“隔代探望”的法理基

发布时间：2018-05-15 21:27

  本文选题：隔代探望 + 法无禁止即可为　； 参考：《法律适用》2017年23期

【摘要】：近年来,隔代探望权争议问题逐渐成为带有普遍性的社会现象。司法实践中存在较大争议,并未形成相对一致的观点。应当认为,隔代探望的主张,在"儿童利益最大"目的、法无禁止即可为的私法自治精神以及情理司法裁判考量等角度均具合理性与必要性。因而,隔代探望应当作为一种相对独立的权利样态予以承认和尊重。但同样需要注意的是,祖父母、外祖父母隔代探望权的主张往往与直接抚养子女的离婚父母一方在生活安宁权上存在权利冲突,故而对隔代探望权而言不能作绝对化的理解,而必须考虑类型化区分。经由归纳,"代位型"与"代为型"隔代探望具备正当基础,且不侵犯协助义务者的安宁权,而"单纯离婚型"的隔代探望诉求,已经被不直接抚养子女离婚父母一方的探望权所包容和吸收,不宜再作为独立的权利样态赋予祖父母或外祖父母。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the issue of intergenerational visitation rights has gradually become a universal social phenomenon. There is a great dispute in judicial practice and there is not a relatively consistent view. It should be considered that the idea of intergenerational visitation is reasonable and necessary from the point of view of "the best interests of the child", the spirit of autonomy in private law without prohibition and the consideration of rational and judicial decisions. Therefore, intergenerational visitation should be recognized and respected as a relatively independent right. However, it is also important to note that grandparents' claim of the right to visit next generation often conflicts with the right to peace of life of one of the divorced parents who directly raise their children. Therefore, the right to visit from another generation cannot be understood in an absolute way. The typological distinction must be considered. By summing up, the "subrogation" and "surrogate" visits have a proper foundation and do not infringe the right of peace of the assisting duty, while the "simple divorce" intergenerational visitation demands. It has been accepted and absorbed by parents who do not directly support their children, and should not be given to grandparents as an independent right.
【作者单位】： 江苏省无锡市中级人民法院;华东政法大学;
【分类号】：D923.9
，

本文编号：1894022