当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 刑法论文 >

聚众斗殴罪“聚众”及“斗殴”行为的认定

发布时间:2018-06-05 00:23

  本文选题:聚众斗殴罪 + 聚众犯罪 ; 参考:《苏州大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:本文在理解聚众斗殴罪“聚众”行为与“斗殴”行为之关系以及处罚对象的基础上,分别对“聚众”行为与“斗殴”行为的认定要点进行了分析。 在分析认定“聚众”行为的部分,本文通过对聚众斗殴罪与其他聚众犯罪的共性、特殊性进行比较,从而引出聚众斗殴罪之“聚众”情节在实务审判中的认定难点——如何区别于一般民事纠纷中的“聚集”行为,并结合对案例的分析,,总结聚众斗殴罪的“聚众”情节与一般民事纠纷的“聚集”之认定异同。 在分析对聚众斗殴罪“斗殴”行为之认定的部分,本文从(聚众)斗殴行为主观与客观统一性的角度分析该如何认定行为人的行为是否属于聚众斗殴罪的“斗殴”情节,并通过比较殴打行为构成的其他罪行(以故意伤害罪为例),对其中的“开始没有斗殴故意,在情节发展中具有斗殴故意”之情形进行简要分析。 最后,本文还对聚众斗殴罪的加重情节之“持械”,列举了典型案例,重点就“械”的界定,以及对未持械者责任认定阐述了作者自身的观点。
[Abstract]:Based on the understanding of the relationship between the behavior of "gathering the crowd" and the behavior of "affray" and the object of punishment, this paper analyzes the main points of the identification of the behavior of "gathering the crowd" and the behavior of "affray" respectively. In the part of analyzing the behavior of "gathering together", this article compares the common character and particularity of the crime of affray and other crime of gathering together. Thus, it leads to the difficulty of determining the plot of "gathering the crowd" in the practical trial-how to distinguish it from the behavior of "gathering" in general civil disputes, and combining with the analysis of the case, This paper summarizes the similarities and differences between the plot of gathering the masses and the common civil disputes. In the part of analyzing the identification of "affray" behavior of the crime of affray, this paper analyzes how to determine whether the behavior of the perpetrator belongs to the "affray" plot of the crime of affray from the angle of subjective and objective unity of the act of affray. By comparing other crimes constituted by beating (taking the crime of intentional injury as an example), this paper briefly analyzes the situation that "there is no brawl intention at the beginning and there is brawl intention in the development of the plot". At last, this paper enumerates the typical cases of the aggravated circumstances of the crime of affray, focuses on the definition of "armed", and expounds the author's own views on the responsibility of the unarmed.
【学位授予单位】:苏州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.3

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前6条

1 苏雄华;;斗殴行为及其特征[J];重庆社会科学;2009年10期

2 钱涛;;单方具有聚众斗殴故意的行为应如何认定[J];法制与社会;2010年01期

3 张启环;;聚众斗殴罪的实务问题研究[J];公安研究;2013年02期

4 王其星;;正当防卫与相互斗殴的界限[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2014年05期

5 张闪闪;;聚众斗殴罪量刑情节之考量——以杭州某院近四年案例的调查分析为基础[J];法制与社会;2014年16期

6 樊华中;;非典型性聚众斗殴犯罪的法律适用分析[J];中国检察官;2013年10期



本文编号:1979535

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1979535.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户cbaaf***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com