刑法修正:维度、策略、评价与反思

发布时间：2018-06-16 00:08

  本文选题：刑法修正 + 刑法结构　； 参考：《法学研究》2017年01期

【摘要】：近年来,刑法修正案运用多种修正策略,对刑法进行重大修正,展现出刑法干预早期化、能动化、犯罪圈不断扩大的立法趋向。这一趋向既不意味着法治国自由刑法的诉求已成过眼烟云,也不意味着积极的刑法立法观在我国就此确立。犯罪圈扩大的立法趋向在总体上具有客观必然性和实践合理性,但刑法修正案的某些条款在合目的性、明确性与体系逻辑性方面存在瑕疵;1997年刑法由"厉而不严"向"严而不厉"的结构转型尚未成功,碎片化的刑法修正案立法方式破坏了1997年刑法的外部面相和内部逻辑;1997年刑法已经进入其生命周期的后期,应适时启动对其的全面修订,并且超越刑法典单轨立法模式,构建刑法典与行政刑法的双轨立法模式。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the amendment of criminal law has made great amendments to the criminal law by using a variety of amendment strategies, showing the legislative trend of the early, active and expanding criminal circle of criminal law intervention. This trend does not mean that the pursuit of free criminal law has become a thing of the past, nor does it mean that a positive view of criminal law legislation has been established in China. The legislative trend of the expansion of the criminal circle is generally objective necessity and practical rationality, but some articles of the Criminal Law Amendment are in line with the purpose. There are flaws in clarity and system logic, and the structural transformation of 1997 criminal law from "severe but lax" to "strict but not severe" has not yet been successful. The fragmented legislative method of the amendment of criminal law has destroyed the exterior and internal logic of the 1997 criminal law, and the 1997 criminal law has entered the later stage of its life cycle, so it should start the comprehensive revision in good time, and surpass the monorail legislative model of the criminal code. Construct the dual-track legislation mode of criminal code and administrative criminal law.
【作者单位】： 北京大学法学院;
【基金】：作者承担的2016年国家哲学社会科学基金重大项目“我国刑法修正的理论模型与制度实践研究”(16ZDA061)子课题三“我国刑法修正的理论模型构建问题研究”的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D924.3
，

本文编号：2024272