刑民交叉的金融诈骗案件的实体法逻辑进路

发布时间：2018-06-17 10:35

  本文选题：刑民交叉 + 先民后行再刑　； 参考：《南京师范大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：刑民交叉案件分为程序法上交叉和实体法上交叉两大类,实体法上交叉的刑民交叉案件又可以分为刑民冲突型交叉和刑民重合型交叉。而刑民重合型交叉又因为处理结果的不同可以分为,只需通过刑法的前置法来加以解决和需要追究刑事责任。对于实体法上刑民交叉的金融诈骗案件应坚持先民后行再刑的实体法逻辑进路,民商法和行政法能够调整的,就不需要动用刑法；刑罚的动用应讲求正当性、必要性和效益性。它的合理性与正当性在于,金融诈骗犯罪立法具有从属性,金融诈骗罪自身具有较弱的悖德性、可谴责性且当事人往往有过错,以及我国金融诈骗罪的刑事政策正向金融交易本位主义、金融交易主体平等保护主义、综合治理主义转变,且民事、行政制裁同样具有报应和预防的双重目的。对于民法上规定的合法行为,即使符合刑法上的犯罪构成也无须进行刑法评价,而明确行政处罚与刑事处罚的界限应主要考虑行为人的主观恶性程度、有无民事救济的可能以及被害人的意愿等。即使在超出民法调整范畴,需要追究刑事责任的情形下,民事责任的有效合理承担可能对刑事责任的确定产生较大的影响,因此还应关注对犯罪嫌疑人的救济,尽可能将犯罪嫌疑人无法弥补的损失降到最小。先民后行再刑需要有一定的社会基础,即非刑事预防机制成为金融犯罪预防机制的主要方面,民事、经济、行政预防手段的完善化、衔接化、制度化。
[Abstract]:Criminal and civilian cross cases can be divided into two categories: procedural law crossover and substantive law crossover. Criminal and civil cross cases can be divided into criminal conflict type and criminal and civil overlap type. The overlapping of criminal law and people can be divided into two categories because of the different processing results, which need only be solved by the law of criminal law and investigated for criminal responsibility. For the financial fraud cases where criminal law and people cross each other in substantive law, we should adhere to the logic way of substantive law, which can be adjusted by civil and commercial law and administrative law, and the use of penalty should be justified, necessary and beneficial. Its rationality and legitimacy lie in the fact that the legislation of financial fraud crime has subservience, and the crime of financial fraud has its own weak moral character, reprehensible, and the parties are often at fault. And the criminal policy of the crime of financial fraud in our country is turning to the localization of financial transaction, the equal protectionism of the subject of financial transaction, the transformation of comprehensive management doctrine, and the civil and administrative sanctions have the dual purpose of retribution and prevention. For the legal acts stipulated in the civil law, it is not necessary to evaluate the criminal law even if it conforms to the constitution of the crime in the criminal law, and the demarcation between the administrative punishment and the criminal punishment should mainly consider the subjective malignancy of the perpetrator. Whether there is the possibility of civil relief and the will of the victim and so on. Even if it is beyond the scope of civil law adjustment and criminal liability needs to be investigated, the effective and reasonable assumption of civil liability may have a greater impact on the determination of criminal liability. Therefore, attention should also be paid to the relief of criminal suspects. Minimize as much as possible the irreparable loss of a criminal suspect. The non-criminal prevention mechanism becomes the main aspect of the financial crime prevention mechanism, and the civil, economic and administrative preventive measures are perfect, connected and institutionalized.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3;D923

【参考文献】

中国期刊全文数据库 前9条

1 龙宗智;论我国转型期规制经济的刑事政策[J];法学;2005年01期

2 潘庸鲁;;被害人过错:集资诈骗案件中一个应然考量的情节因素——兼对吴英案的思考[J];长白学刊;2013年02期

3 游伟;;刑民关系与我国的刑事法实践[J];华东刑事司法评论;2006年00期

4 贾宇;死刑的理性思考与现实选择[J];法学研究;1997年02期

5 陈兴良;金融诈欺的法理分析[J];中外法学;1996年03期

6 高艳东;;诈骗罪与集资诈骗罪的规范超越:吴英案的罪与罚[J];中外法学;2012年02期

7 高艳东;金融诈骗罪立法定位与价值取向探析[J];现代法学;2003年03期

8 陈兴良;;形式解释论的再宣示[J];中国法学;2010年04期

9 赵辉;;拯救浙商——危机企业重整之路[J];中国企业家;2012年09期

，

本文编号：2030738