区域经济一体化进程中的行政协议研究

发布时间：2018-05-12 08:48

本文选题：区域合作 + 行政协议　；参考：《天津师范大学》2008年硕士论文

【摘要】： 行政协议是在区域经济一体化的进程中,区域政府为克服行政区划障碍而进行合作的法律规制。由于这种协议形式并未有任何的法律、法规予以确认,还处于一种“无政府”状态,没有一定的程序,没有一定的原则,没有对行政协议的限制,更没有协议的违约救济方式。而这些是法律规制所必不可少的东西,因此,对行政协议进行系统的研究就显得尤为迫切与必要。本文从行政协议的历史与现状出发,分析行政协议的文本,指出现在区域合作中行政协议存在哪些问题,然后就存在的问题提出解决的途径。第一章“区域经济一体化进程中的行政协议的历史与现状”阐述了研究行政协议的必要性,通过对行政协议历史的介绍、对行政协议文本的分析,指出行政协议存在的问题。第二章“行政协议基础理论分析”是本文的理论基础部分。介绍了行政协议的概念,通过与民事契约的比较体现出行政协议的特征,从法治基础与制度基础两方面论述行政协议的理论基础。“在行政协议的性质与效力”一节中,从概括性协议与专门性协议两个角度分别论述不同类型的行政协议的性质及效力。本章的最后一节介绍了行政协议的原则,体现了对整个行政协议制度的指导性作用。第三章“行政协议的缔结与履行”首先对行政协议缔结的主体予以分析,第二节对行政协议的程序中几个重要的问题予以论述:行政协议缔结前的准备、行政协议的批准及行政协议的公开。在第三节中介绍行政协议基本条款的内容,接下来两节分析了行政协议的履行方式及在不同的履行方式下责任的归属问题。第四章“行政协议的评价机制”首先论述了在行政协议中引入行政评价机制的意义,然后借鉴日本东京行政评价办法对我国行政协议评价机制的建立提出建议。第五章“行政协议争议解决机制”首先论述排除司法救济途径的理由,在第二节中论述应通过三种解决行政协议争议解决的途径——替代性争议解决机制、模拟法庭和行政复议。最后认为我国应尽快制定行政协议法和行政程序法,修改我国现行的行政复议法。
[Abstract]:In the process of regional economic integration, administrative agreement is the legal regulation of cooperation between regional governments to overcome the obstacles of administrative divisions. Because this kind of agreement form does not have any law, the regulation is confirmed, is still in a kind of "anarchy" state, does not have the certain procedure, does not have the certain principle, does not have the restriction to the administrative agreement, does not have the agreement breach of contract relief way. These are the essential things of legal regulation, so it is urgent and necessary to study the administrative agreement systematically. Starting from the history and present situation of the administrative agreement, this paper analyzes the text of the administrative agreement, points out what problems exist in the administrative agreement in the present regional cooperation, and then puts forward the ways to solve the existing problems. The first chapter, "the history and present situation of administrative agreement in the process of regional economic integration", expounds the necessity of studying administrative agreement. By introducing the history of administrative agreement and analyzing the text of administrative agreement, the author points out the problems existing in administrative agreement. The second chapter is the basic theory analysis of administrative agreement. This paper introduces the concept of administrative agreement, and demonstrates the characteristics of administrative agreement by comparing it with civil contract, and discusses the theoretical basis of administrative agreement from two aspects: the basis of rule of law and the foundation of system. In the section of "Nature and effect of Administrative Agreement", this paper discusses the nature and effect of different types of administrative agreement from two angles of generality agreement and specialized agreement. The last section of this chapter introduces the principles of the administrative agreement, reflecting the guiding role of the whole administrative agreement system. The third chapter, "the conclusion and performance of administrative agreement", firstly analyzes the subject of the conclusion of administrative agreement, and the second section discusses several important problems in the procedure of administrative agreement: the preparation before conclusion of administrative agreement, Approval of administrative agreements and publicity of administrative agreements. In the third section, it introduces the content of the basic clauses of the administrative agreement. The next two sections analyze the performance mode of the administrative agreement and the attribution of the responsibility under the different performance mode. The fourth chapter, "Evaluation mechanism of administrative agreement", first discusses the significance of introducing administrative evaluation mechanism into administrative agreement, and then puts forward some suggestions on the establishment of administrative agreement evaluation mechanism of our country based on Tokyo administrative evaluation method of Japan. The fifth chapter, "dispute settlement mechanism of administrative agreement", first discusses the reasons for excluding judicial remedy, and in the second section, discusses the alternative dispute settlement mechanism, which should be adopted in three ways to resolve administrative agreement dispute. Moot court and administrative review. Finally, the author thinks that our country should make the administrative agreement law and the administrative procedure law as soon as possible, and revise the present administrative reconsideration law of our country.
【学位授予单位】：天津师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：D922.6

【相似文献】