网络服务提供者刑事责任的认定路径——兼评快播案的相关争议

发布时间：2019-06-13 19:31

【摘要】：快播案的争议反映了我国刑法学界对网络服务提供者刑事责任认定的诸多分歧。目前较为具有代表性的观点主要从中立帮助行为理论的角度来加以分析。这一观点对于限缩我国网络服务提供者宽泛的刑事责任范围具有重要意义,但其在事实上的适用范围是有限的。一方面,互联网中共同犯罪行为的异化现象导致适用共犯理论较为困难。另一方面,网络服务提供者与普通的经营者存在明显主体特性差异,部分类型的网络服务提供者在特定情形中同时具有市场经营主体和监督主体的双重属性。在共犯理论之外,应当注重从正犯的角度来分析该问题。对于网络服务提供者刑法责任之认定,首先应当区分作为与不作为,其后进一步以网络服务提供者的类型化为基础,具体分析作为义务的来源,以最终确认网络服务提供者的刑事责任。
[Abstract]:The dispute of express case reflects many differences in the identification of criminal responsibility of network service providers in the field of criminal law in our country. At present, the representative point of view is mainly from the perspective of neutral help behavior theory. This view is of great significance to limit the broad scope of criminal liability of network service providers in China, but its scope of application is limited in fact. On the one hand, the alienation of joint criminal behavior in the Internet makes it difficult to apply the accomplice theory. On the other hand, there are obvious differences in subject characteristics between network service providers and ordinary operators, and some types of network service providers have the dual attributes of market management subject and supervision subject at the same time in specific cases. In addition to the accomplice theory, we should pay attention to the analysis of the problem from the perspective of principal offender. In order to confirm the criminal responsibility of the network service provider, we should first distinguish between action and omission, and then further analyze it as the source of the obligation on the basis of the classification of the network service provider, so as to finally confirm the criminal responsibility of the network service provider.
【作者单位】：北京大学法学院;马普外国与国际刑法研究所;
【基金】：国家留学基金委高水平大学公派研究生项目(201506010316)的资助
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】