保证合同纠纷中保证人配偶对担保之债的责任分析及裁判对策
发布时间：2018-08-26 09:59
【摘要】：在司法实践中,债权人为了保证实现自己的债权,经常会依据婚姻法及其司法解释的相关规定,以夫妻共同债务的名义要求未参与举债的保证人配偶与保证人一并承担责任。由于合同相对性被突破后,审判人员对债权人的利益应当保护到哪种程度把握不定,这种不确定性造成我国目前各地各级人民法院对该问题的裁判结果并不统一。保证合同由于其单务性、无偿性等特性区别于一般的合同,因此担保之债能否作为夫妻共同债务,还应考虑保证人夫妻是否就保证达成一致意见或是否共同受益的因素。在审判过程中,对于上述两个因素关于分配债权人和保证人配偶的举证责任非常重要。因此,平衡保护债权人和保证人配偶的合法权益,合理分配举证责任使双方权利义务相对等是对该类型案件裁判的原则。
[Abstract]:In judicial practice, in order to ensure the realization of their creditor's rights, creditors often require the spouse and guarantor who have not participated in the debt to bear the responsibility in the name of the joint debt of husband and wife according to the relevant provisions of the marriage law and its judicial interpretation. Because of the breach of the relativity of contract, it is uncertain to which extent the judge should protect the interests of creditors. This uncertainty results in the inconsistent adjudication results of people's courts at all levels in our country at present. The guarantee contract is different from the general contract because of its singularity and gratuitous nature, so whether the bond can be regarded as the joint debt of husband and wife, should also consider whether the surety and the surety agree on the guarantee or whether they benefit jointly. In the course of the trial, the burden of proof regarding the distribution of creditors and sponsor spouses is important for the above two factors. Therefore, to balance the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the creditor and the spouse of the guarantor, and to reasonably distribute the burden of proof so that the rights and obligations of both parties are equal is the principle of adjudication of this type of case.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923
本文编号：2204508
[Abstract]:In judicial practice, in order to ensure the realization of their creditor's rights, creditors often require the spouse and guarantor who have not participated in the debt to bear the responsibility in the name of the joint debt of husband and wife according to the relevant provisions of the marriage law and its judicial interpretation. Because of the breach of the relativity of contract, it is uncertain to which extent the judge should protect the interests of creditors. This uncertainty results in the inconsistent adjudication results of people's courts at all levels in our country at present. The guarantee contract is different from the general contract because of its singularity and gratuitous nature, so whether the bond can be regarded as the joint debt of husband and wife, should also consider whether the surety and the surety agree on the guarantee or whether they benefit jointly. In the course of the trial, the burden of proof regarding the distribution of creditors and sponsor spouses is important for the above two factors. Therefore, to balance the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the creditor and the spouse of the guarantor, and to reasonably distribute the burden of proof so that the rights and obligations of both parties are equal is the principle of adjudication of this type of case.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 郁光华;论物的担保之债的经济意义[J];比较法研究;1997年01期
2 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 浙江省湖州市吴兴区人民法院 潘文杰邋冯群安;保证人的配偶应否对担保之债承担责任[N];人民法院报;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 唐群;保证合同纠纷中保证人配偶对担保之债的责任分析及裁判对策[D];暨南大学;2015年
，本文编号：2204508
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hyflw/2204508.html
