共犯行为正犯化的立法探索与理论梳理——以“帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪”立法定位为角度的分析

发布时间：2018-06-08 07:56

本文选题：共犯行为正犯化 + 形式共犯论　；参考：《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2017年03期

【摘要】：面对网络共同犯罪中帮助行为的危害性超越和独立性的突破,传统共犯理论略显手足无措。应当坦率地从罪情演变和理论套路的紧张关系出发进行对话,理解和完善既有的司法规则和立法条文。形式共犯论可以解决部分问题,但实质共犯论下的共犯独立性思路更为有效。司法实践对于网络共犯的制裁进行了探索,形成了三种模式并存的态势,构成了正犯化的三种途径,也面临着定量标准协调和罪刑法定限制的问题。立法修正从特殊帮助行为的正犯化到一般帮助行为的正犯化,都需要厘清其性质争议和正当性质疑,进一步完善犯罪圈与罪刑相当。共犯行为的正犯化需要司法解释和立法完善的双轨推进。
[Abstract]:In the face of the breakthrough of the harmfulness and independence of the helping behavior in the network joint crime, the theory of traditional accomplice is a little bewildered. We should have a frank dialogue based on the evolution of the crime situation and the tense relations between the theoretical routines and understand and perfect the existing judicial rules and legislative provisions. Formal accomplice theory can solve some problems, but the idea of accomplice independence under substantive accomplice theory is more effective. The judicial practice has explored the sanction of network accomplice, formed the situation of three modes coexisting, constituted three ways of principal offense, and also faced the problem of the coordination of quantitative standard and the limitation of legally prescribed punishment for a crime. It is necessary to clarify the nature of legislative amendment from the crime of special helping behavior to the crime of general helping behavior, and to further perfect the crime circle and the crime and punishment. Accomplice behavior needs judicial interpretation and legislation to perfect the dual-track advance.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学司法文明协同创新中心;
【基金】：中国法学会重点委托课题(CLS[2016]ZDWT07)“防范和打击网络新型违法犯罪研究”
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】