罪刑配置阶段的刑罚目的研究
发布时间:2019-06-17 11:50
【摘要】:刑罚目的是刑罚理论的基础与核心,刑罚目的理论的选择对刑罚运作的全过程均有根本性的影响,因此刑罚目的理论研究向来是刑罚理论研究的重点和热点。但是,过往的刑罚目的理论研究基本以刑罚运作的整体过程作为研究对象,使得研究常常难以深入,而结论也缺少针对性和实用性,无论是对刑罚理论研究还是刑事法律实践都有一定的消极影响。 要改变刑罚目的理论研究这种大而空的研究现状,深入分析和了解刑罚运作过程各阶段适格的刑罚目的,,就需要改变刑罚目的理论研究的这种“整体化”的研究思路,根据刑罚运作过程各个不同阶段的特征进行个别化研究。在罪刑配置、刑罚适用和刑罚执行这三个刑罚运作的阶段中,罪刑配置阶段是最基础、最根本和最核心的,是刑罚适用与刑罚执行的前提。罪刑配置阶段的刑罚承担着确定犯罪行为和确定刑罚范围两个重要的任务,前者与犯罪论相连,后者与刑罚论相通,是刑罚运作的起点环节与核心环节。可以说,刑罚适用及执行就是为了保证罪刑配置阶段的刑罚目的能够得以实现。因此,进行阶段化的刑罚目的理论研究最重要的就是解决罪刑配置阶段的刑罚目的选择,选择好罪刑配置阶段的刑罚目的是选择其它阶段刑罚目的的前提与基础。 本文通过历史研究方法,比较研究方法和实证分析方法对罪刑配置阶段的刑罚目的进行研究。首先,通过回顾和分析过往的刑罚目的理论研究,指出对罪刑配置阶段的刑罚目的进行研究具有相当的必要性,并在此说明罪刑配置阶段刑罚目的的内涵及其研究意义。其次,为了能够为本文的研究提供理论上的起点和资源,对传统的刑罚目的理论进行了相当程度的梳理。再次,以罪刑配置阶段的视对传统的刑罚目的理论进行分析,可以发现这些理论在回答刑罚正当性及刑罚目的的可操作性这两个问题均存在着不足,有必要在这些理论的基础上寻找适格的罪刑配置阶段的刑罚目的。最后,本文认为根据罪刑配置阶段的特征,提倡并论证实证的正义报应理论应当是适格的罪刑配置阶段的刑罚目的。
[Abstract]:The purpose of the penalty is the basis and the core of the penalty theory. The choice of the theory of penalty is a fundamental influence on the whole process of the operation of the penalty, so the theoretical study of the purpose of the penalty is always the focus and the hot spot of the study of the penalty theory. However, the theoretical research of the past penalty aims at the whole process of the operation of the penalty as the research object, so that the research is often difficult to go deep, and the conclusion is also lacking of the pertinence and the practicability, whether it has a certain negative effect on the theory of punishment or the practice of criminal law. In order to change the theory of penalty, to study the present situation of such a large and empty study, to analyze and understand the purpose of the penalty for each stage of the penalty operation, this "integrated" of the theoretical study on the purpose of penalty is to be changed. The individual research and research on the characteristics of various stages of the operation process of the penalty In the stages of the execution of the three sentences of the crime, the application of the penalty and the execution of the penalty, the stage of the allocation of the crime is the basis, the most fundamental and the most important, and it is the application of the penalty and the execution of the penalty. The penalty of the stage of the disposition of the crime is the two important tasks in determining the crime and determining the scope of the penalty. The former is connected with the crime theory. The latter is in communication with the penalty theory. It is the starting point and the core ring of the operation of the penalty. Section. It can be said that the application and execution of the penalty is to ensure that the purpose of the penalty for the period of the crime is to be real Therefore, the most important of the theoretical study of the purpose of the phase-oriented penalty is to solve the choice of the purpose of the penalty for the phase of the crime and sentence, and to choose the purpose of the criminal penalty in order to choose the premise and the basis of the purpose of the penalty in other stages. The purpose of this paper is to compare the method of historical research, the comparative study method and the empirical analysis method to the penalty purpose of the crime and sentence allocation stage. First of all, by reviewing and analyzing the theoretical study of the past penalty, it is pointed out that the study of the purpose of the penalty for the period of the crime and punishment is of considerable necessity, and the connotation and the research of the purpose of the penalty for the period of the crime and punishment are described in this paper. Secondly, in order to be able to provide the theoretical starting point and resources for the research of this paper, the theory of the traditional penalty aims to a considerable extent In this paper, the author makes an analysis on the theory of the traditional penalty in the view of the stage of crime and punishment, and it can be found that these two problems exist in answering the validity of the penalty and the operability of the purpose of the penalty. On the basis of these theories, there is a need to find a case of the proper execution of the crime and punishment. Finally, according to the characteristics of the period of the disposition of the crime, this paper advocates and proves that the theory of the theory of justice in the case of the case should be the punishment of the appropriate period of the crime and punishment.
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D914
本文编号:2500963
[Abstract]:The purpose of the penalty is the basis and the core of the penalty theory. The choice of the theory of penalty is a fundamental influence on the whole process of the operation of the penalty, so the theoretical study of the purpose of the penalty is always the focus and the hot spot of the study of the penalty theory. However, the theoretical research of the past penalty aims at the whole process of the operation of the penalty as the research object, so that the research is often difficult to go deep, and the conclusion is also lacking of the pertinence and the practicability, whether it has a certain negative effect on the theory of punishment or the practice of criminal law. In order to change the theory of penalty, to study the present situation of such a large and empty study, to analyze and understand the purpose of the penalty for each stage of the penalty operation, this "integrated" of the theoretical study on the purpose of penalty is to be changed. The individual research and research on the characteristics of various stages of the operation process of the penalty In the stages of the execution of the three sentences of the crime, the application of the penalty and the execution of the penalty, the stage of the allocation of the crime is the basis, the most fundamental and the most important, and it is the application of the penalty and the execution of the penalty. The penalty of the stage of the disposition of the crime is the two important tasks in determining the crime and determining the scope of the penalty. The former is connected with the crime theory. The latter is in communication with the penalty theory. It is the starting point and the core ring of the operation of the penalty. Section. It can be said that the application and execution of the penalty is to ensure that the purpose of the penalty for the period of the crime is to be real Therefore, the most important of the theoretical study of the purpose of the phase-oriented penalty is to solve the choice of the purpose of the penalty for the phase of the crime and sentence, and to choose the purpose of the criminal penalty in order to choose the premise and the basis of the purpose of the penalty in other stages. The purpose of this paper is to compare the method of historical research, the comparative study method and the empirical analysis method to the penalty purpose of the crime and sentence allocation stage. First of all, by reviewing and analyzing the theoretical study of the past penalty, it is pointed out that the study of the purpose of the penalty for the period of the crime and punishment is of considerable necessity, and the connotation and the research of the purpose of the penalty for the period of the crime and punishment are described in this paper. Secondly, in order to be able to provide the theoretical starting point and resources for the research of this paper, the theory of the traditional penalty aims to a considerable extent In this paper, the author makes an analysis on the theory of the traditional penalty in the view of the stage of crime and punishment, and it can be found that these two problems exist in answering the validity of the penalty and the operability of the purpose of the penalty. On the basis of these theories, there is a need to find a case of the proper execution of the crime and punishment. Finally, according to the characteristics of the period of the disposition of the crime, this paper advocates and proves that the theory of the theory of justice in the case of the case should be the punishment of the appropriate period of the crime and punishment.
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D914
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 王振生;;间接一般预防是刑罚的根本目的[J];河北法学;2006年06期
2 蔡一军;;论刑罚目的理论的多元化趋向与整合范式——以当代西方研究发展为视角[J];广西社会科学;2011年02期
3 张康之;合法性的思维历程:从韦伯到哈贝马斯[J];教学与研究;2002年03期
4 王世洲;现代刑罚目的理论与中国的选择[J];法学研究;2003年03期
5 徐平;迟毓凯;;道德判断的社会直觉模型述评[J];心理科学;2007年02期
6 沈汪兵;刘昌;;道德判断:理性还是非理性的?——来自认知神经科学的研究[J];心理科学;2010年04期
7 张明楷;新刑法与并合主义[J];中国社会科学;2000年01期
8 罗跃嘉;李万清;彭家欣;刘超;;道德判断的认知神经机制[J];西南大学学报(社会科学版);2013年03期
本文编号:2500963
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2500963.html