当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 刑法论文 >

为境外窃

发布时间:2018-06-06 02:34

  本文选题:境外 + 军事秘密 ; 参考:《广西民族大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:在适用《刑法》第四百三十一条关于本罪的规定时,需要对相关的规定予以明晰,准确把握概念内涵,严格区分罪与非罪、此罪与彼罪。通过详尽分析本罪的具体内涵、犯罪特征、司法认定需注意的问题等,将该罪更清晰的展现出来,便于司法实践更准确判断罪与非罪、此罪与彼罪。通过比较分析,发现《刑法》关于本罪的规定,存在立法的缺陷问题,并结合我国立法体例和司法实践,有针对性的提出完善本罪规定的修法建议。本文首先从罪名概念、立法沿革和犯罪构成等角度对本罪进行介绍,明确其具体含义、立法背景和犯罪构成特征等。通过综合多方学者观点对比分析,对本罪的犯罪四要件进行准确界定。比如有充分依据认定本罪犯罪客体为复杂客体;用“事项”来定义军事秘密比用“信息”更加合理;探讨了“境外”的范围是否包含香港、澳门、台湾的争议问题;刑法关于犯罪客体即“涉及国防安全与军事利益的军事秘密”之规定不够明确,而《中国人民解放军保密条例》其规定过于概括,留给司法者自由裁量权过大等问题。第二章主要分析了本罪的司法认定问题,从单独犯罪和共同犯罪两个角度分别探讨。本罪作为选择性罪名,在确定犯罪罪名时,须依据具体的行为方式种类,同时军事秘密作为特殊犯罪对象,其受侵害的批次数也可影响罪名。第三章对本罪的立法问题进行有益探讨,主要针对犯罪情节的规定、刑罚种类的设置和犯罪主体的规定进行分析,阐述其存在的缺陷,提出完善的建议。
[Abstract]:When applying the provisions of Article 431 of the Criminal Law on this crime, it is necessary to clarify the relevant provisions, grasp the connotation of the concept accurately, and strictly distinguish between the crime and the non-crime, this crime and the other crime. Through the detailed analysis of the specific connotation of the crime, the characteristics of the crime, judicial cognizance of the need to pay attention to the problem, the crime is more clearly displayed, so as to facilitate the judicial practice more accurate judgment of the crime and non-crime, this crime and that crime. Through comparative analysis, it is found that the provisions of the Criminal Law on this crime, there are defects in legislation, and combined with our legislative style and judicial practice, targeted to improve the provisions of the crime proposed to amend the law. Firstly, this paper introduces the crime from the angle of the concept of charge, legislative evolution and the constitution of crime, and clarifies its specific meaning, legislative background and the characteristics of the constitution of the crime. The four elements of the crime are accurately defined through the comparative analysis of the views of various scholars. For example, there is sufficient basis to identify the object of the crime as a complex object; to define military secret by "matter" is more reasonable than to use "information"; to discuss whether the scope of "overseas" includes the controversial issues of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan; The provisions of criminal law concerning the object of crime, that is, "military secret involving national defense security and military interests", are not clear enough, but the provisions of the "people's Liberation Army secrecy regulations" are too general, leaving too much discretion to the judiciary and so on. The second chapter mainly analyzes the problem of judicial cognizance of this crime, from the two angles of individual crime and joint crime. This crime as a selective crime, in determining the crime, must be based on the specific types of behavior, and military secrets as a special object of crime, its number of attacks can also affect the charges. The third chapter discusses the legislation of this crime, mainly in view of the provisions of the circumstances of the crime, the establishment of penalties and the provisions of the main body of the crime are analyzed, its shortcomings are expounded, and suggestions for improvement are put forward.
【学位授予单位】:广西民族大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D924.3

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 冉巨火;;论法条竞合与想象竞合的区分及其适用原则——兼论军职罪中封闭的特权条款[J];法学杂志;2016年04期

2 陈洪兵;;选择性罪名若干问题探究[J];法商研究;2015年06期

3 孙战国;;刑法与保密法衔接应注意的几个问题[J];铁道警察学院学报;2014年06期

4 张明楷;;共同犯罪的认定方法[J];法学研究;2014年03期

5 林维;;真正身份犯之共犯问题展开——实行行为决定论的贯彻[J];法学家;2013年06期

6 胡博;;浅析俄罗斯军事刑罚制度对我国的启示[J];武警学院学报;2011年05期

7 黄尚杰;刘振宇;;军人违反职责罪若干问题探析[J];政工学刊;2011年01期

8 马忠全;;军人违反职责罪中引入罚金刑问题探析[J];法制与社会;2009年35期

9 高巍;;军人违反职责罪立法缺陷浅探[J];西安社会科学;2009年02期

10 张春林;军人违反职责罪若干问题探析[J];人民检察;2005年15期

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 赵东斌;;中外军事刑罚制度比较[N];检察日报;2004年

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 李国振;军人违反职责罪体系化研究[D];中国政法大学;2009年

相关硕士学位论文 前5条

1 宋yNo,

本文编号:1984651


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1984651.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户0820d***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com