环境民事纠纷非诉讼解决方式探析

发布时间：2018-06-30 18:40

本文选题：环境 + 环境民事纠纷　；参考：《昆明理工大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】：环境纠纷是时代发展的产物。随着经济的迅猛发展,我国已进入环境纠纷高发阶段。有效解决环境纠纷是目前关注度较高的一个话题。诉讼作为解决环境民事纠纷的主要手段,既扮演着不可替代的重要角色,同时其在现实生活中解决环境民事纠纷的运作情况又暴露出一定的不适性。伴随着环境民事纠纷量与质对诉讼的双重挑战,人们敏锐地发现诉讼对现有环境民事纠纷心有余而力不足,增强了人们对解决纠纷另辟蹊径的决心。尤其是在构建和谐社会理念提出后,诉讼对环境民事纠纷的解决更是受到和谐社会“和”思想的强烈冲击,为诉讼之外其他非诉讼解决方式的研究预留了发展的空间。社会对人们选择权的尊重与人们对纠纷解决理性追求的碰撞使环境民事纠纷非诉讼解决方式有蓬勃发展之势。可以说,内因和外因的结合是环境民事纠纷非诉讼解决方式茁壮成长的催化剂,理论基础和实践结果都无不证明环境民事纠纷非诉讼解决方式的正当性。环境民事纠纷非诉讼解决方式有广阔的运用前景,不仅源于诉讼固有缺陷在环境民事纠纷中的延伸与扩大,更重要的是其自身优势与和谐思想的融合。环境民事纠纷非诉讼解决方式的产生与发展并不是以取代诉讼为目的,而是旨在补充诉讼制度的不足,建立良性互动的多元化纠纷解决机制。本文也正是在这样的思路指导下完成的。把握好环境民事纠纷的特殊性,研究环境民事纠纷非诉讼解决方式,扩大环境民事纠纷解决方式的多样性,提升整个环境民事纠纷解决机制的解纷能力,是环境民事纠纷解决的趋势,也是化解社会不和谐因素的合理举措。但是,环境纠纷非诉讼解决方式发展的可行性并不能消除其实际运行的障碍,人民调解、行政处理等非诉讼解决方式表现出的种种弊端使完善环境纠纷非诉讼解决方式刻不容缓。所幸的是国外对环境民事纠纷非诉讼解决方式的研究较为成熟,为我国完善其制度开拓了一条借鉴之路。本文共分为四个部分。第一部分,对环境民事纠纷与非诉讼纠纷解决方式进行充分阐述,为全篇论文作了铺垫。此部分阐述了环境民事纠纷和非诉讼纠纷解决方式的概念、特征。第二部分,环境民事纠纷非诉讼解决方式概述。论述了环境民事纠纷非诉讼解决方式的产生、主要方式,环境民事纠纷非诉讼解决方式的理论基础和必要性。第三部分,环境民事纠纷非诉讼解决方式的现状和缺陷。从国际上环境纠纷非诉讼解决方式发展比较好的美国和日本入手进行域外考查,发现我国在这方面的缺陷以及借鉴他国的先进经验。第四部分,环境民事纠纷非诉讼解决方式的完善。通过立法、实践中对各种非诉讼纠纷解决方式的具体设计以及相关问题的完善,期待环境民事纠纷非诉讼解决方式成为有机统一、高效运作的解纷体系。
[Abstract]:Environmental disputes are the product of the development of the times. With the rapid development of economy, China has entered the stage of high incidence of environmental disputes. Effective resolution of environmental disputes is a topic of high concern at present. Litigation, as the main means to solve environmental civil disputes, plays an irreplaceable important role, and at the same time, the operation of solving environmental civil disputes in real life reveals some discomfort. With the double challenge of environmental civil dispute quantity and quality, people have found that litigation has more than enough strength to the existing environmental civil dispute, which has strengthened people's determination to find a new way to solve the dispute. Especially after the idea of constructing a harmonious society is put forward, the solution of environmental civil disputes is strongly impacted by the idea of harmonious society "and", which reserves the space for the development of other non-litigation solutions besides litigation. The collision between social respect for people's right to choose and rational pursuit of dispute resolution makes non-litigation solutions to environmental civil disputes flourish. It can be said that the combination of internal and external causes is the catalyst for the development of non-litigation solutions to environmental civil disputes. The theoretical basis and practical results all prove the legitimacy of non-litigation solutions to environmental civil disputes. The non-litigation solution of environmental civil disputes has a broad application prospect, not only from the extension and expansion of inherent defects in environmental civil disputes, but also from the integration of its own advantages and harmonious thoughts. The emergence and development of non-litigation settlement of environmental civil disputes is not to replace litigation, but to supplement the deficiencies of litigation system and to establish a diversified dispute resolution mechanism with benign interaction. This article is also completed under the guidance of such a train of thought. To grasp the particularity of environmental civil disputes, to study non-litigation solutions of environmental civil disputes, to expand the diversity of environmental civil dispute resolution, and to enhance the ability of the whole environmental civil dispute resolution mechanism. It is the trend of environmental civil dispute resolution and a reasonable measure to resolve social disharmony. However, the feasibility of developing non-litigation solutions to environmental disputes cannot eliminate the obstacles to their actual operation. The malpractices of non-litigation solutions such as administrative treatment make it urgent to perfect non-litigation solutions to environmental disputes. Fortunately, the foreign research on non-litigation settlement of environmental civil disputes is more mature, which opens a way for our country to perfect its system. This paper is divided into four parts. In the first part, the environmental civil dispute and non-litigation dispute settlement methods are fully elaborated, which pave the way for the whole paper. This part expounds the concept and characteristics of environmental civil dispute and non-litigation dispute settlement. The second part, the environmental civil dispute non-litigation settlement. This paper discusses the emergence and main ways of non-litigation settlement of environmental civil disputes, and the theoretical basis and necessity of non-litigation settlement of environmental civil disputes. The third part, the environmental civil dispute non-litigation settlement of the status quo and defects. From the perspective of the United States and Japan, which have developed well in the non-litigation settlement of environmental disputes in the world, it is found that our country has defects in this respect and draws lessons from the advanced experience of other countries. The fourth part, the improvement of non-litigation settlement of environmental civil disputes. Through legislation, the specific design of various non-litigation dispute resolution methods and the improvement of related problems in practice, it is expected that the non-litigation settlement of environmental civil disputes will become an organic unified and highly efficient dispute resolution system.
【学位授予单位】：昆明理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D922.6

【参考文献】