法的确定性与立法语言之选择

发布时间：2018-07-03 14:13

本文选题：法的确定性 + 立法语言　；参考：《山东大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：法的确定性一直以来都是法律人为之追求的目标。而关于法的不确定性的争论也并未停止,相信今后这样的争论还会继续进行下去。本文以法的确定性为切入点,在立法语境下,结合语言学相关理论,探讨法的确定性与立法语言之间的逻辑关系,同时借以《婚姻法》为研究对象,最终在具体操作层面上归纳出如何实现法的确定性的立法语言选择标准。第一部分是介绍立法语境下对法的确定性的界定。首先划定关于法的确定性问题的讨论范围,通过对法律现实主义和语言哲学的评述,得出这样的结论：法的确定性其实就是法律条文经由语言文字所表达的含义具有确定性、客观性,同时更应看到我们所追求的确定是一种相对的确定,以及追求确定性在我国当下的现实意义。承接上文,既然追求法的确定性是立法过程中的重要目标,文章第二部分主要是通过对立法语言的本体研究揭示立法语言与法的确定性的逻辑关系,两者是如何互动、互为影响。作为实现法的确定性的基础和前提,立法语言的语体风格是怎样体现法的确定性；第三部分为文章的主体,以《婚姻法》为范例,探讨立法过程中,立法语言实现法的确定性的语言选择标准,文章最后落脚在制度化的途径归纳中。通过前期资料搜集,笔者发现从各种视角出发研究法的确定性这一问题着实成果丰硕,而对立法语言本体的关注和研究,立法学界和语言学界也在不同层而铺开,但的确很少有将这两个问题联系在一起,从法的确定性与立法语言的逻辑关系这个角度为切入点,这正是本文的创新点所在。本文的逻辑结构开篇涉及理论比较抽象和宏观,行文至主体部分结合具体的法律来论述如何通过立法语言的选择实现法的确定性,最后归纳出实现法的确定性的方法。《婚姻法》既是本文的分析对象又作为一个分析工具,理论与文本相结合,既有说理又有实证,避免将文章写成仅从遣词造句的角度利用语法理论来简单分析立法文本中的语用错误。
[Abstract]:The certainty of law has always been the goal pursued by legal people. And the debate about the uncertainty of law has not stopped, and I believe it will continue in the future. This paper takes the certainty of law as the starting point, in the context of legislation, combining with the relevant theories of linguistics, probes into the logical relationship between the certainty of law and the legislative language, and takes Marriage Law as the object of study. Finally, on the level of concrete operation, it concludes the choice standard of legislative language how to realize the certainty of law. The first part is to introduce the definition of legal certainty in the context of legislation. First of all, the scope of discussion on the certainty of law is defined. Through the comments on legal realism and linguistic philosophy, the conclusion is drawn that the certainty of law is in fact the certainty of the meaning expressed by the text of the law through the language. Objectivity, at the same time, we should see that the determination we seek is a relative certainty, and the realistic significance of seeking certainty in our country. To undertake the above, since the pursuit of legal certainty is an important goal in the legislative process, the second part of the article mainly reveals the logical relationship between the legislative language and the certainty of law through the ontological study of the legislative language, and how the two interact with each other. Influence each other. As the basis and premise of realizing the certainty of the law, how does the style of the legislative language embody the certainty of the law? the third part is the subject of the article, taking the Marriage Law as an example to explore the legislative process. The deterministic language choice standard of legislative language realization law is concluded in the institutionalization approach at the end of the article. Through the early data collection, the author finds that the research on the certainty of law from various perspectives is fruitful, and the attention and research on the ontology of legislative language are also spread in the field of law and linguistics at different levels. However, few of these two problems are linked together, from the angle of legal certainty and the logical relationship between legislative language, which is the innovation of this paper. The logical structure of this paper is related to the abstract and macroscopical theory. The author discusses how to realize the certainty of the law through the choice of legislative language, from the main part to the subject part, combining with the specific law. Finally, it concludes the method of realizing the certainty of the law. Marriage Law is not only the object of this article but also a tool for analysis. The combination of theory and text has both reasoning and demonstration. Avoid writing the article as a simple analysis of pragmatic errors in legislative texts from the perspective of sentence making and grammatical theory.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D90-055

【参考文献】