论夫妻平等的法律保护
本文关键词: 夫妻平等 法律保护 婚姻法 出处:《长春工业大学》2010年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:本文从夫妻平等的内容和价值出发,对夫妻平等的立法现状和发展趋势进行了深入细致的研究,并在此基础上提出完善我国夫妻平等立法的建议。共分为五个部分: 第一部分,概述夫妻平等的基本理论。在我国宪法男女平等原则的基础上提出了婚姻法中夫妻平等的概念,婚姻法中的夫妻平等,是指夫妻双方在婚姻生活中处有平等的法律地位、享有平等的权利并承担平等的义务。论述了夫妻平等的内容和价值。 第二部分,总结当代婚姻法中夫妻平等立法的发展趋势。回溯历史,婚姻中的夫妻关系经历了由夫妻不平等向夫妻平等演变的发展过程,当代婚姻法废除了以往那些体现夫妻不平等关系的条款,增补了夫妻关系平等的具体内容,将“夫妻平等”明确规定于法律之中。同时,当代婚姻法更加追求对夫妻平等地位的实质保护,在设计具体制度时,首先考虑的因素是能否确保夫妻平等的真正实现。 第三部分,考察域外国家夫妻平等立法的立法模式和具体内容。在以法国、德国、瑞士为代表的大陆法系和以英国、美国为代表的英美法系之间,从夫妻人身权和夫妻财产制两个方面,探讨各国夫妻平等立法的特点。通过比较分析可见,域外国家夫妻平等立法的先进经验及不足之处可以为完善我国夫妻平等立法发挥很好的启示作用。 第四部分,我国的夫妻平等立法。阐述了我国夫妻平等立法的立法现状,梳理了现阶段仍然存在的主要问题:立法结构不合理、缺少有关夫妻同居义务和夫妻日常家事代理权的规定、关于夫妻婚姻住所决定权和夫妻生育权的规定不够明确、缺少夫妻财产关系的通则性规定、约定和法定财产制的具体内容有待补充等。 第五部分,完善我国的夫妻平等立法。在分析我国夫妻平等立法缺陷的基础之上,结合当代夫妻平等立法的发展趋势,借鉴域外国家夫妻平等立法的经验教训,提出了在完善我国夫妻平等立法过程中应遵循的基本原则:“私事原则”、意思自治原则、区别对待原则和均衡原则,从而针对现存问题提出相应的对策建议。首先,调整我国夫妻平等立法的立法结构,将夫妻关系集中、单独地规定到一章之中,凸显婚姻法对夫妻关系的重视。其次,在夫妻人身权方面,增补夫妻同居义务和夫妻日常家事代理权,修改夫妻婚姻住所决定权和夫妻生育权。第三,在夫妻财产制方面,增设通则性规定,增补约定财产制的要件和内容,补充和完善通常法定财产制,增补非常法定财产制。第四,提出设置家庭事务管理机构这样一个职能部门,管理夫妻双方在婚姻生活中出现的矛盾和问题,监督和保障我国夫妻平等的实现程度。
[Abstract]:Starting from the content and value of the equality of husband and wife, this paper makes a thorough and detailed study on the present situation and development trend of the legislation on the equality of husband and wife, and on this basis puts forward some suggestions to perfect the legislation of equality of husband and wife in China. It is divided into five parts:. The first part summarizes the basic theory of equality of husband and wife. On the basis of the principle of equality between men and women in the Constitution of our country, it puts forward the concept of equality of husband and wife in the Marriage Law, the equality of husband and wife in the Marriage Law, It refers to the equal legal status, equal rights and equal obligations of husband and wife in their marital life, and discusses the content and value of the equality of husband and wife. The second part summarizes the development trend of the legislation of equality between husband and wife in the contemporary marriage law. Looking back on history, the relationship between husband and wife in marriage has gone through the development process from the inequality of husband and wife to the equality of husband and wife. The contemporary marriage law repeals the previous provisions that reflect the unequal relationship between husband and wife, adds to the specific content of equality between husband and wife, and explicitly stipulates "equality of husband and wife" in the law. At the same time, The contemporary marriage law pursues the substantive protection of the equal status of husband and wife. When designing the specific system, the first consideration is whether to ensure the real realization of the equality between husband and wife. The third part examines the legislative model and specific content of the legislation on equality between husband and wife in foreign countries, between the civil law system represented by France, Germany and Switzerland, and the common law system represented by the United Kingdom and the United States. From the two aspects of husband and wife's personal rights and marital property system, this paper discusses the characteristics of the legislation on equality of husband and wife in various countries. The advanced experience and deficiency of the legislation on equality of husband and wife in foreign countries can play a very important role in perfecting the legislation of equality of husband and wife in our country. Part 4th, the legislation of equality of husband and wife in our country, expounds the present situation of legislation of equality of husband and wife, combs the main problems that still exist at the present stage: the legislation structure is unreasonable, The lack of provisions on the obligation of cohabitation and the power of daily family affairs agency, the lack of clear provisions on the right to decide the matrimonial domicile and the right of husband and wife to have children, and the lack of a general rule on the property relationship between husband and wife, Agreement and the specific content of legal property system to be supplemented. Part 5th, consummates the husband and wife equality legislation in our country. On the basis of analyzing our country husband and wife equality legislation flaw, unifies the contemporary husband and wife equality legislation development tendency, draws lessons from the extraterritorial country husband and wife equality legislation experience, This paper puts forward the basic principles that should be followed in the process of perfecting the legislation of equality of husband and wife in our country: the principle of "private affairs", the principle of autonomy of will, the principle of differential treatment and the principle of balance, so as to put forward the corresponding countermeasures and suggestions in view of the existing problems. Adjusting the legislative structure of our country's legislation on equality of husband and wife, centralizing the relationship between husband and wife into a single chapter, highlighting the importance attached by the Marriage Law to the relationship between husband and wife. Secondly, in terms of the personal rights of husband and wife, To supplement the obligation of cohabitation and the power of daily household agency, to modify the right to decide the marital domicile and the right of husband and wife to have children. Third, to add general provisions to the system of marital property, and to supplement the elements and contents of the agreed property system. To supplement and improve the usual statutory property system, to supplement the extraordinary legal property system. 4th, to propose the establishment of a family affairs management organ as a functional department to manage the contradictions and problems in marital life between husband and wife. To supervise and guarantee the realization of equality between husband and wife in our country.
【学位授予单位】:长春工业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D923.9
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 梁君思;;以党内监督增进党风廉政建设[J];黄海学术论坛;2011年01期
2 李高雅;;论美法德三国宪法监督制度及对我国的启示[J];湖北成人教育学院学报;2008年05期
3 黄琼;;关于“一撤到底”问题之管见[J];湖北成人教育学院学报;2008年05期
4 林顺虎;袁成钢;;论就业协议设定违约金上限之合理性[J];湖北成人教育学院学报;2010年05期
5 张键;;论我国登记离婚制度[J];湖北成人教育学院学报;2012年02期
6 宇文宏,刘珂;从原初状态到正义原则——评析罗尔斯的契约论证明[J];河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2004年02期
7 矫波;系统思维、可持续发展与法律的公平价值[J];河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年01期
8 郑晓华;达尔的经济民主思想及其论证[J];河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年02期
9 杨秀国;张筱筠;;调查性报道:伦理层面的矛盾体[J];河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年06期
10 宫敬才;;市民社会概念的起源、流变和社会历史基础[J];河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年01期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 王全林;;坚持科学发展观,正视大学发展创新的代价[A];安徽省第五届“兴皖之光”青年学术年会论文集(交叉学科卷)[C];2005年
2 邱国良;郑延恒;;论高校辅导员与大学生的民主沟通[A];2009年全国高校学生工作年会论文集[C];2009年
3 高峰;;社会秩序何以可能?——基于存在论的研究视角[A];2010年中国社会学年会——“社会稳定与危机预警预控管理系统研究”论坛论文集[C];2010年
4 刘阳;;隐私话语的诞生与大众传媒业——一种知识考古学的路径[A];中国传媒大学第五届全国新闻学与传播学博士生学术研讨会论文集[C];2011年
5 李阳;;我国检察官职业道德建设之应然路径与实然选择——以制度建设和检察文化建设为视角[A];第四届国家高级检察官论坛论文集[C];2008年
6 郭云忠;;《最高人民检察院工作报告》的话语变迁[A];第五届国家高级检察官论坛论文集[C];2009年
7 白云;;和谐社会下我国公民法治精神的培育[A];创新思想·科学发展·构建和谐——黑龙江省首届社会科学学术年会优秀论文集上册[C];2008年
8 刘月岭;;康德意志自由的三重境界[A];“第二届中国伦理学青年论坛”暨“首届中国伦理学十大杰出青年学者颁奖大会”论文集[C];2012年
9 张燕;;异种角膜移植的伦理考量[A];“第二届中国伦理学青年论坛”暨“首届中国伦理学十大杰出青年学者颁奖大会”论文集[C];2012年
10 康娜;;论婚姻专有性投资的法律保护[A];2009年度(第七届)中国法经济学论坛论文集[C];2009年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 杨道宇;课程效能生成的原理研究[D];哈尔滨师范大学;2010年
2 晋入勤;企业国有产权交易法律制度创新论[D];华东政法大学;2010年
3 吴一鸣;英美物权法之大陆法解读[D];华东政法大学;2010年
4 郑现U,
本文编号:1551002
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hyflw/1551002.html