实践中各种侵犯海洋资源物权的行为进行类型化分析,从而为海洋资源侵权行为的有效规范寻求一种制度上的保障。 本文分为五大部分对海洋资源侵权制度进行论述。 第一部分为海洋资源概述。文章从概念和特征入手,揭示出海洋资源的多样性、多重利用性、敏感性等内涵,并以“中海油”事件为视角,对我国现有的海洋资源法律保护体系进行分析,并透视出我国海洋资源法律制度的不足。 第二部分是对海洋资源物权制度的述评。通过对海洋资源所有权、海洋资源用益物权和海洋资源担保物权的分类阐述,探讨了海洋资源物权的取得、变更及消灭。对海洋资源物权的定位是研究海洋资源侵权制度的基础。 第三部分进入海洋资源侵权制度的探讨。文章首先对海洋资源侵权制度的必要性和价值取向进行了论述,提出该制度的建立应当兼顾经济效益和生态效益、救济和预防并重。其次便是对海洋资源侵权理论制度的具体阐述,包括对海洋资源侵权法律关系的阐释、对海洋资源侵权行为的特征和归责原则的论述以及对海洋资源侵权责任的构成要件、免责事由和责任形式的分类探讨,从理论上搭建起海洋资源侵权制度的框架。 第四部分为海洋资源侵权类型的探讨。文章紧紧围绕海洋资源所有权、用益物权和担保物权的内容,对侵犯海洋资源所有权、用益物权、担保物权的侵权行为进行分析归类。 第五部分为海洋资源侵权制度的纠纷解决机制。文章首先对传统的自力救济、社会救济和公力救济三种纠纷解决途径进行论述,其次针对海洋资源侵权损害大、恢复难的现状提出了一些建议。通过对责任保险、环境补偿基金的阐述表明它们对海洋资源侵权的有效救济具有现实意义。
[Abstract]:The ocean is of vital significance to the earth and life. It is the treasure house of human resources for survival and development. The rational exploitation and utilization of marine resources will be an important way out for mankind to solve the problems such as shortage of resources and population explosion. This paper firmly grasps the two main lines of "real right" and "tort", and through the perspective of the system of real right of marine resources, makes a typological analysis of various violations of real right of marine resources in practice. In order to seek a kind of institutional guarantee for the effective norm of the tort of marine resources. This paper is divided into five parts to discuss the tort system of marine resources. The first part is an overview of marine resources. Starting with the concept and characteristics, this paper reveals the connotation of the diversity, multi-utilization and sensitivity of marine resources, and analyzes the existing legal protection system of marine resources in China from the perspective of "Cnooc" incident. And perspective out the lack of legal system of marine resources in China. The second part is a review of the real right system of marine resources. Through the classification and elaboration of the ownership of marine resources, the usufruct of marine resources and the real rights of security of marine resources, this paper discusses the acquisition, change and elimination of the real rights of marine resources. The positioning of the real right of marine resources is the basis of studying the tort system of marine resources. The third part discusses the tort system of marine resources. This paper first discusses the necessity and value orientation of the marine resources tort system, and puts forward that the establishment of the system should pay attention to both economic and ecological benefits, as well as relief and prevention. Secondly, it elaborates the theoretical system of marine resource tort, including the interpretation of the legal relationship of marine resource tort, the characteristics of marine resource tort and the principle of liability, as well as the constitutive elements of marine resource tort liability. This paper discusses the classification of exemption and liability form, and sets up the framework of marine resources tort system theoretically. The fourth part is the discussion of the types of marine resources infringement. Based on the contents of the ownership of marine resources, usufruct and security, this paper analyzes and classifies the infringement of the ownership, usufruct and security of marine resources. The fifth part is the dispute settlement mechanism of marine resources tort system. At first, the paper discusses the traditional methods of self-relief, social relief and public relief, and then puts forward some suggestions on the current situation that the marine resources are damaged by tort and difficult to recover. Through the elaboration of liability insurance and environmental compensation fund, it shows that their effective relief to the infringement of marine resources is of practical significance.
【学位授予单位】:兰州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D923;D922.6

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前4条

1 晋海;不可抗力为环境侵权民事责任免责条件的质疑[J];当代法学;2001年07期

2 高圣平;严之;;海域使用权抵押权的体系定位与制度完善[J];当代法学;2009年04期

3 杨华;王全弟;;围海造地过程中的权利承接及其法律规制[J];法学;2010年07期

4 王明远;相邻关系制度的调整与环境侵权的救济[J];法学研究;1999年03期

相关硕士学位论文 前2条

1 傅聪;海洋资源开发利用法律制度研究[D];中国政法大学;2003年

2 蒋平;我国海洋资源综合开发利用法律问题研究[D];中国海洋大学;2006年



本文编号:1861157

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/huanjingziyuanfa/1861157.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户100a2***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com