基于历史和逻辑相统一方法视域下的物权行为理论研究

发布时间：2018-02-21 11:05

本文关键词： 物权行为历史逻辑　出处：《西南石油大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：我国实施的《物权法》,极大地解放了生产力,促进了市场经济的发展,收到了良好的社会效果。在实践的检验中,《物权法》也逐步凸显出部分局限性,其中最大的缺憾在于忽视了理论的先导和引导作用。“没有革命的理论,就不会有革命的运动”。始终不肯正面肯定物权行为理论的《物权法》,却在处处彰显着物权行为理论的光彩,这不能不说是一种局限。基于此,本文由社会现象入手,介绍了物权行为理论,又运用历史和逻辑相统一的方法客观探究了德国、法国和瑞士对物权行为理论立法渊源,在此基础上用历史和逻辑相统一的方法分析物权行为理论在我国的发展轨迹,得出我国必然采纳物权行为理论的结论,以期为我国物权法的发展略尽绵薄。全文共分五部分,约31000字。第一部分绪论,首先介绍了选题背景与研究意义,概述了物权行为理论的国内外现状,介绍了文章的主要内容、研究思路和研究方法。第二部分精炼而全面的介绍了物权行为理论。从《婚姻法解释三》引起的社会舆论入手,提炼出蕴藏在现象本后的物权行为理论。介绍了物权行为的概念、渊源、特性、与债权行为的区别及三种不同的物权变动立法模式。第三部分按历史发展的脉络介绍了历史和逻辑相统一方法。依次介绍了黑格尔关于历史和逻辑相统一理论的认识、马克思对黑格尔学说的发展和突破和历史和逻辑的辩证统一关系,最后强调了用历史和逻辑相统一的方法分析物权行为理论的方法论意义。第四部分用历史和逻辑相统一的方法分别对德国、法国、瑞士就物权行为理论采取了不同的立法选择进入探究。得出各国立法模式的选择都是本国实际同先进科学理论综合的结果。第五部分将目光转回我国,用历史和逻辑相统一的方法深入的分析和论证了物权行为理论在我国的历史发展过程和逻辑发展轨迹,得出我国立法采纳物权行为理论的必然性,并将理论上的结论与我国现状对比,得出我国物权行为理论的不足,进而得出第六部分的结论,提出完善我国物权行为的建议。
[Abstract]:The implementation of the Real right Law in China has greatly liberated the productive forces, promoted the development of the market economy, and received good social effects. In the examination of practice, the property Law has gradually highlighted some limitations. The biggest drawback is that it ignores the leading and guiding role of theory. "there is no revolutionary theory. There will be no revolutionary movement. "the Real Law, which has always refused to affirm positively the theory of the act of real right, is showing the luster of the theory of the act of real right everywhere. This cannot be said to be a limitation. Based on this, this article begins with social phenomena. This paper introduces the theory of the act of real right, and explores objectively the legislative origin of the theory of the act of real right in Germany, France and Switzerland by using the method of unifying history and logic. On this basis, the author analyzes the development of the theory of act of real right in our country by the method of unifying history and logic, and draws the conclusion that the theory of act of real right must be adopted in our country, in order to do a little bit for the development of real right law of our country. About 31000 words. The first part introduces the background and significance of the topic, summarizes the current situation of the theory of real right act at home and abroad, introduces the main content of the article, research ideas and research methods. The second part introduces the theory of the act of real right in a concise and comprehensive way. Starting from the public opinion caused by the interpretation of the Marriage Law, the author abstracts the theory of the act of real right hidden after the phenomenon, and introduces the concept, origin, characteristics of the act of real right. Different from creditor's rights act and three different legislative modes of real right change. The third part introduces the method of unifying history and logic according to the historical development, and then introduces Hegel's understanding of the theory of unification of history and logic. Marx's development and breakthrough of Hegel's theory and dialectical unity of history and logic. Finally, it emphasizes the methodological significance of analyzing the theory of juristic act of real right by the method of unifying history and logic. 4th parts of the history and logic of the United methods of Germany, France, Switzerland has adopted different legislative choices on the theory of juristic act of real right, and it is concluded that the choice of legislative mode in various countries is the result of the integration of national reality and advanced scientific theory. In the 5th part, we turn our eyes back to our country, analyze and demonstrate the historical development process and logical development track of the theory of real right act in our country with the unified method of history and logic, and get the inevitability of adopting the theory of real right act in legislation of our country. By comparing the theoretical conclusion with the present situation of our country, the author draws the conclusion that the theory of real right act of our country is insufficient, and then draws the conclusion of 6th parts, and puts forward some suggestions to perfect the act of real right in our country.
【学位授予单位】：西南石油大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.2

【参考文献】