刑法中的扒窃行为研究

发布时间：2018-06-18 02:30

本文选题：扒窃行为 + 立法沿革　；参考：《河南大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：《刑法修正案（八）》对于盗窃罪的修改，使得扒窃行为从行政处罚层面上升到刑法犯罪层面，这一变化引起了社会上的广泛的讨论。这一修改使扒窃行为较为清晰的进入社会公众视野，同时也提升了打击扒窃犯罪的力度，扒窃行为因为较大的社会危害性和严重的主观恶性被纳入刑法犯罪范畴之内，与我国一贯主张的宽严相济的刑事政策的要求相吻合。对扒窃行为自身进行一次比较透彻的剖析有利于司法实践中的具体应用，对其自身相对模糊的、不明确的特性深入研究，是对立法的明晰。这一修改本身就证明了我国立法的与时俱进。本文笔者通过对扒窃的立法沿革的梳理，深入分析了刑法对扒窃行为的惩处依据，充分肯定了扒窃行为入刑的合情合理性，虽然将扒窃行为纳入刑法处罚范畴之内，并予以法律上的规定，但是在当前社会中仍然存在着关于适用扒窃行为的法律上的困境，通过引用例子进行评析，对扒窃的概念进行明确研究界定，从而对扒窃概念和自身特征的解析，认为扒窃的含义是：以非法占有为目的在公共场所或者其他开放性公共场所秘密窃取他人随身携带的财物的行为。同时，对扒窃行为的犯罪构成进行了分析研究，从犯罪构成的四个方面进行了细致的剖析，将其作为一个独立的罪看待，有利于厘清扒窃行为在司法适用中的繁琐模糊的不同一之处。由于其自身的特殊性和复杂性，笔者从横向对扒窃行为中几个模糊的词语进行了明确的界定，诸如“公共场所”“随身携带”等。扒窃行为作为盗窃罪中新增的罪状之一，有必要与其他相关的几种罪状进行区分，以期充分的对扒窃作出更明确清晰的范围。针对于此方面的实践运用问题，笔者提出了相关的建议，认为对于扒窃行为的认定，应综合具体的案件事实、情节和数额、次数等多方面的因素，同时充分运用刑法总则中“但书”来判断某一扒窃行为是否属于犯罪范畴。通过一系列的比较分析，从《刑修八》和两高的司法解释中对扒窃行为的刑事责任进行了解读，使得刑法中对扒窃行为的认定处罚在司法实践中得到更加合情合理的运用和执行。本文除引言和结语外，可以分为四个部分：第一部分：刑法中的扒窃行为概述。首先，该部分深入分析研究刑法关于对扒窃行为惩处的历史沿革，从1979年以来的立法司法的规定解释梳理我国刑法对于扒窃行为的惩处程度，日益重视以及详细的规定使得扒窃行为进入公众的视野；其次，该部分分析了扒窃行为入罪的立法依据，充分论证了入罪的合理性和实时性；最后，对于扒窃行为的刑法惩处在司法实践中的适用结合《刑修八》进行分析，针对扒窃行为入刑的实质争议以及入刑后在司法实践中所面临的困境应当如何解决等提出一系列的问题。第二部分：刑法中的扒窃行为的内涵及其犯罪构成。首先，该部分深入分析了扒窃行为的实质和内涵，在综合研究了各学说理论的基础之上，提出了本文对于扒窃行为的概念和实质内涵的见解；其次，该部分对扒窃行为作为盗窃罪的法定罪状之一进行的对其内在的特质符合刑法上规定的犯罪构成各方面的分析解读，为扒窃入刑提供了强有力的说服力。第三部分：对刑法中的扒窃行为的认定。首先，该部分是对扒窃行为作为“新生”罪状的横向分析研究，通过把扒窃行为和多次盗窃、携带凶器盗窃、入户盗窃以及一般盗窃进行对比分析，总结了扒窃行为的自身所特有的特性以及在实践中的合理运用和区分；其次，该部分针对扒窃行为在司法实务中所面临的问题给出了分析和解释，尤其是在入刑后的适时理解和应用，在综合案例和其自身的特性后，对其概念中的争议特征和状态等进行了研究，，并结合“但书”规定，确保达到社会效果和法律效果的统一。第四部分：刑法中的扒窃行为的刑事责任。该部分通过对《刑修八》和两高的司法解释对扒窃行为规定的解读，对扒窃行为应当承担的刑事责任进行明确。
[Abstract]:The amendment of the criminal law (eight) > the revision of the crime of theft, which has made pickpocket rise from the administrative penalty to the criminal level of criminal law. This change has caused widespread discussion in the society. This change makes pickpocket more clear to the public view, and has also promoted the efforts to combat theft of pickpocket. The great social harmfulness and serious subjective malignancy are included in the criminal category of criminal law, which coincide with the requirements of the criminal policy that our country has always advocated. A thorough analysis of the behavior of pickpocket is beneficial to the concrete application of the judicial practice, and to its own relatively vague and ambiguous characteristics. It is clear about legislation. This amendment proves that our legislation is keeping pace with the times.
In this paper, through the combing of the legislative evolution of pickpocket, the author deeply analyzes the punishment basis of the criminal law on the behavior of pickpocket, and fully affirms the reasonable nature of the action of pickpocket into punishment. Although the action of pickpocket is included in the category of penal penal punishment, and the legal provisions are given, there still exist in the current society about the application of pickpocket. In the legal predicament, the concept of pickpocket is clearly defined, and the concept of pickpocket and its own characteristics are analyzed, and the meaning of pickpocket is to secretly steal the belongings of others in public places or other open public places with the purpose of illegal possession. The constitution of the crime of pickpocket is analyzed and analyzed. The four aspects of the constitution of the crime are carefully analyzed and considered as an independent crime. It is beneficial to clarify the different and fuzzy differences in the application of pickpocket in judicial application. The ambiguous words are clearly defined, such as "public places" and "carry on". As one of the newly added charges in the crime of theft, pickpocket is necessary to distinguish several other related charges in order to make a clearer and clearer scope for pickpocket. According to the relevant suggestions, it is believed that the identification of pickpocket should be integrated with the facts of the case, the plot and the amount, the number of times and so on. At the same time, we should fully use the "proviso" in the general provisions of the criminal law to determine whether a pickpocket is a criminal category. Through a series of comparative analyses, the judicial interpretation of the eight > and the two high schools of punishment is made. The criminal responsibility of pickpocket is interpreted in the criminal law, which makes the punishment of the behavior of pickpocket in the criminal law more reasonable application and execution in judicial practice.
In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this article can be divided into four parts.
The first part is an overview of the behavior of pickpocket in criminal law. First, this part analyses the historical evolution of criminal law on the punishment of pickpocket, and explains the degree of punishment to pickpocket in China's criminal law from the legislative judicature since 1979. Secondly, this part analyzes the legislative basis of the crime of pickpocket entry, fully demonstrates the rationality and real time of the crime. Finally, the application of criminal punishment in the criminal law in judicial practice is analyzed in combination with the eight > penalty repair, the substantive dispute on the entry of the crime of pickpocket and the difficulties faced in the judicial practice after entering the penalty. How to solve a series of problems should be put forward.
The second part: the connotation of the behavior of pickpocket in criminal law and the constitution of the crime. First, this part analyses the essence and connotation of the behavior of pickpocket, and puts forward the views on the concept and essence of pickpocket behavior on the basis of the comprehensive study of the theories of various doctrines. Secondly, the part of this part is the law of theft. The internal characteristics of one of the convictions conforms to the analysis and interpretation of all aspects of the criminal constitution stipulated in the criminal law, which provides a powerful persuasiveness for pickpocket entry.
The third part: the identification of pickpocket in criminal law. First, this part is a lateral analysis of the behavior of pickpocket as a "new" crime. Through the comparison and analysis of pickpocket behavior and multiple burglary, carrying on the theft, burglary and general theft, it summarizes the unique characteristics of pickpocket behavior and its actual characteristics. The rational use and distinction of the practice are made. Secondly, this part gives an analysis and explanation to the problems faced by the action of pickpocket in the judicial practice, especially the timely understanding and application after entering the sentence. After the comprehensive case and its own characteristics, it studies the controversial features and state of the concept, and combines the provisions of the "proviso". Ensure the unity of social effects and legal effects.
The fourth part: the criminal responsibility of the act of pickpocket in criminal law. In this part, the criminal responsibility for pickpocketing should be clarified through the interpretation of the provisions of the judicial interpretation of the eight and the two high judicial interpretations of the criminal law.
【学位授予单位】：河南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.35

【参考文献】