入户盗窃若干问题研究
发布时间:2018-06-24 02:29
本文选题:入户盗窃 + 法益 ; 参考:《贵州民族大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:盗窃罪,自古以来就被视为侵犯财产类犯罪之首,其理论与实践颇受刑法界的关注。传统刑法理论界与司法实践中通常都是综合考虑行为人的盗窃数额和犯罪主客观方面的要件,或者以行为人入户盗窃的次数作为其是否构罪的认定标准。 2011年5月1日颁布施行的《刑法修正案(八)》,对盗窃罪的罪状作出了较大的修正。其中最大的变化是,传统盗窃罪中的“数额较大”和“多次盗窃”不再成为盗窃罪必不可少的构成要素,取而代之的是几种新的行为类型。同时,也正是因为立法的修正,使得盗窃罪再一次成为理论与实践争论的焦点。而成为盗窃罪一种行为类型的入户盗窃,也由于自身性质的变化,,成为理论界与实务界着重讨论的对象。故笔者认为,重新解读修订后的入户盗窃,非常有必要。本文分为三大部分,共3万多字。 文章第一部分是对入户盗窃基础知识的概述。笔者首先对入户盗窃中的“户”进行观点评述,并提出自己对“户”的理解;其次,通过对“入户”行为与“盗窃”行为之间关系的论述,认为入户盗窃是指非法进入供他人家庭生活,与外界相对隔离的住宅实施盗窃的行为;最后是对入户盗窃行为特征的分析。对入户盗窃基础知识的阐述,目的在于为进一步研究探讨入户盗窃的相关理论知识打下扎实的基础。 文章第二部分探讨的是入户盗窃的保护法益。笔者首先通过司法实践中的几则典型案例,来反映由于刑法立法的变化所引出的法益保护问题。并着重探讨了入户盗窃保护法益的变更原因及其侧重点,并得出其法益保护的侧重点仍然是公民的财产权益这一结论,并以此为基础进一步研究入户盗窃涉及的相关刑法理论问题。 文章第三部分主要研究的是入户盗窃所涉及到的犯罪形态。笔者首先分析了入户盗窃“着手”于何时,从而进一步探讨明确入户盗窃的既遂未遂形态,并且认为入户盗窃存在未遂形态,应当基于结果无价值理论严格区分入户盗窃的既遂和未遂;其次着重探讨了入户盗窃的犯罪类型,并得出入户盗窃属于结果犯的结论;最后对入户盗窃的中止形态进行了阐述,并且认为入户盗窃的中止形态包括预备阶段的中止、实行阶段的中止等形态。
[Abstract]:Larceny has been regarded as the first crime of infringing property since ancient times, and its theory and practice have attracted much attention from the criminal law circle. In the traditional criminal law theory and judicial practice, the amount of theft and the subjective and objective aspects of the crime are considered comprehensively. Or take the times of the doer's burglary as the criterion of determining whether the crime is constructed or not. The Criminal Law Amendment (8) promulgated and implemented on May 1, 2011, has made a big amendment to the crime of larceny. The biggest change is that the "large amount" and "multiple theft" in the traditional larceny are no longer the essential elements of the larceny, but are replaced by several new types of behavior. At the same time, because of the amendment of legislation, larceny once again becomes the focus of debate between theory and practice. However, burglary, as a kind of behavior type, has become the focus of discussion in the theoretical and practical circles because of the change of its own nature. Therefore, the author believes that it is necessary to reinterpret the revised burglary. This article is divided into three parts, a total of more than 30,000 words. The first part of the article is an overview of the basic knowledge of burglary. First, the author comments on the "household" in the burglary, and puts forward his own understanding of the "household"; secondly, through the discussion of the relationship between the behavior of "entering the house" and the "theft", It is considered that burglary refers to the act of illegally entering the house for other people's family life and being isolated from the outside world, and finally, the analysis of the characteristics of the behavior of burglary. The purpose of this paper is to lay a solid foundation for further research on the relevant theoretical knowledge of burglary. The second part of the article discusses the protection benefits of burglary. Firstly, the author reflects the legal interest protection problem caused by the change of criminal law legislation through several typical cases in judicial practice. It also discusses the reason and emphasis of the change of the interest of burglary protection law, and draws the conclusion that the focus of the protection of legal interests is still the property rights and interests of citizens. And on the basis of the further study of burglary related to the theory of criminal law. The third part mainly studies the criminal form involved in burglary. At first, the author analyzes when the burglary "begins", and further discusses the attempted form of attempted burglary, and thinks that there exists the attempted form of burglary. It should be based on the theory of no value of results to strictly distinguish the accomplished and attempted burglary. Secondly, it discusses the crime types of burglary, and draws the conclusion that the burglary belongs to the result crime. Finally, the paper expounds the discontinuance form of the burglary. And it is considered that the suspension form of the burglary includes the suspension of the preparatory stage and the suspension of the implementation stage.
【学位授予单位】:贵州民族大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.35
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 肖中华;论抢劫罪适用中的几个问题[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;1998年05期
2 邢启阳;;浅议“入户盗窃”的犯罪构成及形态[J];法制与经济(中旬);2012年06期
3 周莉;;“入户盗窃”立法修正解读[J];河北公安警察职业学院学报;2012年01期
4 王蕊;;入户盗窃罪责刑相适应问题研究[J];法制与社会;2012年23期
5 王忠光;;“入户盗窃”既遂与未遂的认定——从法益保护视角考量[J];法制与社会;2012年26期
6 玄金华;张永萍;;“入户盗窃”犯罪停止形态问题研究[J];法制与社会;2012年13期
7 吕文渊;;入户盗窃未遂行为的定性分析[J];甘肃警察职业学院学报;2009年03期
8 周振想,林维;抢劫罪特别类型研究[J];人民检察;1999年01期
9 朱兴;;盗窃罪新论——以罗克辛归责理论为视角[J];社科纵横;2010年11期
10 章国田;姚嘉伟;;新三类盗窃案件贯彻宽严相济刑事政策的思考[J];中国刑事法杂志;2012年07期
本文编号:2059576
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2059576.html