郑某骗取代管财物案研究

发布时间：2018-06-07 11:34

本文选题：侵占 + 诈骗　；参考：《黑龙江大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：通过对一则既有诈骗又有侵占和盗窃行为的案例进行检讨,引出案件争议的焦点,即本案被告人的行为应当如何定性。为了从本案存在的三种行为交织的犯罪表象下,能够准确地认定被告人犯罪行为的性质。首先,在借鉴有关刑法理论和司法实践研究成果的基础上,详细地从侵占罪、诈骗罪和盗窃罪三种学说的犯罪构成要件,分析三罪名的基本认定方法,并讨论三种犯罪学说对解决本案法律评价的合理性。其次,结合郑某骗取代管财物案的具体案情,从被告人取得财物的手段行为、被害人财物的交付事实是否存在,以及被告人的“非法占有目的”的具体认定等三方面,对案例中出现的关键行为进行分析和判断,认定被告人取得财物的手段行为是秘密窃取行为、不存在被害人对财物的交付事实、被告人从始至终对被害人就具有非法占有目的的意图,符合盗窃罪的行为逻辑,最终认定本案属于为带有欺诈性质的盗窃案。围绕本案争议的焦点问题,笔者分别从学说见解和行为方式上进行评析,使得案件的研究更具现实意义,以期在今后的司法实践中对类似争议案件有所帮助。
[Abstract]:Through the review of a case of both fraud and embezzlement and theft, the focus of the case controversy is how to characterize the defendant's behavior in this case. In order to accurately identify the nature of the defendant's criminal behavior from the appearance of the three kinds of behavior intertwined in this case. First of all, on the basis of drawing lessons from the research results of relevant criminal law theory and judicial practice, this paper analyzes the basic identification methods of the three charges from the crime of embezzlement, the crime of fraud and the crime of larceny. And discusses the rationality of three criminal theories to solve the legal evaluation of this case. Secondly, in combination with the specific circumstances of Zheng Mou's case of defrauding escrow property, there are three aspects: the means of obtaining property by the accused, whether the fact of the victim's property delivery exists, and the concrete determination of the defendant's "illegal possession purpose". Through the analysis and judgment of the key behaviors in the case, it is concluded that the means by which the defendant acquires property is an act of secret theft, and that there is no fact of the victim's delivery of the property. The defendant has the intention of illegally possessing the victim from beginning to end, which accords with the logic of larceny, and finally determines that this case is a theft case with the nature of fraud. Focusing on the focus of the dispute in this case, the author evaluates the case from the perspective of theory and behavior, making the case study more practical significance, in order to help similar dispute cases in the future judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】