论社会募捐剩余财产的所有权归属

发布时间：2018-03-24 11:15

本文选题：社会募捐　切入点：善款余额　出处：《辽宁大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：改革开放以来，社会救助、保障事业也获得了长足的发展，国家也出台相应的法律对其进行规范，但从整体上来看，我国的社会保障体系仍不完善，与发达国家存在着很大差距，在此情况下，社会慈善事业的及时出现对国家救助保障事业的完善起到了极大的促进作用，同时处于起步阶段的社会募捐，也发挥着越来越重要的作用。但目前我国无专门的法律对之进行规范调整，相关法律规定也繁杂零散，一个原本动机良好的行为却在司法实践中造成诸多纠纷，严重损害了人们的捐赠热情，如果不对其加以规范任其发展将产生不良的社会影响，所以对社会募捐的研究是极其必要的。社会募捐剩余财产所有权归属引发的纠纷整个社会募捐纠纷中，占有较大的比重，所以社会募捐剩余财产的所有权归属也是本文的重点研究内容。本文由引言、正文和结语三个方面组成。正文的第一部分是社会募捐及社会募捐剩余财产的基础理论，，分为三个具体层次。一是由案例引入，了解在实践处理中社会募捐剩余财产所有权归属的争议点，介绍社会募捐的含义以及社会募捐和近似概念的比较区别，明晰社会募捐的涵义，二是论述社会募捐的含义以及社会募捐和近似概念的比较区别，三是明确社会募捐剩余财产的产生根源及其特殊性的表现，为下文的论述做好铺垫。正文的第二部分是整篇文章的中心内容。介绍社会募捐剩余财产所有权归属的具体确认。分别从社会募捐的行为性质，法理学角度和社会公共政策，物的所有权取得方式以及社会募捐的分类几个方面综合，本着既能保护捐赠人社会募捐的积极性，保护受赠人的合法权益，又符合社会募捐本身的价值取向的原则，最后得出结论，认为社会募捐的所有权归属分两种情况讨论，在政府型募捐的情况下，归属于政府所有，在其他的情况下，归属于社会公益机构所有。本文的第三部分综合案件的实践处理以及理论上的探讨，明晰我国在社会募捐活动中存在的不足，这些不足的完善正是解决社会募捐剩余财产归属的重点，故最后提出改善这些不足的措施和建议。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, the cause of social assistance and security has also been greatly developed, and the country has also issued corresponding laws to regulate it. But on the whole, the social security system of our country is still not perfect. There is a big gap with the developed countries. In this case, the timely appearance of social charity has played a great role in promoting the improvement of the national rescue and security undertakings, and at the same time, the social fundraising in the initial stage has been greatly promoted. Also play a more and more important role. But at present, there is no special law to regulate it in our country, and the relevant laws and regulations are also complicated and scattered. A well-motivated behavior has caused many disputes in judicial practice, which has seriously damaged people's donation enthusiasm. If it is not standardized, its development will have a negative social impact, so it is extremely necessary to study social fund-raising. So the ownership of the surplus property is also the focus of this paper. This paper consists of three aspects: introduction, text and conclusion. The first part of the text is the basic theory of social fundraising and the surplus property of social collection, which is divided into three specific levels. This paper introduces the meaning of social fundraising and the comparative difference between social fund-raising and approximate concepts, clarifies the meaning of social fundraising, and discusses the meaning of social fund-raising and the comparative difference between social fund-raising and similar concepts. The third is to make clear the origin and particularity of the surplus property of social collection, and to lay the groundwork for the following discussion. The second part of the text is the central content of the whole article. It introduces the specific confirmation of the ownership of the surplus property in social fund-raising. The way of obtaining ownership of things and the classification of social donations are integrated, in line with the principle of protecting the enthusiasm of the donors, protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the recipients, and conforming to the value orientation of the social fundraising itself. Finally, it is concluded that the ownership of social fund-raising is divided into two situations, in the case of government donations, belong to the government, in other cases, belong to the public institutions. The third part of this paper deals with the practice of comprehensive cases and makes clear the deficiencies in the social fund-raising activities in China. The perfection of these deficiencies is the key to solve the problem of the ownership of the surplus property in the social fund-raising. Finally, the measures and suggestions to improve these deficiencies are put forward.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.182.3

【参考文献】