采矿权转让法律实务问题研究

发布时间：2018-06-06 11:39

本文选题：采矿权转让 + 承包　；参考：《内蒙古大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：在整个矿业权交易市场中,采矿权转让是十分重要的部分。随着近几年经济的发展和政府的扶持,采矿权转让市场的有序建立和发展成为重要议题,不得不承认采矿权转让的相关制度存在许多问题。采矿权转让是物权法上的权利变动,涉及到采矿权主体的变更。采矿权出租中双方当事人是一种债权关系,采矿权抵押在抵押权实现前,虽设定抵押但采矿权主体尚未发生变化。因而本文将单独讨论,不将出租和抵押视为严格意义上的采矿权转让的方式。采矿权市场是矿业市场重要的一环,正确理解和解决采矿权实务中的问题有十分重要的意义。本文由四部分组成。第一部分分析我国采矿权转让立法现状,重点阐述现行立法规定的采矿权转让方式和条件,并对采矿权的出租和抵押进行单独讨论。第二部分结合案例分析当前实践中常见的三种有关采矿权转让的承包合同。第三部分结合案例分析涉矿企业股权转让与采矿权转让的区别。第四部分针对未审批的采矿权转让合同的效力进行论述。通过笔者的研究分析,得出以下结论:第一,只有构成实质转让的承包合同应当被认定为无效;其他形式的承包合同是当事人意思表示一致的结果,应当是有效的。第二,采矿权是矿山企业的资产,股权转让不等同于采矿权转让。第三,未经行政审批的采矿权转让合同属于未生效的合同。
[Abstract]:In the whole mining right trading market, mining right transfer is a very important part. With the economic development and government support in recent years, the orderly establishment and development of mining rights transfer market has become an important issue. The transfer of mining rights is the change of rights in the law of real right, which involves the change of the subject of mining rights. In the lease of mining right, both parties are a kind of creditor's rights relationship. Before the mortgage of mining right is realized, the subject of mining right has not changed though the mortgage has been set. Therefore this article will discuss separately, does not regard the lease and the mortgage as strictly the mining right transfer way. Mining right market is an important part of mining market. It is of great significance to correctly understand and solve the problems in mining right practice. This paper consists of four parts. The first part analyzes the present situation of the legislation on the transfer of mining rights in China, focusing on the mode and conditions of the transfer of mining rights stipulated by the current legislation, and discusses separately the lease and mortgage of mining rights. The second part analyzes three kinds of contract of mining right transfer in current practice. The third part analyzes the difference between equity transfer and mining right transfer. The fourth part discusses the validity of mining right transfer contract without approval. Through the author's research and analysis, the following conclusions are drawn: first, only the contract that constitutes substantive transfer should be considered invalid; other forms of contract are the result of the consistent expression of the intention of the parties and should be effective. Second, mining rights are the assets of mining enterprises, equity transfer is not equal to mining rights transfer. Third, no administrative approval of the transfer of mining rights contracts are not effective contracts.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.2;D922.62

【相似文献】