自然之债视域下夫妻忠诚协议的效力判断
发布时间：2018-07-17 16:07
【摘要】：在现代社会的婚姻关系中,因第三者插足致使婚姻关系破裂的现象正在逐渐增多。秉持在婚姻关系中双方应当相互忠诚的原则,越来越多的夫妻选择以订立夫妻忠诚协议的方式来保护自己的婚姻。对于什么是"夫妻忠诚协议",目前学界还没有统一的概念界定;对于忠诚协议的法律性质,从当前的发展状况来看,属于以身份关系为主并涉及财产关系的无名协议;对于夫妻忠诚协议的法律效力,司法实践中也没有统一的判定标准,导致了诸多同案不同判现象的存在,影响了法律的权威。关于夫妻忠诚协议的纠纷具有较强的家庭属性,司法不适合强行介入,此种情形下引入自然之债这一理论对夫妻忠诚协议进行分析,恰好可以解决夫妻忠诚协议的效力判定问题。
[Abstract]:In modern society, the phenomenon of marriage breakdown caused by the third party is increasing gradually. In accordance with the principle that both parties should be faithful to each other in marriage, more and more couples choose to protect their marriage by entering into a marital loyalty agreement. At present, there is no uniform definition of what is "the agreement of husband and wife loyalty", and the legal nature of the agreement of loyalty belongs to the nameless agreement concerning the relationship of identity and property. As for the legal effect of the agreement of husband and wife loyalty, there is no uniform judgment standard in judicial practice, which leads to the existence of many different judgments in the same case and affects the authority of the law. The dispute about the agreement of husband and wife loyalty has strong family attribute, the judicature is not suitable for forcible intervention, under such circumstances, the theory of natural debt is introduced to analyze the agreement of loyalty of husband and wife. It can solve the validity of the loyalty agreement between husband and wife.
【作者单位】： 黑龙江大学法学院;哈尔滨理工大学法学院;
【基金】：黑龙江省哲学社会科学研究规划项目“自然债权研究”(13C020)
【分类号】：D923.9
本文编号：2130195
[Abstract]:In modern society, the phenomenon of marriage breakdown caused by the third party is increasing gradually. In accordance with the principle that both parties should be faithful to each other in marriage, more and more couples choose to protect their marriage by entering into a marital loyalty agreement. At present, there is no uniform definition of what is "the agreement of husband and wife loyalty", and the legal nature of the agreement of loyalty belongs to the nameless agreement concerning the relationship of identity and property. As for the legal effect of the agreement of husband and wife loyalty, there is no uniform judgment standard in judicial practice, which leads to the existence of many different judgments in the same case and affects the authority of the law. The dispute about the agreement of husband and wife loyalty has strong family attribute, the judicature is not suitable for forcible intervention, under such circumstances, the theory of natural debt is introduced to analyze the agreement of loyalty of husband and wife. It can solve the validity of the loyalty agreement between husband and wife.
【作者单位】： 黑龙江大学法学院;哈尔滨理工大学法学院;
【基金】：黑龙江省哲学社会科学研究规划项目“自然债权研究”(13C020)
【分类号】：D923.9
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 王歌雅;;夫妻忠诚协议:价值认知与效力判断[J];政法论丛;2009年05期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 孙丽萍;无名身份协议之司法对待[D];浙江大学;2013年
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 韩_g博;;自然之债视域下夫妻忠诚协议的效力判断[J];学习与探索;2017年06期
2 王卫峰;;论婚姻忠诚协议的效力[J];法制与社会;2017年15期
3 罗心;;婚姻忠诚协议效力立法规制分析[J];法制博览;2016年18期
4 张选;;浅议夫妻忠诚协议的效力[J];法制博览;2016年17期
5 倪登搬;;夫妻忠诚协议效力研究[J];中南财经政法大学研究生学报;2016年02期
6 曹恩诚;;浅议夫妻忠诚协议的法律效力[J];法制博览;2016年01期
7 史向阳;;浅析夫妻忠诚协议的性质与效力判断[J];法制博览;2015年09期
8 赵申豪;;论夫妻忠诚协议的效力与法律适用[J];重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版);2015年03期
9 高云鹏;;对夫妻“忠诚协议”性质与效力的再思考[J];赤峰学院学报(汉文哲学社会科学版);2014年11期
10 马慧宇;;“忠诚协议”之效力判定[J];呼伦贝尔学院学报;2014年05期
【二级参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 刘涛;;对夫妻忠诚协议的法律思考[J];法制与社会;2007年09期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 周召;论自然之债[D];中国政法大学;2007年
，本文编号：2130195
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hyflw/2130195.html
