我国刑法中“公共安全”的界定规则研究

发布时间：2018-06-16 01:51

本文选题：公共安全 + 界定标准　；参考：《克拉玛依学刊》2016年01期

【摘要】：对"公共安全"的界定,新近理论的"不特定说""多数人说"以及对"安全"的扩充都无法有效说明"公共安全"的内涵。而"通说""不特定多数人的人身、财产安全"既符合法律语词的文义解释规则,又能准确说明公共安全和个人安全的区别,应当成为裁判准据。"不特定人"的判断标准在于犯罪对象的可替代性和犯罪后果的不可控性;"多数人"意指犯罪行为实际或可能造成3人以上人身、财产的损害,它着眼于犯罪结果蔓延和辐射的可能。坚持上述界定标准,有利于司法实践明晰危害公共安全犯罪和具体人身、财产犯罪之间的界限,做到正确适用法律。
[Abstract]:The definition of "public safety", the new theory of "not specific", "the majority theory" and the expansion of "security" can not effectively explain the connotation of "public security". "General Theory" not specific to the majority of the person, property security "not only accord with the legal terms of the meaning of interpretation rules, but also can accurately explain the difference between public safety and personal security, should become the basis for adjudication." The criterion for determining "non-specific persons" lies in the substitutability of the object of the crime and the uncontrollable nature of the consequences of the crime; "majority" means that the criminal act actually or may cause damage to the person or property of more than three persons, It looks at the spread of crime and the possibility of radiation. It is helpful for judicial practice to clarify the boundary between crime of endangering public security and crime of specific person and property, and to apply the law correctly.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学;
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】